BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

827 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29882082)

  • 1. Extending Causality Tests with Genetic Instruments: An Integration of Mendelian Randomization with the Classical Twin Design.
    Minică CC; Dolan CV; Boomsma DI; de Geus E; Neale MC
    Behav Genet; 2018 Jul; 48(4):337-349. PubMed ID: 29882082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression.
    Bowden J; Davey Smith G; Burgess S
    Int J Epidemiol; 2015 Apr; 44(2):512-25. PubMed ID: 26050253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Weak and pleiotropy robust sex-stratified Mendelian randomization in the one sample and two sample settings.
    Karageorgiou V; Tyrrell J; Mckinley TJ; Bowden J
    Genet Epidemiol; 2023 Mar; 47(2):135-151. PubMed ID: 36682072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Extending the MR-Egger method for multivariable Mendelian randomization to correct for both measured and unmeasured pleiotropy.
    Rees JMB; Wood AM; Burgess S
    Stat Med; 2017 Dec; 36(29):4705-4718. PubMed ID: 28960498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Empirical comparisons of multiple Mendelian randomization approaches in the presence of assortative mating.
    Minică CC; Boomsma DI; Dolan CV; de Geus E; Neale MC
    Int J Epidemiol; 2020 Aug; 49(4):1185-1193. PubMed ID: 32155257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Power, measurement error, and pleiotropy robustness in twin-design extensions to Mendelian Randomization.
    Castro-de-Araujo LF; Singh M; Zhou Y; Vinh P; Maes HH; Verhulst B; Dolan CV; Neale MC
    Res Sq; 2023 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 37886585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Polygenic Mendelian Randomization.
    Dudbridge F
    Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med; 2021 Feb; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 32229610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Profile-likelihood Bayesian model averaging for two-sample summary data Mendelian randomization in the presence of horizontal pleiotropy.
    Shapland CY; Zhao Q; Bowden J
    Stat Med; 2022 Mar; 41(6):1100-1119. PubMed ID: 35060160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robust inference in summary data Mendelian randomization via the zero modal pleiotropy assumption.
    Hartwig FP; Davey Smith G; Bowden J
    Int J Epidemiol; 2017 Dec; 46(6):1985-1998. PubMed ID: 29040600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Constrained instruments and their application to Mendelian randomization with pleiotropy.
    Jiang L; Oualkacha K; Didelez V; Ciampi A; Rosa-Neto P; Benedet AL; Mathotaarachchi S; Richards JB; Greenwood CMT;
    Genet Epidemiol; 2019 Jun; 43(4):373-401. PubMed ID: 30635941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pleiotropy-robust Mendelian randomization.
    van Kippersluis H; Rietveld CA
    Int J Epidemiol; 2018 Aug; 47(4):1279-1288. PubMed ID: 28338774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interpreting findings from Mendelian randomization using the MR-Egger method.
    Burgess S; Thompson SG
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2017 May; 32(5):377-389. PubMed ID: 28527048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of nonrandom selection mechanisms on the causal effect estimation for two-sample Mendelian randomization methods.
    Yu Y; Hou L; Shi X; Sun X; Liu X; Yu Y; Yuan Z; Li H; Xue F
    PLoS Genet; 2022 Mar; 18(3):e1010107. PubMed ID: 35298462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detecting pleiotropy in Mendelian randomisation studies with summary data and a continuous outcome.
    Greco M FD; Minelli C; Sheehan NA; Thompson JR
    Stat Med; 2015 Sep; 34(21):2926-40. PubMed ID: 25950993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mendelian randomization for causal inference accounting for pleiotropy and sample structure using genome-wide summary statistics.
    Hu X; Zhao J; Lin Z; Wang Y; Peng H; Zhao H; Wan X; Yang C
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Jul; 119(28):e2106858119. PubMed ID: 35787050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fetal Origins of Mental Disorders? An Answer Based on Mendelian Randomization.
    Arafat S; Minică CC
    Twin Res Hum Genet; 2018 Dec; 21(6):485-494. PubMed ID: 30587273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating the current state of Mendelian randomization studies: a protocol for a systematic review on methodological and clinical aspects using neurodegenerative disorders as outcome.
    Grover S; Del Greco M F; König IR
    Syst Rev; 2018 Sep; 7(1):145. PubMed ID: 30249280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inferring the direction of a causal link and estimating its effect via a Bayesian Mendelian randomization approach.
    Bucur IG; Claassen T; Heskes T
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Apr; 29(4):1081-1111. PubMed ID: 31146640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Bayesian approach to Mendelian randomization using summary statistics in the univariable and multivariable settings with correlated pleiotropy.
    Grant AJ; Burgess S
    Am J Hum Genet; 2024 Jan; 111(1):165-180. PubMed ID: 38181732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of allele scores as instrumental variables for Mendelian randomization.
    Burgess S; Thompson SG
    Int J Epidemiol; 2013 Aug; 42(4):1134-44. PubMed ID: 24062299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 42.