These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29888692)

  • 1. The effect of cochlear implant bed preparation and fixation technique on the revision cochlear implantation rate.
    Pamuk AE; Pamuk G; Jafarov S; Bajin MD; Saraç S; Sennaroğlu L
    J Laryngol Otol; 2018 Jun; 132(6):534-539. PubMed ID: 29888692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cochlear implant fixation using a subperiosteal tight pocket without either suture or bone-recess technique.
    Jethanamest D; Channer GA; Moss WJ; Lustig LR; Telischi FF
    Laryngoscope; 2014 Jul; 124(7):1674-7. PubMed ID: 24114870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tailed Palva flap in the subperiosteal pocket technique for cochlear implantation.
    Orhan KS; Polat B; Enver N; Güldiken Y
    J Laryngol Otol; 2015 Sep; 129(9):916-8. PubMed ID: 26314323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. 228 cases of cochlear implant receiver-stimulator placement in a tight subperiosteal pocket without fixation.
    Sweeney AD; Carlson ML; Valenzuela CV; Wanna GB; Rivas A; Bennett ML; Haynes DS
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Apr; 152(4):712-7. PubMed ID: 25605691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spontaneous bone bed formation in cochlear implantation using the subperiosteal pocket technique.
    Orhan KS; Polat B; Enver N; Çelik M; Güldiken Y; Değer K
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Dec; 35(10):1752-4. PubMed ID: 25025535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The temporalis pocket technique for cochlear implantation: an anatomic and clinical study.
    Balkany TJ; Whitley M; Shapira Y; Angeli SI; Brown K; Eter E; Van De Water T; Telischi FF; Eshraghi AA; Treaba C
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Oct; 30(7):903-7. PubMed ID: 19730145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Subperiosteal temporal pocket versus standard technique in cochlear implantation: a comparative clinical study.
    Güldiken Y; Orhan KS; Yiğit O; Başaran B; Polat B; Güneş S; Acoğlu E; Değer K
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Aug; 32(6):987-91. PubMed ID: 21725262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A simplified fixation of the new thin cochlear implant receiver-stimulators in children: long term results with the "back-pocket" technique.
    Cuda D
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Jul; 77(7):1158-61. PubMed ID: 23707154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cochlear implant failure, revision, and reimplantation.
    Sunde J; Webb JB; Moore PC; Gluth MB; Dornhoffer JL
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Dec; 34(9):1670-4. PubMed ID: 24232064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimal access cochlear implant fixation: temporalis pocket with a plate.
    Shelton C; Warren FM
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Dec; 33(9):1530-4. PubMed ID: 23064385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Incidence and indications for revision cochlear implant surgery in adults and children.
    Brown KD; Connell SS; Balkany TJ; Eshraghi AE; Telischi FF; Angeli SA
    Laryngoscope; 2009 Jan; 119(1):152-7. PubMed ID: 19117299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of receiver-stimulator migration in cochlear implantation using the subperiosteal pocket technique: a prospective clinical study.
    Güldiken Y; Polat B; Enver N; Aydemir L; Çomoğlu Ş; Orhan KS
    J Laryngol Otol; 2017 Jun; 131(6):487-491. PubMed ID: 28290917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Device fixation in cochlear implantation: is bone anchoring necessary?
    Molony TB; Giles JE; Thompson TL; ; Motamedi KK
    Laryngoscope; 2010 Sep; 120(9):1837-9. PubMed ID: 20602458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cochlear implant fixation in children using periosteal sutures.
    Adunka OF; Buchman CA
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Sep; 28(6):768-70. PubMed ID: 17577130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A monocenter, patient-blinded, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority study to compare cochlear implant receiver/stimulator device fixation techniques (COMFIT) with and without drilling in adults eligible for primary cochlear implantation.
    Markodimitraki LM; Harkel TCT; Bennink E; Stegeman I; Thomeer HGXM
    Trials; 2023 Sep; 24(1):605. PubMed ID: 37743463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Failure rate in pediatric cochlear implantation and hearing results following revision surgery.
    Gardner PA; Shanley R; Perry BP
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Aug; 111():13-15. PubMed ID: 29958596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating Reasons for Revision Surgery and Device Failure Rates in Patients Who Underwent Cochlear Implantation Surgery.
    Kim SY; Kim MB; Chung WH; Cho YS; Hong SH; Moon IJ
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2020 May; 146(5):414-420. PubMed ID: 32134441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Radiologic Evidence of Cochlear Implant Bone Bed Formation Following the Subperiosteal Temporal Pocket Technique.
    Turanoglu AK; Yigit O; Acioglu E; Okbay AM
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2016 Apr; 154(4):702-6. PubMed ID: 26884370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Non-sutured fixation of the internal receiver-stimulator in cochlear implantation.
    Boscolo-Rizzo P; Muzzi E; Barillari MR; Trabalzini F
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2011 Jul; 268(7):961-5. PubMed ID: 21221619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multicenter evaluation of the digisonic SP cochlear implant fixation system with titanium screws in 156 patients.
    Guevara N; Sterkers O; Bébéar JP; Meller R; Magnan J; Mosnier I; Amstutz I; Lerosey Y; Triglia JM; Roman S; Gahide I
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2010 Aug; 119(8):501-5. PubMed ID: 20860274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.