These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29881649)

  • 21. Photoscreeners in the pediatric eye office: compared testability and refractions on high-risk children.
    Peterseim MM; Papa CE; Wilson ME; Cheeseman EW; Wolf BJ; Davidson JD; Trivedi RH
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Nov; 158(5):932-8. PubMed ID: 25089352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of the PlusOptix S09 and Spot Vision photorefractor to cycloretinoscopy.
    Dikkaya F; Erdur SK
    Int Ophthalmol; 2019 Aug; 39(8):1671-1678. PubMed ID: 30255489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of the Spot Vision Screener in School-Aged Children.
    Peterseim MMW; Trivedi RH; Feldman S; Husain M; Walker M; Wilson ME; Wolf BJ
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2020 May; 57(3):146-153. PubMed ID: 32453847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of Plusoptix S12R photoscreener with cycloplegic retinoscopy and autorefraction in pediatric age group.
    Saini V; Raina UK; Gupta A; Goyal JL; Anjum R; Saini P; Gupta SK; Sharma P
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2019 Oct; 67(10):1555-1559. PubMed ID: 31546479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of a Pilot Protocol for Detecting Infant Hyperopia.
    Morrison AM; Mutti DO
    Optom Vis Sci; 2023 May; 100(5):304-311. PubMed ID: 36951871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Performance of Plusoptix A09 Photo Screener in Refractive Error Screening in School Children Aged between 5 and 15 Years in the Southern Part of India.
    Prabhu AV; Thomas J; Ve RS; Biswas S
    J Curr Ophthalmol; 2020; 32(3):268-273. PubMed ID: 32775802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Photoscreener results with and without cycloplegia and their reliability according to biometric parameters.
    Guler Alis M; Alis A
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2022 Jan; 45(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 34924211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The efficacy of photoscreening for amblyopiagenic factors in a high risk population.
    Enzenauer RW
    Binocul Vis Strabismus Q; 2003; 18(4):233-40. PubMed ID: 14653776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Does assessing eye alignment along with refractive error or visual acuity increase sensitivity for detection of strabismus in preschool vision screening?
    Vision in Preschoolers Study Group
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Jul; 48(7):3115-25. PubMed ID: 17591881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Screening for amblyopia risk factors in pre-verbal children using the Plusoptix photoscreener: a cross-sectional population-based study.
    Moghaddam AA; Kargozar A; Zarei-Ghanavati M; Najjaran M; Nozari V; Shakeri MT
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2012 Jan; 96(1):83-6. PubMed ID: 21515564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Clinical correlation between automated vision screening under cycloplegia and retinoscopy in young children.
    Geremias A; Garcia NP; Moreira CAS; Barboza GNC; Barboza MNC
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2023; 86(3):232-239. PubMed ID: 35417522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Anterior chamber depth and axial length affect clinical performance of Spot Vision Screener.
    Yakar K
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2020; 83(1):43-47. PubMed ID: 31664336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Prevalence of refractive error in Singaporean Chinese children: the strabismus, amblyopia, and refractive error in young Singaporean Children (STARS) study.
    Dirani M; Chan YH; Gazzard G; Hornbeak DM; Leo SW; Selvaraj P; Zhou B; Young TL; Mitchell P; Varma R; Wong TY; Saw SM
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Mar; 51(3):1348-55. PubMed ID: 19933197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cycloplegic autorefraction results in pre-school children using the Nikon Retinomax Plus and the Welch Allyn SureSight.
    Steele G; Ireland D; Block S
    Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Aug; 80(8):573-7. PubMed ID: 12917576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Can photoscreening effectively detect amblyogenic risk factors in children with neurodevelopmental disability?
    Neena R; Gopan A; Nasheetha A; Giridhar A
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2022 Jan; 70(1):228-232. PubMed ID: 34937243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Risk factors for amblyopia in the vision in preschoolers study.
    Pascual M; Huang J; Maguire MG; Kulp MT; Quinn GE; Ciner E; Cyert LA; Orel-Bixler D; Moore B; Ying GS;
    Ophthalmology; 2014 Mar; 121(3):622-9.e1. PubMed ID: 24140117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Performance of the 2WIN Photoscreener With "CR" Strabismus Estimation in High-Risk Patients.
    Arnold SL; Arnold AW; Sprano JH; Arnold RW
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2019 Nov; 207():195-203. PubMed ID: 31077668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The UCI EyeMobile Preschool Vision Screening Program: Refractive Error and Amblyopia Results from the 2019-2020 School Year.
    Hunter SC; He J; Han M; Suh DW
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2022; 16():4249-4255. PubMed ID: 36573233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of photorefraction, autorefractometry and retinoscopy in children.
    Demirci G; Arslan B; Özsütçü M; Eliaçık M; Gulkilik G
    Int Ophthalmol; 2014 Aug; 34(4):739-46. PubMed ID: 24114503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Is noncycloplegic photorefraction applicable for screening refractive amblyopia risk factors?
    Rajavi Z; Parsafar H; Ramezani A; Yaseri M
    J Ophthalmic Vis Res; 2012 Jan; 7(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 22737380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.