These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

292 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29888641)

  • 41. Examining the Reading Level of Internet Medical Information for Common Internal Medicine Diagnoses.
    Hutchinson N; Baird GL; Garg M
    Am J Med; 2016 Jun; 129(6):637-9. PubMed ID: 26829438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Readability assessment of internet-based consumer health information.
    Walsh TM; Volsko TA
    Respir Care; 2008 Oct; 53(10):1310-5. PubMed ID: 18811992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Readability evaluation of Internet-based patient education materials related to the anesthesiology field.
    De Oliveira GS; Jung M; Mccaffery KJ; McCarthy RJ; Wolf MS
    J Clin Anesth; 2015 Aug; 27(5):401-5. PubMed ID: 25912728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Readability and quality assessment of internet-based patient education materials related to laryngeal cancer.
    Narwani V; Nalamada K; Lee M; Kothari P; Lakhani R
    Head Neck; 2016 Apr; 38(4):601-5. PubMed ID: 25491544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The readability and reliability of online information about adenoidectomy.
    Ahmadi O; Wood AJ
    J Laryngol Otol; 2021 Nov; 135(11):976-980. PubMed ID: 34392845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Assessment of readability, quality and popularity of online information on ureteral stents.
    Mozafarpour S; Norris B; Borin J; Eisner BH
    World J Urol; 2018 Jun; 36(6):985-992. PubMed ID: 29435639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Online Patient Resources for Gender Affirmation Surgery: An Analysis of Readability.
    Kiwanuka E; Mehrzad R; Prsic A; Kwan D
    Ann Plast Surg; 2017 Oct; 79(4):329-333. PubMed ID: 28858881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Testicular Cancer on the Web-an Appropriate Source of Patient Information in Concordance with the European Association of Urology Guidelines?
    Paffenholz P; Salem J; Borgmann H; Nestler T; Pfister D; Ruf C; Tsaur I; Haferkamp A; Heidenreich A
    J Cancer Educ; 2018 Dec; 33(6):1314-1322. PubMed ID: 28776306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.
    Huang G; Fang CH; Agarwal N; Bhagat N; Eloy JA; Langer PD
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Apr; 133(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 25654639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Tinnitus information online - does it ring true?
    McKearney RM; MacKinnon RC; Smith M; Baker R
    J Laryngol Otol; 2018 Nov; 132(11):984-989. PubMed ID: 30353795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. How evidence-based is the information on the internet about nausea and vomiting of pregnancy?
    Sacks S; Abenhaim HA
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2013 Aug; 35(8):697-703. PubMed ID: 24007704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Readability Analysis of Online Headache and Migraine Information.
    Russo A; Lavorgna L; Silvestro M; Abbadessa G; Bisecco A; Trojsi F; Tessitore A; Tedeschi G; Bonavita S
    Headache; 2020 Jul; 60(7):1317-1324. PubMed ID: 32463516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Information about oral cancer on the Internet: our patients cannot understand it.
    Varela-Centelles P; Ledesma-Ludi Y; Seoane-Romero JM; Seoane J
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Apr; 53(4):393-5. PubMed ID: 25703184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Information regarding Zika virus on the Internet: A cross-sectional study of readability.
    Basch CH; Fera J; Garcia Bs P
    Am J Infect Control; 2020 Jun; 48(6):714-715. PubMed ID: 31862166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Readability Assessment of Online Patient Abdominoplasty Resources.
    Phillips NA; Vargas CR; Chuang DJ; Lee BT
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2015 Feb; 39(1):147-53. PubMed ID: 25476602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Readability and quality assessment of websites related to microtia and aural atresia.
    Alamoudi U; Hong P
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Feb; 79(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 25554575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Readability assessment of online ophthalmic patient information.
    Edmunds MR; Barry RJ; Denniston AK
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2013 Dec; 131(12):1610-6. PubMed ID: 24178035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Accessibility of online self-management support websites for people with osteoarthritis: A text content analysis.
    Chapman L; Brooks C; Lawson J; Russell C; Adams J
    Chronic Illn; 2019 Mar; 15(1):27-40. PubMed ID: 29254372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Evaluating breast cancer websites targeting Arabic speakers: empirical investigation of popularity, availability, accessibility, readability, and quality.
    Jasem Z; AlMeraj Z; Alhuwail D
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2022 May; 22(1):126. PubMed ID: 35534816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Literacy Analysis of Spanish Online Resources for Breast Reconstruction.
    Doval AF; Riba L; Tran BNN; Rudd R; Lee BT
    Ann Plast Surg; 2018 Apr; 80(4 Suppl 4):S189-S195. PubMed ID: 29538001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.