These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29886173)

  • 1. Systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy in CMI.
    Leeflang MMG; Kraaijpoel N
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2018 Nov; 24(11):1115-1116. PubMed ID: 29886173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy: The PRISMA-DTA Statement.
    Frank RA; Bossuyt PM; McInnes MDF
    Radiology; 2018 Nov; 289(2):313-314. PubMed ID: 30015590
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Knowing how to read a scientific article. 4. Knowing how to apply a diagnostic test].
    Coggiola M; Bobbio M; Bongioanni S; Demichelis B; Longo M
    G Ital Cardiol; 1995 Sep; 25(9):1211-22. PubMed ID: 8529859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Guidance was developed on how to write a plain language summary for diagnostic test accuracy reviews.
    Whiting P; Leeflang M; de Salis I; Mustafa RA; Santesso N; Gopalakrishna G; Cooney G; Jesper E; Thomas J; Davenport C
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Nov; 103():112-119. PubMed ID: 30036677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing variability in results in systematic reviews of diagnostic studies.
    Naaktgeboren CA; Ochodo EA; Van Enst WA; de Groot JAH; Hooft L; Leeflang MMG; Bossuyt PM; Moons KGM; Reitsma JB
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Jan; 16():6. PubMed ID: 26772804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Investigating the accuracy, risk impact, and cost-effectiveness of component-resolved diagnostic test for food allergy: a systematic review protocol.
    Kim JF; Nwaru BI; McCleary N; Stoddart A; Sheikh A
    NPJ Prim Care Respir Med; 2017 Feb; 27(1):10. PubMed ID: 28184046
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 5. Diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Manchikanti L; Derby R; Wolfer L; Singh V; Datta S; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(3):517-40. PubMed ID: 19461821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Synthesizing Evidence from Diagnostic Accuracy TEsts: the SEDATE guideline.
    Sotiriadis A; Papatheodorou SI; Martins WP
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Mar; 47(3):386-95. PubMed ID: 26411461
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy.
    Leeflang MM
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2014 Feb; 20(2):105-13. PubMed ID: 24274632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: Part 7: systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Manchikanti L; Derby R; Wolfer L; Singh V; Datta S; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(6):929-63. PubMed ID: 19935980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating medical tests: introducing the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy.
    Bossuyt PM; Deeks JJ; Leeflang MM; Takwoingi Y; Flemyng E
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2023 Jul; 7(7):ED000163. PubMed ID: 37470764
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Systematic reviews of diagnostic tests in cancer: review of methods and reporting.
    Mallett S; Deeks JJ; Halligan S; Hopewell S; Cornelius V; Altman DG
    BMJ; 2006 Aug; 333(7565):413. PubMed ID: 16849365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Eligibility criteria in systematic reviews published in prominent medical journals: a methodological review.
    McCrae N; Purssell E
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2015 Dec; 21(6):1052-8. PubMed ID: 26370723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The methodological quality of diagnostic test accuracy studies for musculoskeletal conditions can be improved.
    Henschke N; Keuerleber J; Ferreira M; Maher CG; Verhagen AP
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Apr; 67(4):416-24. PubMed ID: 24581295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quality assessment in systematic reviews comparing the diagnostic accuracy of multiple tests.
    Leeflang MMG
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2022 May; 28(5):629-630. PubMed ID: 35176474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. There is nothing staid about STARD: progress in the reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Johnston KC; Holloway RG
    Neurology; 2006 Sep; 67(5):740-1. PubMed ID: 16966532
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Diagnostic tests--use and interpretation].
    Asberg A
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1993 Feb; 113(5):604-8. PubMed ID: 8465320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Methodological bias and variation of systematic reviews on diagnostic test accuracy].
    Li ZX; Yang ZR; Xiang X; Gao P; Shu Z; Huang YS; Cao Y; Sun F; Zhan SY
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Feb; 37(2):286-90. PubMed ID: 26917532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Guidelines for reporting information in studies of diagnostic test accuracy: the STARD initiative.
    Meyer GJ
    J Pers Assess; 2003 Dec; 81(3):191-3. PubMed ID: 14638443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Publishing nutrition research: validity, reliability, and diagnostic test assessment in nutrition-related research.
    Gleason PM; Harris J; Sheean PM; Boushey CJ; Bruemmer B
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2010 Mar; 110(3):409-19. PubMed ID: 20184991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.