288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29884338)
1. Effects of Different Glide Path Files on Apical Debris Extrusion in Curved Root Canals.
Gunes B; Yesildal Yeter K
J Endod; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1191-1194. PubMed ID: 29884338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparative study of root canal preparation using Profile .04 and Lightspeed rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
Versümer J; Hülsmann M; Schäfers F
Int Endod J; 2002 Jan; 35(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 11853237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of apical extrusion of intracanal bacteria by various glide-path establishing systems: an
Dagna A; El Abed R; Hussain S; Abu-Tahun IH; Visai L; Bertoglio F; Bosco F; Beltrami R; Poggio C; Kim HC
Restor Dent Endod; 2017 Nov; 42(4):316-323. PubMed ID: 29142880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of shaping ability of kedo-S square and fanta AF™ baby rotary files compared to manual K-files in root canal preparation of primary anterior teeth.
El-Desouky SS; El Fahl BN; Kabbash IA; Hadwa SM
Clin Oral Investig; 2024 May; 28(6):340. PubMed ID: 38801642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative Evaluation of Debris Expulsion Beyond Apex During Re-root Canal Treatment by Utilizing Two Re-treatment Rotary Files and Two Reciprocating Files: An In-Vitro Study.
Raj R A; Raju I; Varghese JG; Jeet Singh Birring O; Paul Yacob PJ; Chohan H
Cureus; 2024 Mar; 16(3):e56467. PubMed ID: 38638748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Apical extrusion of debris by manual and mechanical instrumentation.
Leonardi LE; Atlas DM; Raiden G
Braz Dent J; 2007; 18(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 17639194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Comparison of Preparation Times between Manual, Rotary, and Reciprocating Files in Primary Molar Pulpectomy.
Middleton I; Vorster M; van der Vyver PJ
Indian J Dent Res; 2024 Jan; 35(1):45-48. PubMed ID: 38934748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Apically-extruded debris using the ProTaper system.
Azar NG; Ebrahimi G
Aust Endod J; 2005 Apr; 31(1):21-3. PubMed ID: 15881729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of Different Glidepath Techniques on the Overall Performance of WaveOne Gold in an Artificial S-Shape Canal.
Lup VM; Marcu OA; Gaeta C; Ciavoi G
Dent J (Basel); 2024 Jun; 12(6):. PubMed ID: 38920883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A reconstructed computerized tomographic comparison of Ni-Ti rotary GT files versus traditional instruments in canals shaped by novice operators.
Gluskin AH; Brown DC; Buchanan LS
Int Endod J; 2001 Sep; 34(6):476-84. PubMed ID: 11556516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Apically extruded debris with three contemporary Ni-Ti instrumentation systems: an ex vivo comparative study.
Logani A; Shah N
Indian J Dent Res; 2008; 19(3):182-5. PubMed ID: 18797091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cone-beam computed tomography analysis of the apical third of curved roots after mechanical preparation with different automated systems.
Oliveira CA; Meurer MI; Pascoalato C; Silva SR
Braz Dent J; 2009; 20(5):376-81. PubMed ID: 20126905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the Shaping Ability of WaveOne Reciprocating Files with or without Glide Path in Simulated Curved S-shaped Root Canals.
Yilmaz A; Kucukay ES; Istektepe M; Sisli SN; Ersev H; Karagoz-Kucukay I
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent; 2017 Jun; 7(Suppl 1):S13-S17. PubMed ID: 28713762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Microcomputed tomography analysis of curved root canal preparation when coronal flaring and glide path files used with heat-treated nickel titanium rotary files.
AbuMostafa A; Alrefaie MM; Abu-Mostafa N; Algahtani FN
PLoS One; 2024; 19(4):e0299896. PubMed ID: 38568900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The influence of a manual glide path on the separation rate of NiTi rotary instruments.
Patiño PV; Biedma BM; Liébana CR; Cantatore G; Bahillo JG
J Endod; 2005 Feb; 31(2):114-6. PubMed ID: 15671822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of Movement Kinematics and Heat-Treated Alloys on the Apical Extrusion of Debris: An In Vitro Study.
Kaşıkçı S; Türker SA
Niger J Clin Pract; 2024 Jun; 27(6):774-778. PubMed ID: 38943303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An in vitro evaluation of the accuracy of Dentaport ZX apex locator in enlarged root canals.
Ebrahim AK; Wadachi R; Suda H
Aust Dent J; 2007 Sep; 52(3):193-7. PubMed ID: 17969287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Canal Transportation and Centring Ability of Reciproc and Reciproc Blue With or Without Use of Glide Path Instruments: A CBCT Study.
Hage W; Zogheib C; Bukiet F; Sfeir G; Khalil I; Gergi R; Naaman A
Eur Endod J; 2020; 5(2):118-122. PubMed ID: 32766521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of the shaping characteristics of two nickel-titanium endodontic hand instruments.
Dobó-Nagy C; Serbán T; Szabó J; Nagy G; Madléna M
Int Endod J; 2002 Mar; 35(3):283-8. PubMed ID: 11985681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative analysis of curved root canal preparation using nickel-titanium instruments with or without EDTA.
Bramante CM; Betti LV
J Endod; 2000 May; 26(5):278-80. PubMed ID: 11199735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
