133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29883519)
21. The future-like-ours argument, animalism, and mereological universalism.
Sauchelli A
Bioethics; 2018 Mar; 32(3):199-204. PubMed ID: 29369389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. From the maternal uterus to the "uterus device"? Ethical and scientific considerations on partial ectogenesis.
Zaami S; Gullo G; Varone MC; Umani Ronchi F; Montanari Vergallo G
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2021 Dec; 25(23):7354-7362. PubMed ID: 34919235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A critique of "the best secular argument against abortion".
Strong C
J Med Ethics; 2008 Oct; 34(10):727-31. PubMed ID: 18827103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Ectogenesis rescue case: a reply to Hendricks.
Simkulet W
J Med Ethics; 2023 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 37734907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Artificial wombs, birth and 'birth': a response to Romanis.
Colgrove N
J Med Ethics; 2020 Aug; 46(8):554-556. PubMed ID: 31662482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. "Conservative" views of abortion.
Devine PE
Adv Bioeth; 1997; 2():183-202. PubMed ID: 12348327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Responding to Simkulet's objections to the two tragedies argument.
Friberg-Fernros H
J Med Ethics; 2020 Mar; 46(3):223-224. PubMed ID: 31699810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The Roman Catholic position on abortion.
Barry R
Adv Bioeth; 1997; 2():151-82. PubMed ID: 12348326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The impairment argument for the immorality of abortion revisited.
Blackshaw BP
Bioethics; 2020 Feb; 34(2):211-213. PubMed ID: 31788824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Abortion for fetal CNS malformations: religious aspects.
Steinberg A
Childs Nerv Syst; 2003 Aug; 19(7-8):592-5. PubMed ID: 12879344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Borowski v. Attorney General of Canada, 9 March 1989.
Canada. Supreme Court
Annu Rev Popul Law; 1989; 16():26. PubMed ID: 12344355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis.
Peterfy A
J Leg Med; 1995 Dec; 16(4):607-36. PubMed ID: 8568420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Should vegans have children? A response to Räsänen.
Austin-Eames L
Theor Med Bioeth; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38740724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Ectogenesis and the value of gestational ties.
Kennedy S
Bioethics; 2024 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 38183623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Ensuring a stillborn: the ethics of fetal lethal injection in late abortion.
Callahan JC
J Clin Ethics; 1995; 6(3):254-63. PubMed ID: 8605389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Criminal liability of physicians: an encroachment on the abortion right?
Barber RA
Am Crim Law Rev; 1981; 18(4):591-615. PubMed ID: 11655468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Challenging the principle of proportionality.
Andersson AK
J Med Ethics; 2016 Apr; 42(4):242-5. PubMed ID: 26839114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Moving forwards: A problem for full ectogenesis.
Baron T
Bioethics; 2021 Jun; 35(5):407-413. PubMed ID: 33587328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Tremblay v. Daigle, 8 August 1989.
Canada. Supreme Court
Annu Rev Popul Law; 1989; 16():26. PubMed ID: 12344357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Abortion: a fundamental right.
Gangoli G
Issues Med Ethics; 2000; 8(4):104. PubMed ID: 16323370
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
