132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29888044)
1. Biopsy Records Do Not Reduce Diagnosis Variability in Cancer Patient EHRs: Are We More Uncertain After Knowing?
Diaz-Garelli JF; Wells BJ; Yelton C; Strowd R; Topaloglu U
AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc; 2018; 2017():72-80. PubMed ID: 29888044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of diagnosis codes to identify side of colon in an electronic health record registry.
Luhn P; Kuk D; Carrigan G; Nussbaum N; Sorg R; Rohrer R; Tucker MG; Arnieri B; Taylor MD; Meropol NJ
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Aug; 19(1):177. PubMed ID: 31426736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Lost in Translation: Diagnosis Records Show More Inaccuracies After Biopsy in Oncology Care EHRs.
Diaz-Garelli JF; Strowd R; Wells BJ; Ahmed T; Merrill R; Topaloglu U
AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc; 2019; 2019():325-334. PubMed ID: 31258985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of an Algorithm for Identifying Ocular Conditions in Electronic Health Record Data.
Stein JD; Rahman M; Andrews C; Ehrlich JR; Kamat S; Shah M; Boese EA; Woodward MA; Cowall J; Trager EH; Narayanaswamy P; Hanauer DA
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2019 May; 137(5):491-497. PubMed ID: 30789656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing the Precision of ICD-10 Codes for Uveitis in 2 Electronic Health Record Systems.
Palestine AG; Merrill PT; Saleem SM; Jabs DA; Thorne JE
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2018 Oct; 136(10):1186-1190. PubMed ID: 30054618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Monitoring suicidal patients in primary care using electronic health records.
Anderson HD; Pace WD; Brandt E; Nielsen RD; Allen RR; Libby AM; West DR; Valuck RJ
J Am Board Fam Med; 2015; 28(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 25567824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. What evidence is there for a delay in diagnostic coding of RA in UK general practice records? An observational study of free text.
Ford E; Carroll J; Smith H; Davies K; Koeling R; Petersen I; Rait G; Cassell J
BMJ Open; 2016 Jun; 6(6):e010393. PubMed ID: 27354069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic accuracy of the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, codes of heart failure in an administrative database.
Bosco-Lévy P; Duret S; Picard F; Dos Santos P; Puymirat E; Gilleron V; Blin P; Chatellier G; Looten V; Moore N
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2019 Feb; 28(2):194-200. PubMed ID: 30395375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Using text mining to extract depressive symptoms and to validate the diagnosis of major depressive disorder from electronic health records.
Wu CS; Kuo CJ; Su CH; Wang SH; Dai HJ
J Affect Disord; 2020 Jan; 260():617-623. PubMed ID: 31541973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of Simulation Based on an Electronic Health Records Environment to Evaluate the Structure and Accuracy of Notes Generated by Medical Scribes: Proof-of-Concept Study.
Pranaat R; Mohan V; O'Reilly M; Hirsh M; McGrath K; Scholl G; Woodcock D; Gold JA
JMIR Med Inform; 2017 Sep; 5(3):e30. PubMed ID: 28931497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Early recognition of multiple sclerosis using natural language processing of the electronic health record.
Chase HS; Mitrani LR; Lu GG; Fulgieri DJ
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2017 Feb; 17(1):24. PubMed ID: 28241760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Definition, structure, content, use and impacts of electronic health records: a review of the research literature.
Häyrinen K; Saranto K; Nykänen P
Int J Med Inform; 2008 May; 77(5):291-304. PubMed ID: 17951106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Coding diagnoses and procedures using a high-quality clinical database instead of a medical record review.
van Walraven C; Demers SV
J Eval Clin Pract; 2001 Aug; 7(3):289-97. PubMed ID: 11555087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Documentation and coding of ED patient encounters: an evaluation of the accuracy of an electronic medical record.
Silfen E
Am J Emerg Med; 2006 Oct; 24(6):664-78. PubMed ID: 16984834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Electronic Health Records Data and Metadata: Challenges for Big Data in the United States.
Sweet LE; Moulaison HL
Big Data; 2013 Dec; 1(4):245-51. PubMed ID: 27447257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How the provenance of electronic health record data matters for research: a case example using system mapping.
Johnson KE; Kamineni A; Fuller S; Olmstead D; Wernli KJ
EGEMS (Wash DC); 2014; 2(1):1058. PubMed ID: 25821838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy and Completeness of Clinical Coding Using ICD-10 for Ambulatory Visits.
Horsky J; Drucker EA; Ramelson HZ
AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2017; 2017():912-920. PubMed ID: 29854158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Textual content, health problems and diagnostic codes in electronic patient records in general practice.
Nilsson G; Ahlfeldt H; Strender LE
Scand J Prim Health Care; 2003 Mar; 21(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 12718458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The influence of a specific ophthalmological electronic health record on ICD-10 coding.
Kortüm K; Hirneiß C; Müller M; Babenko A; Kampik A; Kreutzer TC
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2016 Jul; 16():100. PubMed ID: 27460682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An audit of the accuracy of upper gastrointestinal diagnoses in Scottish Morbidity Record 1 data in Tayside.
Dornan S; Murray FE; White G; McGilchrist MM; Evans JM; McDevitt DG; MacDonald TM
Health Bull (Edinb); 1995 Sep; 53(5):274-9. PubMed ID: 7490198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
