113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29888469)
1. Using machine learning to evaluate treatment effects in multiple-group interrupted time series analysis.
Linden A; Yarnold PR
J Eval Clin Pract; 2018 Aug; 24(4):740-744. PubMed ID: 29888469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Using randomization tests to assess treatment effects in multiple-group interrupted time series analysis.
Linden A
J Eval Clin Pract; 2019 Feb; 25(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 30003627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Using permutation tests to enhance causal inference in interrupted time series analysis.
Linden A
J Eval Clin Pract; 2018 Jun; 24(3):496-501. PubMed ID: 29460383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Combining synthetic controls and interrupted time series analysis to improve causal inference in program evaluation.
Linden A
J Eval Clin Pract; 2018 Apr; 24(2):447-453. PubMed ID: 29356225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A matching framework to improve causal inference in interrupted time-series analysis.
Linden A
J Eval Clin Pract; 2018 Apr; 24(2):408-415. PubMed ID: 29266646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Using forecast modelling to evaluate treatment effects in single-group interrupted time series analysis.
Linden A
J Eval Clin Pract; 2018 Aug; 24(4):695-700. PubMed ID: 29749091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Using machine learning to identify structural breaks in single-group interrupted time series designs.
Linden A; Yarnold PR
J Eval Clin Pract; 2016 Dec; 22(6):851-855. PubMed ID: 27091355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Using group-based trajectory modelling to enhance causal inference in interrupted time series analysis.
Linden A
J Eval Clin Pract; 2018 Jun; 24(3):502-507. PubMed ID: 29658192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Combining machine learning and matching techniques to improve causal inference in program evaluation.
Linden A; Yarnold PR
J Eval Clin Pract; 2016 Dec; 22(6):864-870. PubMed ID: 27353301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Challenges to validity in single-group interrupted time series analysis.
Linden A
J Eval Clin Pract; 2017 Apr; 23(2):413-418. PubMed ID: 27630090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Combining machine learning and propensity score weighting to estimate causal effects in multivalued treatments.
Linden A; Yarnold PR
J Eval Clin Pract; 2016 Dec; 22(6):871-881. PubMed ID: 27421786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Using machine learning to assess covariate balance in matching studies.
Linden A; Yarnold PR
J Eval Clin Pract; 2016 Dec; 22(6):844-850. PubMed ID: 27004916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Persistent threats to validity in single-group interrupted time series analysis with a cross over design.
Linden A
J Eval Clin Pract; 2017 Apr; 23(2):419-425. PubMed ID: 27804216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Applying a propensity score-based weighting model to interrupted time series data: improving causal inference in programme evaluation.
Linden A; Adams JL
J Eval Clin Pract; 2011 Dec; 17(6):1231-8. PubMed ID: 20973870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Methodological considerations for interrupted time series analysis in radiation epidemiology: an overview.
Wollschläger D; Auvinen A; Blettner M; Zeeb H
J Radiol Prot; 2021 Sep; 41(4):. PubMed ID: 34261051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Using machine learning to model dose-response relationships.
Linden A; Yarnold PR; Nallamothu BK
J Eval Clin Pract; 2016 Dec; 22(6):856-863. PubMed ID: 27240883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Using classification tree analysis to generate propensity score weights.
Linden A; Yarnold PR
J Eval Clin Pract; 2017 Aug; 23(4):703-712. PubMed ID: 28371206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interrupted time-series analysis: studying trends in neurosurgery.
Wong RH; Smieliauskas F; Pan IW; Lam SK
Neurosurg Focus; 2015 Dec; 39(6):E6. PubMed ID: 26621420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Design and analysis of two groups interrupt time series].
Li Y; Yu SC; Jin CG; Yang MJ; Ma XJ; Wang QQ
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Sep; 40(9):1159-1163. PubMed ID: 31594165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Enhancing predictive accuracy and reproducibility in clinical evaluation research: Commentary on the special section of the Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice.
Bryant FB
J Eval Clin Pract; 2016 Dec; 22(6):829-834. PubMed ID: 27870286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
