133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29883519)
1. There is no right to the death of the fetus.
Hendricks P
Bioethics; 2018 Jul; 32(6):395-397. PubMed ID: 29883519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ectogenesis and a right to the death of the prenatal human being: A reply to Räsänen.
Kaczor C
Bioethics; 2018 Nov; 32(9):634-638. PubMed ID: 30252944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ectogenesis and the case against the right to the death of the foetus.
Blackshaw BP; Rodger D
Bioethics; 2019 Jan; 33(1):76-81. PubMed ID: 30341923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ectogenesis, abortion and a right to the death of the fetus.
Räsänen J
Bioethics; 2017 Nov; 31(9):697-702. PubMed ID: 29044695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Why a right to life rules out infanticide: A final reply to Räsänen.
Blackshaw BP; Rodger D
Bioethics; 2019 Oct; 33(8):965-967. PubMed ID: 31389040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is There a Right to the Death of the Foetus?
Mathison E; Davis J
Bioethics; 2017 May; 31(4):313-320. PubMed ID: 28182294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pregnant people, inseminators and tissues of human origin: how ectogenesis challenges the concept of abortion.
Kendal E
Monash Bioeth Rev; 2020 Dec; 38(2):197-204. PubMed ID: 33175992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Abortion Rights after Artificial Wombs: Why Decriminalisation is Needed Ahead of Ectogenesis.
Horn C
Med Law Rev; 2021 Aug; 29(1):80-105. PubMed ID: 34370037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Schrödinger's fetus examined.
Blackshaw BP
Med Health Care Philos; 2020 Jun; 23(2):321-323. PubMed ID: 31834552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Abortion ethics.
Fromer MJ
Nurs Outlook; 1982 Apr; 30(4):234-40. PubMed ID: 7041095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Commentary on 'Gestation, Equality and Freedom: Ectogenesis as a Political Perspective'.
Cohen IG
J Med Ethics; 2020 Feb; 46(2):87-88. PubMed ID: 32015016
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The Perfect Womb: Promoting Equality of (Fetal) Opportunity.
Kendal E
J Bioeth Inq; 2017 Jun; 14(2):185-194. PubMed ID: 28224271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Critique of Henrik Friberg-Fernros's Defense of the Substance View.
Simkulet W
Bioethics; 2016 Nov; 30(9):767-773. PubMed ID: 27687985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Gestation, equality and freedom: ectogenesis as a political perspective.
Cavaliere G
J Med Ethics; 2020 Feb; 46(2):76-82. PubMed ID: 31704782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The path toward ectogenesis: looking beyond the technical challenges.
Segers S
BMC Med Ethics; 2021 May; 22(1):59. PubMed ID: 33985480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Why bother the public? A critique of Leslie Cannold's empirical research on ectogenesis.
Smajdor A
Theor Med Bioeth; 2021 Aug; 42(3-4):155-168. PubMed ID: 34846609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Artificial Wombs and Abortion Rights.
Cohen IG
Hastings Cent Rep; 2017 Jul; 47(4):inside back cover. PubMed ID: 28749060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The parenthood argument.
Simkulet W
Bioethics; 2018 Jan; 32(1):10-15. PubMed ID: 29171657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Twin pregnancy reduction is not an 'all or nothing' problem: a response to Räsänen.
Begović D; Romanis EC; Verweij EJ
J Med Ethics; 2022 Feb; 48(2):139-141. PubMed ID: 34183460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evictionism, Libertarianism, and Duties of the Fetus.
Dominiak Ł; Wysocki I
J Med Philos; 2023 Nov; 48(6):527-540. PubMed ID: 37395500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
