These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29886630)

  • 41. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
    Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
    J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Influence of the restorative technique and new adhesives on the dentin marginal seal and adaptation of resin composite Class II restorations: an in vitro evaluation.
    Dietschi D; De Siebenthal G; Neveu-Rosenstand L; Holz J
    Quintessence Int; 1995 Oct; 26(10):717-27. PubMed ID: 8935115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [Deep Margin Elevation for adhesive indirect restorations].
    Bresser RA; Cune MS; Gresnigt MMM
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2023 Feb; 130(2):85-88. PubMed ID: 36748681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Two-year clinical trial of a universal adhesive in total-etch and self-etch mode in non-carious cervical lesions.
    Lawson NC; Robles A; Fu CC; Lin CP; Sawlani K; Burgess JO
    J Dent; 2015 Oct; 43(10):1229-34. PubMed ID: 26231300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Can modern restorative procedures and materials reliably seal cavities? In vitro investigations. Part 1.
    Hilton TJ
    Am J Dent; 2002 Jun; 15(3):198-210. PubMed ID: 12469759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Two-year clinical performance of self-etching adhesive systems in composite restorations of anterior teeth.
    Barcellos DC; Batista GR; Silva MA; Pleffken PR; Rangel PM; Fernandes VV; Di Nicoló R; Torres CR
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(3):258-66. PubMed ID: 23110580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. 36-month clinical evaluation of two adhesives and microhybrid resin composites in Class I restorations.
    Swift EJ; Ritter AV; Heymann HO; Sturdevant JR; Wilder AD
    Am J Dent; 2008 Jun; 21(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 18686764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. An 18-months' evaluation of self-etch and etch & rinse adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions.
    Dalton Bittencourt D; Ezecelevski IG; Reis A; Van Dijken JW; Loguercio AD
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2005 Jun; 63(3):173-8. PubMed ID: 16191912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Clinical evaluation of Solitaire-2 restorations placed in United Kingdom general dental practices: 1-year report.
    Burke FJ; Crisp RJ; Bell TJ; McDermott K; Lamb JJ; Siddons C; Weller B; Balkenhol M
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Sep; 34(8):594-9. PubMed ID: 14620210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A clinical evaluation of a giomer restorative system containing surface prereacted glass ionomer filler: results from a 13-year recall examination.
    Gordan VV; Blaser PK; Watson RE; Mjör IA; McEdward DL; Sensi LG; Riley JL
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2014 Oct; 145(10):1036-43. PubMed ID: 25270702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Clinical evaluation of a low-shrinkage composite in posterior restorations: one-year results.
    Baracco B; Perdigão J; Cabrera E; Giráldez I; Ceballos L
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(2):117-29. PubMed ID: 22313275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Marginal and internal adaptation of composite restorations to dentin in vivo and in vitro.
    Hahn P; Weyen G; Fischer P; Plogmann S; Hannig M
    Am J Dent; 2008 Dec; 21(6):356-60. PubMed ID: 19146127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Selective enamel etching: effect on marginal adaptation of self-etch LED-cured bond systems in aged Class I composite restorations.
    Souza-Junior EJ; Prieto LT; Araújo CT; Paulillo LA
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(2):195-204. PubMed ID: 22313271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Degradation of thermo-mechanically loaded adhesive Class V restorations after 18 months of water storage.
    Bortolotto T; Ferrari M; Tay F; Krejci I
    Am J Dent; 2007 Apr; 20(2):83-9. PubMed ID: 17542200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Composite resin restorations: "in vitro" evaluation of three dentin adhesive systems].
    Toca E; Bonfil JJ; Pignoly C
    Inf Dent; 1991 Jun; 73(23):1865-73. PubMed ID: 1830292
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Comparative in vivo and in vitro investigation of interfacial bond variability.
    Hannig M; Friedrichs C
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 11203774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. 5-year clinical performance of resin composite versus resin modified glass ionomer restorative system in non-carious cervical lesions.
    Franco EB; Benetti AR; Ishikiriama SK; Santiago SL; Lauris JR; Jorge MF; Navarro MF
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):403-8. PubMed ID: 16924979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Dental adhesives--the foundation of esthetic dentistry.
    Tseng KC; Weinberg GA; Woodlock DF
    Gen Dent; 2007 Nov; 55(7):698-708; quiz 709-10, 712. PubMed ID: 18069514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Clinical evaluation of resin-based composites in posterior restorations: two-year results.
    Arhun N; Celik C; Yamanel K
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(4):397-404. PubMed ID: 20672723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Dentin-enamel adhesives in pediatric dentistry: an update.
    García-Godoy F; Donly KJ
    Pediatr Dent; 2015; 37(2):133-5. PubMed ID: 25905654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.