These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29884112)

  • 1. Research methods in performance validity testing studies: Criterion grouping approach impacts study outcomes.
    Schroeder RW; Martin PK; Heinrichs RJ; Baade LE
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2019 Apr; 33(3):466-477. PubMed ID: 29884112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Psychometric implications of failure on one performance validity test: a cross-validation study to inform criterion group definition.
    Rhoads T; Neale AC; Resch ZJ; Cohen CD; Keezer RD; Cerny BM; Jennette KJ; Ovsiew GP; Soble JR
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2021 Jul; 43(5):437-448. PubMed ID: 34233580
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Failing The b Test: The influence of cutoff scores and criterion group approaches in a sample of adults referred for psychoeducational evaluation.
    Robinson A; Huber M; Breaux E; Pugh E; Calamia M
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2022 Nov; 44(9):619-626. PubMed ID: 36727266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use of multiple performance and symptom validity measures: Determining the optimal per test cutoff for determination of invalidity, analysis of skew, and inter-test correlations in valid and invalid performance groups.
    Larrabee GJ; Rohling ML; Meyers JE
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2019 Nov; 33(8):1354-1372. PubMed ID: 31111775
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Aggregating validity indicators: The salience of domain specificity and the indeterminate range in multivariate models of performance validity assessment.
    Erdodi LA
    Appl Neuropsychol Adult; 2019; 26(2):155-172. PubMed ID: 29111772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the classification accuracy of multiple performance validity tests in a mixed clinical sample.
    Messerly J; Soble JR; Webber TA; Alverson WA; Fullen C; Kraemer LD; Marceaux JC
    Appl Neuropsychol Adult; 2021; 28(6):727-736. PubMed ID: 31835915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of criterion measures on the classification accuracy of TOMM-1.
    Rai JK; Erdodi LA
    Appl Neuropsychol Adult; 2021; 28(2):185-196. PubMed ID: 31187632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Derivation of New Embedded Performance Validity Indicators for the Child and Adolescent Memory Profile (ChAMP) Objects Subtest in Youth with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.
    Brooks BL; MacAllister WS; Fay-McClymont TB; Vasserman M; Sherman EMS
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2019 Jun; 34(4):531-538. PubMed ID: 30124740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cross-validation of three Advanced Clinical Solutions performance validity tests: Examining combinations of measures to maximize classification of invalid performance.
    Bain KM; Soble JR; Webber TA; Messerly JM; Bailey KC; Kirton JW; McCoy KJM
    Appl Neuropsychol Adult; 2021; 28(1):24-34. PubMed ID: 30987451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cognitive impairment does not cause invalid performance: analyzing performance patterns among cognitively unimpaired, impaired, and noncredible participants across six performance validity tests.
    Critchfield E; Soble JR; Marceaux JC; Bain KM; Chase Bailey K; Webber TA; Alex Alverson W; Messerly J; Andrés González D; O'Rourke JJF
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2019 Aug; 33(6):1083-1101. PubMed ID: 30475095
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparisons of five performance validity indices in bona fide and simulated traumatic brain injury.
    Bashem JR; Rapport LJ; Miller JB; Hanks RA; Axelrod BN; Millis SR
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2014; 28(5):851-75. PubMed ID: 24983387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance validity in undergraduate research participants: a comparison of failure rates across tests and cutoffs.
    An KY; Kaploun K; Erdodi LA; Abeare CA
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2017 Jan; 31(1):193-206. PubMed ID: 27687709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Suspiciously slow: timed digit span as an embedded performance validity measure in a sample of veterans with mTBI.
    Gabel NM; Waldron-Perrine B; Spencer RJ; Pangilinan PH; Hale AC; Bieliauskas LA
    Brain Inj; 2019; 33(3):377-382. PubMed ID: 30526120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lowered cutoffs to reduce false positives on the Word Memory Test.
    Rohling ML; Demakis GJ; Langhinrichsen-Rohling J
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2024 Feb; 46(1):67-79. PubMed ID: 38362939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validation of the Advanced Clinical Solutions Word Choice Test (WCT) in a Mixed Clinical Sample: Establishing Classification Accuracy, Sensitivity/Specificity, and Cutoff Scores.
    Bain KM; Soble JR
    Assessment; 2019 Oct; 26(7):1320-1328. PubMed ID: 28836450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. CVLT-II Forced Choice Recognition Trial as an Embedded Validity Indicator: A Systematic Review of the Evidence.
    Schwartz ES; Erdodi L; Rodriguez N; Ghosh JJ; Curtain JR; Flashman LA; Roth RM
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2016 Sep; 22(8):851-8. PubMed ID: 27619108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Medical Evaluation Board Involvement, Non-Credible Cognitive Testing, and Emotional Response Bias in Concussed Service Members.
    Mooney SR; Stafford J; Seats E
    Mil Med; 2018 Nov; 183(11-12):e546-e554. PubMed ID: 29590406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance validity in the dementia clinic: Specificity of validity tests when used individually and in aggregate across levels of cognitive impairment severity.
    Martin PK; Schroeder RW; Olsen DH
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2022 Jan; 36(1):165-188. PubMed ID: 32552601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Utility of various WAIS-IV Digit Span indices for identifying noncredible performance validity among cognitively impaired and unimpaired examinees.
    Webber TA; Soble JR
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2018 May; 32(4):657-670. PubMed ID: 29256334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing two models of performance validity assessment in patients with Parkinson's disease who are candidates for deep brain stimulation surgery.
    Wodushek TR; Domen CH
    Appl Neuropsychol Adult; 2020; 27(1):9-21. PubMed ID: 30183361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.