250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29888474)
1. Characterization and comparison of cold brew and cold drip coffee extraction methods.
Angeloni G; Guerrini L; Masella P; Innocenti M; Bellumori M; Parenti A
J Sci Food Agric; 2019 Jan; 99(1):391-399. PubMed ID: 29888474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of brew strength, brew yield, and roast on the sensory quality of drip brewed coffee.
Frost SC; Ristenpart WD; Guinard JX
J Food Sci; 2020 Aug; 85(8):2530-2543. PubMed ID: 32652586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of Basket Geometry on the Sensory Quality and Consumer Acceptance of Drip Brewed Coffee.
Frost SC; Ristenpart WD; Guinard JX
J Food Sci; 2019 Aug; 84(8):2297-2312. PubMed ID: 31269246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of coffee brewing methods on the chromatographic and spectroscopic profiles, antioxidant and sensory properties.
Stanek N; Zarębska M; Biłos Ł; Barabosz K; Nowakowska-Bogdan E; Semeniuk I; Błaszkiewicz J; Kulesza R; Matejuk R; Szkutnik K
Sci Rep; 2021 Nov; 11(1):21377. PubMed ID: 34725433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of grinding, extraction time and type of coffee on the physicochemical and flavour characteristics of cold brew coffee.
Cordoba N; Pataquiva L; Osorio C; Moreno FLM; Ruiz RY
Sci Rep; 2019 Jun; 9(1):8440. PubMed ID: 31186459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sensory and monosaccharide analysis of drip brew coffee fractions versus brewing time.
Batali ME; Frost SC; Lebrilla CB; Ristenpart WD; Guinard JX
J Sci Food Agric; 2020 May; 100(7):2953-2962. PubMed ID: 32031262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Process characterization and optimization of cold brew coffee: effect of pressure, temperature, time and solvent volume on yield, caffeine and phenol content.
Kyroglou S; Thanasouli K; Vareltzis P
J Sci Food Agric; 2021 Aug; 101(11):4789-4798. PubMed ID: 33527437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Chemical and sensory evaluation of cold brew coffees using different roasting profiles and brewing methods.
Córdoba N; Moreno FL; Osorio C; Velásquez S; Ruiz Y
Food Res Int; 2021 Mar; 141():110141. PubMed ID: 33642008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. What kind of coffee do you drink? An investigation on effects of eight different extraction methods.
Angeloni G; Guerrini L; Masella P; Bellumori M; Daluiso S; Parenti A; Innocenti M
Food Res Int; 2019 Feb; 116():1327-1335. PubMed ID: 30716922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How grinding level and brewing method (Espresso, American, Turkish) could affect the antioxidant activity and bioactive compounds in a coffee cup.
Derossi A; Ricci I; Caporizzi R; Fiore A; Severini C
J Sci Food Agric; 2018 Jun; 98(8):3198-3207. PubMed ID: 29230816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bioactive profile and microbiological safety of Coffea arabica and Coffea canephora beverages obtained by innovative cold extraction methods (cold brews).
Cerca NF; DePaula J; Calado VMA; Antônio L Miguel M; Farah A
Food Res Int; 2023 Dec; 174(Pt 2):113667. PubMed ID: 37981379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimization of Sensory Properties of Cold Brew Coffee Produced by Reduced Pressure Cycles and Its Physicochemical Characteristics.
Kyroglou S; Laskari R; Vareltzis P
Molecules; 2022 May; 27(9):. PubMed ID: 35566326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Brazilian Coffee Blends: A Simple and Fast Method by Near-Infrared Spectroscopy for the Determination of the Sensory Attributes Elicited in Professional Coffee Cupping.
Baqueta MR; Coqueiro A; Valderrama P
J Food Sci; 2019 Jun; 84(6):1247-1255. PubMed ID: 31116425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of brewing conditions and coffee species on the physicochemical characteristics, preference and dynamics of sensory attributes perception in cold brews.
Portela CDS; Almeida IF; Reis TADD; Hickmann BRB; Benassi MT
Food Res Int; 2022 Jan; 151():110860. PubMed ID: 34980396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of three post-harvest methods and roasting degree on sensory profile of Turkish coffee assessed by Turkish and Brazilian panelists.
Elmacı İ; Gok I
J Sci Food Agric; 2021 Oct; 101(13):5368-5377. PubMed ID: 33650176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The influence of different types of preparation (espresso and brew) on coffee aroma and main bioactive constituents.
Caprioli G; Cortese M; Sagratini G; Vittori S
Int J Food Sci Nutr; 2015; 66(5):505-13. PubMed ID: 26171629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Identification of Compounds that Negatively Impact Coffee Flavor Quality Using Untargeted Liquid Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry Analysis.
Sittipod S; Schwartz E; Paravisini L; Tello E; Peterson DG
J Agric Food Chem; 2020 Sep; 68(38):10424-10431. PubMed ID: 32172556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mozambioside Is an Arabica-Specific Bitter-Tasting Furokaurane Glucoside in Coffee Beans.
Lang R; Klade S; Beusch A; Dunkel A; Hofmann T
J Agric Food Chem; 2015 Dec; 63(48):10492-9. PubMed ID: 26585544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bioactive composition and antioxidant potential of different commonly consumed coffee brews affected by their preparation technique and milk addition.
Niseteo T; Komes D; Belščak-Cvitanović A; Horžić D; Budeč M
Food Chem; 2012 Oct; 134(4):1870-7. PubMed ID: 23442632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of processing on chlorogenic acid content of commercially available coffee.
Mills CE; Oruna-Concha MJ; Mottram DS; Gibson GR; Spencer JP
Food Chem; 2013 Dec; 141(4):3335-40. PubMed ID: 23993490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
