These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29888641)

  • 21. Readability of websites containing information on dental implants.
    Jayaratne YS; Anderson NK; Zwahlen RA
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Dec; 25(12):1319-24. PubMed ID: 24148074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Breast reconstruction post mastectomy- Let's Google it. Accessibility, readability and quality of online information.
    Lynch NP; Lang B; Angelov S; McGarrigle SA; Boyle TJ; Al-Azawi D; Connolly EM
    Breast; 2017 Apr; 32():126-129. PubMed ID: 28178606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Readability of online information about HPV Immunization.
    MacLean SA; Basch CH; Ethan D; Garcia P
    Hum Vaccin Immunother; 2019; 15(7-8):1505-1507. PubMed ID: 30024828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The readability of general practice websites: a cross-sectional analysis of all general practice websites in Scotland.
    Rughani G; Hanlon P; Corcoran N; Mair FS
    Br J Gen Pract; 2021 May; 71(706):e391-e398. PubMed ID: 33824159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Readability of consumer health information on the internet: a comparison of U.S. government-funded and commercially funded websites.
    Risoldi Cochrane Z; Gregory P; Wilson A
    J Health Commun; 2012; 17(9):1003-10. PubMed ID: 22512714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Readability of websites containing information about prostate cancer treatment options.
    Ellimoottil C; Polcari A; Kadlec A; Gupta G
    J Urol; 2012 Dec; 188(6):2171-5. PubMed ID: 23083852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluating the quality and readability of Internet information sources regarding the treatment of swallowing disorders.
    O'Connell Ferster AP; Hu A
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2017 Mar; 96(3):128-138. PubMed ID: 28346643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Online Patient Resources for Liposuction: A Comparative Analysis of Readability.
    Vargas CR; Ricci JA; Chuang DJ; Lee BT
    Ann Plast Surg; 2016 Mar; 76(3):349-54. PubMed ID: 25695442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Readability of Online Information Related to Pediatric Radiation Safety From Societal Websites.
    Yi PH; Yi MM; Nguyen JC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Nov; 211(5):1128-1134. PubMed ID: 30240293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Readability of online patient-based information on bariatric surgery.
    Meleo-Erwin Z; Basch C; Fera J; Ethan D; Garcia P
    Health Promot Perspect; 2019; 9(2):156-160. PubMed ID: 31249804
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Systematic analysis of the readability of patient information on the websites of clinics for plastic surgery].
    Esfahani BJ; Faron A; Roth KS; Schaller HE; Medved F; Lüers JC
    Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir; 2014 Dec; 46(6):369-74. PubMed ID: 25412241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Quality and readability of English-language internet information for aphasia.
    Azios JH; Bellon-Harn M; Dockens AL; Manchaiah V
    Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2019 Feb; 21(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 28805470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Health literacy and the Internet: a study on the readability of Australian online health information.
    Cheng C; Dunn M
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2015 Aug; 39(4):309-14. PubMed ID: 25716142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The Readability of Online Resources for Mastopexy Surgery.
    Vargas CR; Chuang DJ; Lee BT
    Ann Plast Surg; 2016 Jan; 77(1):110-4. PubMed ID: 25536208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assessing the quality, reliability and readability of online health information regarding systemic lupus erythematosus.
    Reynolds M; Hoi A; Buchanan RRC
    Lupus; 2018 Oct; 27(12):1911-1917. PubMed ID: 30114969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Analyzing the Readability of Online Urogynecologic Patient Information.
    Stewart JR; Heit MH; Meriwether KV; Hobson DT; Francis SL
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019; 25(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 29117016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Uterine Artery Embolization: An Analysis of Online Patient Information Quality and Readability with Historical Comparison.
    Murray TE; Mansoor T; Bowden DJ; O'Neill DC; Lee MJ
    Acad Radiol; 2018 May; 25(5):619-625. PubMed ID: 29331361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The readability of psychosocial wellness patient resources: improving surgical outcomes.
    Kugar MA; Cohen AC; Wooden W; Tholpady SS; Chu MW
    J Surg Res; 2017 Oct; 218():43-48. PubMed ID: 28985876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Quality and readability of online information resources on insomnia.
    Ma Y; Yang AC; Duan Y; Dong M; Yeung AS
    Front Med; 2017 Sep; 11(3):423-431. PubMed ID: 28500432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Examining the Reading Level of Internet Medical Information for Common Internal Medicine Diagnoses.
    Hutchinson N; Baird GL; Garg M
    Am J Med; 2016 Jun; 129(6):637-9. PubMed ID: 26829438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.