These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29886630)

  • 21. Two-Year Clinical Evaluation of a Nanofilled Etch-and-Rinse and a Self-Etch Adhesive System Containing MDPB and Fluoride in Non-carious Cervical Lesions.
    de Oliveira FG; Machado LS; Sundfeld-Neto D; Giannini M; Briso AL; Dos Santos PH; Sundefeld ML; Sundfeld RH
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2017 Mar; 38(3):e1-e4. PubMed ID: 28257217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Strength of the bond as a predictor of marginal performance: an in vitro evaluation of contemporary adhesives.
    Bortolotto T; Mileo A; Krejci I
    Dent Mater; 2010 Mar; 26(3):242-8. PubMed ID: 20005563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. One-step partial or complete caries removal and bonding with antibacterial or traditional self-etch adhesives: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Villat C; Attal JP; Brulat N; Decup F; Doméjean S; Dursun E; Fron-Chabouis H; Jacquot B; Muller Bolla M; Plasse-Pradelle N; Roche L; Maucort-Boulch D; Nony P; Gritsch K; Millet P; Gueyffier F; Grosgogeat B
    Trials; 2016 Aug; 17(1):404. PubMed ID: 27527342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Bond strength of restorative materials to hydroxyapatite inserts and dimensional changes of insert-containing restorations during polymerization.
    Lezaja M; Veljovic D; Manojlovic D; Milosevic M; Mitrovic N; Janackovic D; Miletic V
    Dent Mater; 2015 Feb; 31(2):171-81. PubMed ID: 25541508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Influence of operator experience on non-carious cervical lesion restorations: Clinical evaluation with different adhesive systems.
    Scotti N; Comba A; Gambino A; Manzon E; Breschi L; Paolino D; Pasqualini D; Berutti E
    Am J Dent; 2016 Feb; 29(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 27093774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Three-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance and wear of a nanocomposite versus a hybrid composite.
    Palaniappan S; Bharadwaj D; Mattar DL; Peumans M; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P
    Dent Mater; 2009 Nov; 25(11):1302-14. PubMed ID: 19577288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite.
    de Andrade OS; de Goes MF; Montes MA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Microleakage of two new dentin adhesives.
    Linden JJ; Swift EJ
    Am J Dent; 1994 Feb; 7(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 9115676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The role of adhesive materials and oral biofilm in the failure of adhesive resin restorations.
    Pinna R; Usai P; Filigheddu E; Garcia-Godoy F; Milia E
    Am J Dent; 2017 Oct; 30(5):285-292. PubMed ID: 29178733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Direct resin composite restorations versus indirect composite inlays: one-year results.
    Mendonça JS; Neto RG; Santiago SL; Lauris JR; Navarro MF; de Carvalho RM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 May; 11(3):025-32. PubMed ID: 20461321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A randomized controlled clinical trial of a HEMA-free all-in-one adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions at 1 year.
    Van Landuyt KL; Peumans M; Fieuws S; De Munck J; Cardoso MV; Ermis RB; Lambrechts P; Van Meerbeek B
    J Dent; 2008 Oct; 36(10):847-55. PubMed ID: 18656295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Clinical Performance of Different Solvent-based Dentin Adhesives With Nanofill or Nanohybrid Composites in Class III Restorations: Five Year Results.
    Demirci M; Tuncer S; Sancaklı HS; Tekçe N; Baydemir C
    Oper Dent; 2017; 42(4):E111-E120. PubMed ID: 28682703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Eighteen-month clinical performance of composite resin restorations with two different adhesive systems for molars affected by molar incisor hypomineralization.
    de Souza JF; Fragelli CB; Jeremias F; Paschoal MAB; Santos-Pinto L; de Cássia Loiola Cordeiro R
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Jun; 21(5):1725-1733. PubMed ID: 27743215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Methacrylate- and silorane-based composite restorations: hardness, depth of cure and interfacial gap formation as a function of the energy dose.
    D'Alpino PH; Bechtold J; dos Santos PJ; Alonso RC; Di Hipólito V; Silikas N; Rodrigues FP
    Dent Mater; 2011 Nov; 27(11):1162-9. PubMed ID: 21925724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Marginal microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations: effect of using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives.
    Khoroushi M; Karvandi TM; Kamali B; Mazaheri H
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 23059577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Marginal and internal adaptation of bulk-filled Class I and Cuspal coverage direct resin composite restorations.
    Stavridakis MM; Kakaboura AI; Ardu S; Krejci I
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 17910230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results.
    Neme AL; Evans DB; Maxson BB
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 11203864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of a filled adhesive on bond strength in three dentinal bonding systems.
    Fanning DE; Wakefield CW; Robbins JW; Bagley AL
    Gen Dent; 1995; 43(3):256-62. PubMed ID: 8940582
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of shear bond strength and interfacial micromorphology of direct restorations in primary and permanent teeth--an in vitro study.
    da Costa CC; Oshima HM; Costa Filho LC
    Gen Dent; 2008; 56(1):85-93; quiz 94-5, 111-2. PubMed ID: 18254567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Microleakage after thermocycling of 4 etch and rinse and 3 self-etch adhesives with and without a flowable composite lining.
    Guéders AM; Charpentier JF; Albert AI; Geerts SO
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):450-5. PubMed ID: 16924985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.