236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29887230)
21. Accurate Diabetes Risk Stratification Using Machine Learning: Role of Missing Value and Outliers.
Maniruzzaman M; Rahman MJ; Al-MehediHasan M; Suri HS; Abedin MM; El-Baz A; Suri JS
J Med Syst; 2018 Apr; 42(5):92. PubMed ID: 29637403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Predictive performance of machine and statistical learning methods: Impact of data-generating processes on external validity in the "large N, small p" setting.
Austin PC; Harrell FE; Steyerberg EW
Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 Jun; 30(6):1465-1483. PubMed ID: 33848231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Predicting 30-day Hospital Readmission with Publicly Available Administrative Database. A Conditional Logistic Regression Modeling Approach.
Zhu K; Lou Z; Zhou J; Ballester N; Kong N; Parikh P
Methods Inf Med; 2015; 54(6):560-7. PubMed ID: 26548400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A comparative study of logistic regression based machine learning techniques for prediction of early virological suppression in antiretroviral initiating HIV patients.
Bisaso KR; Karungi SA; Kiragga A; Mukonzo JK; Castelnuovo B
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2018 Sep; 18(1):77. PubMed ID: 30180893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Prediction of myopia development among Chinese school-aged children using refraction data from electronic medical records: A retrospective, multicentre machine learning study.
Lin H; Long E; Ding X; Diao H; Chen Z; Liu R; Huang J; Cai J; Xu S; Zhang X; Wang D; Chen K; Yu T; Wu D; Zhao X; Liu Z; Wu X; Jiang Y; Yang X; Cui D; Liu W; Zheng Y; Luo L; Wang H; Chan CC; Morgan IG; He M; Liu Y
PLoS Med; 2018 Nov; 15(11):e1002674. PubMed ID: 30399150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Machine Learning Methods for Identifying Critical Data Elements in Nursing Documentation.
Bose E; Maganti S; Bowles KH; Brueshoff BL; Monsen KA
Nurs Res; 2019; 68(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 30153212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Comparison of machine learning method and logistic regression model in prediction of acute kidney injury in severely burned patients].
Tang CQ; Li JQ; Xu DY; Liu XB; Hou WJ; Lyu KY; Xiao SC; Xia ZF
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi; 2018 Jun; 34(6):343-348. PubMed ID: 29961290
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. A comparative study of variable selection methods in the context of developing psychiatric screening instruments.
Lu F; Petkova E
Stat Med; 2014 Feb; 33(3):401-21. PubMed ID: 23934941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A machine learning-based framework to identify type 2 diabetes through electronic health records.
Zheng T; Xie W; Xu L; He X; Zhang Y; You M; Yang G; Chen Y
Int J Med Inform; 2017 Jan; 97():120-127. PubMed ID: 27919371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Computational prediction of diagnosis and feature selection on mesothelioma patient health records.
Chicco D; Rovelli C
PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0208737. PubMed ID: 30629589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Advancing In-Hospital Clinical Deterioration Prediction Models.
Jeffery AD; Dietrich MS; Fabbri D; Kennedy B; Novak LL; Coco J; Mion LC
Am J Crit Care; 2018 Sep; 27(5):381-391. PubMed ID: 30173171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Fetal health status prediction based on maternal clinical history using machine learning techniques.
Akbulut A; Ertugrul E; Topcu V
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Sep; 163():87-100. PubMed ID: 30119860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Assessing soil pH in Anhui Province based on different features mining methods combined with generalized boosted regression models].
Wang SH; Lu HL; Zhao MS; Zhou LM
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2020 Oct; 31(10):3509-3517. PubMed ID: 33314841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Multicenter Comparison of Machine Learning Methods and Conventional Regression for Predicting Clinical Deterioration on the Wards.
Churpek MM; Yuen TC; Winslow C; Meltzer DO; Kattan MW; Edelson DP
Crit Care Med; 2016 Feb; 44(2):368-74. PubMed ID: 26771782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Machine learning methods reveal the temporal pattern of dengue incidence using meteorological factors in metropolitan Manila, Philippines.
Carvajal TM; Viacrusis KM; Hernandez LFT; Ho HT; Amalin DM; Watanabe K
BMC Infect Dis; 2018 Apr; 18(1):183. PubMed ID: 29665781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Predicting factors for survival of breast cancer patients using machine learning techniques.
Ganggayah MD; Taib NA; Har YC; Lio P; Dhillon SK
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2019 Mar; 19(1):48. PubMed ID: 30902088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Improving the Spatial Prediction of Soil Organic Carbon Stocks in a Complex Tropical Mountain Landscape by Methodological Specifications in Machine Learning Approaches.
Ließ M; Schmidt J; Glaser B
PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0153673. PubMed ID: 27128736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Prediction of In-hospital Mortality in Emergency Department Patients With Sepsis: A Local Big Data-Driven, Machine Learning Approach.
Taylor RA; Pare JR; Venkatesh AK; Mowafi H; Melnick ER; Fleischman W; Hall MK
Acad Emerg Med; 2016 Mar; 23(3):269-78. PubMed ID: 26679719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Can We Train Machine Learning Methods to Outperform the High-dimensional Propensity Score Algorithm?
Karim ME; Pang M; Platt RW
Epidemiology; 2018 Mar; 29(2):191-198. PubMed ID: 29166301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Machine learning models in breast cancer survival prediction.
Montazeri M; Montazeri M; Montazeri M; Beigzadeh A
Technol Health Care; 2016; 24(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 26409558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
