206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29884841)
1. Comprehensive annotation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 missense variants by functionally validated sequence-based computational prediction models.
Hart SN; Hoskin T; Shimelis H; Moore RM; Feng B; Thomas A; Lindor NM; Polley EC; Goldgar DE; Iversen E; Monteiro ANA; Suman VJ; Couch FJ
Genet Med; 2019 Jan; 21(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 29884841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. BRCA1 and BRCA2 unclassified variants and missense polymorphisms in Algerian breast/ovarian cancer families.
Cherbal F; Salhi N; Bakour R; Adane S; Boualga K; Maillet P
Dis Markers; 2012; 32(6):343-53. PubMed ID: 22684231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Systematic misclassification of missense variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 "coldspots".
Dines JN; Shirts BH; Slavin TP; Walsh T; King MC; Fowler DM; Pritchard CC
Genet Med; 2020 May; 22(5):825-830. PubMed ID: 31911673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. DNA repair-related functional assays for the classification of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants: a critical review and needs assessment.
Toland AE; Andreassen PR
J Med Genet; 2017 Nov; 54(11):721-731. PubMed ID: 28866612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In silico analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 missense variants and the relevance in molecular genetic testing.
Poon KS
Sci Rep; 2021 May; 11(1):11114. PubMed ID: 34045478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical and molecular characterization of the BRCA2 p.Asn3124Ile variant reveals substantial evidence for pathogenic significance.
Surowy HM; Sutter C; Mittnacht M; Klaes R; Schaefer D; Evers C; Burgemeister AL; Goehringer C; Dikow N; Heil J; Golatta M; Schott S; Schneeweiss A; Bugert P; Sohn C; Bartram CR; Burwinkel B
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2014 Jun; 145(2):451-60. PubMed ID: 24728577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. BRCA1/2 missense mutations and the value of in-silico analyses.
Sadowski CE; Kohlstedt D; Meisel C; Keller K; Becker K; Mackenroth L; Rump A; Schröck E; Wimberger P; Kast K
Eur J Med Genet; 2017 Nov; 60(11):572-577. PubMed ID: 28807866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance of in silico prediction tools for the classification of rare BRCA1/2 missense variants in clinical diagnostics.
Ernst C; Hahnen E; Engel C; Nothnagel M; Weber J; Schmutzler RK; Hauke J
BMC Med Genomics; 2018 Mar; 11(1):35. PubMed ID: 29580235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Missense variants of uncertain significance (VUS) altering the phosphorylation patterns of BRCA1 and BRCA2.
Tram E; Savas S; Ozcelik H
PLoS One; 2013; 8(5):e62468. PubMed ID: 23704879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of uncertain significance in patients with breast cancer: a multifactorial probability-based model versus ACMG standards and guidelines for interpreting sequence variants.
Park KS; Cho EY; Nam SJ; Ki CS; Kim JW
Genet Med; 2016 Dec; 18(12):1250-1257. PubMed ID: 27124784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. BRCA1- and BRCA2-specific in silico tools for variant interpretation in the CAGI 5 ENIGMA challenge.
Padilla N; Moles-Fernández A; Riera C; Montalban G; Özkan S; Ootes L; Bonache S; Díez O; Gutiérrez-Enríquez S; de la Cruz X
Hum Mutat; 2019 Sep; 40(9):1593-1611. PubMed ID: 31112341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Variants of uncertain significance in BRCA1 and BRCA2 assessment of in silico analysis and a proposal for communication in genetic counselling.
Moghadasi S; Hofland N; Wouts JN; Hogervorst FB; Wijnen JT; Vreeswijk MP; van Asperen CJ
J Med Genet; 2013 Feb; 50(2):74-9. PubMed ID: 23231788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Towards a New, Endophenotype-Based Strategy for Pathogenicity Prediction in BRCA1 and BRCA2: In Silico Modeling of the Outcome of HDR/SGE Assays for Missense Variants.
Özkan S; Padilla N; de la Cruz X
Int J Mol Sci; 2021 Jun; 22(12):. PubMed ID: 34207612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of the Clinical Relevance of BRCA2 Missense Variants by Functional and Computational Approaches.
Guidugli L; Shimelis H; Masica DL; Pankratz VS; Lipton GB; Singh N; Hu C; Monteiro ANA; Lindor NM; Goldgar DE; Karchin R; Iversen ES; Couch FJ
Am J Hum Genet; 2018 Feb; 102(2):233-248. PubMed ID: 29394989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Understanding and predicting the functional consequences of missense mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2.
Aljarf R; Shen M; Pires DEV; Ascher DB
Sci Rep; 2022 Jun; 12(1):10458. PubMed ID: 35729312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16.
Khandakji M; Habish HHA; Abdulla NBS; Kusasi SAA; Abdou NMG; Al-Mulla HMMA; Al Sulaiman RJAA; Bu Jassoum SM; Mifsud B
Physiol Genomics; 2023 Aug; 55(8):315-323. PubMed ID: 37335020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pathogenicity evaluation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 unclassified variants identified in Portuguese breast/ovarian cancer families.
Santos C; Peixoto A; Rocha P; Pinto P; Bizarro S; Pinheiro M; Pinto C; Henrique R; Teixeira MR
J Mol Diagn; 2014 May; 16(3):324-34. PubMed ID: 24607278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Functional evaluation of BRCA1/2 variants of unknown significance with homologous recombination assay and integrative in silico prediction model.
Guo Q; Ji S; Takeuchi K; Urasaki W; Suzuki A; Iwasaki Y; Saito H; Xu Z; Arai M; Nakamura S; Momozawa Y; Chiba N; Miki Y; Matsuura M; Sunada S
J Hum Genet; 2023 Dec; 68(12):849-857. PubMed ID: 37731132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Characterization of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants found in a Norwegian breast or ovarian cancer cohort.
Jarhelle E; Riise Stensland HM; Mæhle L; Van Ghelue M
Fam Cancer; 2017 Jan; 16(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 27495310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of proactive high-throughput functional assay data on BRCA1 variant interpretation in 3684 patients with breast or ovarian cancer.
Kim HK; Lee EJ; Lee YJ; Kim J; Kim Y; Kim K; Lee SW; Chang S; Lee YJ; Lee JW; Lee W; Chun S; Son BH; Jung KH; Kim YM; Min WK; Ahn SH
J Hum Genet; 2020 Mar; 65(3):209-220. PubMed ID: 31907386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
