269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29888730)
1. Evaluation of fracture resistance in root canal-treated teeth restored using different techniques.
Aslan T; Sagsen B; Er Ö; Ustun Y; Cinar F
Niger J Clin Pract; 2018 Jun; 21(6):795-800. PubMed ID: 29888730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of different restoration techniques on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated molars.
Cobankara FK; Unlu N; Cetin AR; Ozkan HB
Oper Dent; 2008; 33(5):526-33. PubMed ID: 18833859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fracture resistance of root filled molar teeth restored with glass fibre bundles.
Rodrigues FB; Paranhos MP; Spohr AM; Oshima HM; Carlini B; Burnett LH
Int Endod J; 2010 May; 43(5):356-62. PubMed ID: 20518927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth, with variable marginal ridge thicknesses, restored with composite resin and composite resin reinforced with Ribbond: an in vitro study.
Kalburge V; Yakub SS; Kalburge J; Hiremath H; Chandurkar A
Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 23965445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fracture resistance and stress distribution in endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with composite resin.
Soares PV; Santos-Filho PCF; Queiroz EC; Araújo TC; Campos RE; Araújo CA; Soares CJ
J Prosthodont; 2008 Feb; 17(2):114-119. PubMed ID: 17971112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fracture resistance of root filled premolar teeth restored with direct composite resin with or without cusp coverage.
Xie KX; Wang XY; Gao XJ; Yuan CY; Li JX; Chu CH
Int Endod J; 2012 Jun; 45(6):524-9. PubMed ID: 22242600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of the post length and cusp coverage on the cycling and static load of endodontically treated maxillary premolars.
Scotti N; Scansetti M; Rota R; Pera F; Pasqualini D; Berutti E
Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Dec; 15(6):923-9. PubMed ID: 20830497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of fiber post and cusp coverage on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars directly restored with composite resin.
Mohammadi N; Kahnamoii MA; Yeganeh PK; Navimipour EJ
J Endod; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1428-32. PubMed ID: 19801245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reinforcement effect of polyethylene fibre in root-filled teeth: comparison of two restoration techniques.
Belli S; Erdemir A; Yildirim C
Int Endod J; 2006 Feb; 39(2):136-42. PubMed ID: 16454794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays.
Hannig C; Westphal C; Becker K; Attin T
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 16198171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fracture strength and fracture patterns of root filled teeth restored with direct resin restorations.
Taha NA; Palamara JE; Messer HH
J Dent; 2011 Aug; 39(8):527-35. PubMed ID: 21620926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of resin-based materials on fracture resistance of endodontically treated thin-walled teeth.
Balkaya MC; Birdal IS
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):296-303. PubMed ID: 23684279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Premolars Restored With Different Methods.
Mergulhão VA; de Mendonça LS; de Albuquerque MS; Braz R
Oper Dent; 2019; 44(1):E1-E11. PubMed ID: 30715998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with composite posts.
Newman MP; Yaman P; Dennison J; Rafter M; Billy E
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Apr; 89(4):360-7. PubMed ID: 12690348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of bulk-fill base material on fracture strength of root-filled teeth restored with laminate resin composite restorations.
Taha NA; Maghaireh GA; Ghannam AS; Palamara JE
J Dent; 2017 Aug; 63():60-64. PubMed ID: 28571830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of post-retained composite restoration of MOD preparations on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth.
Sorrentino R; Salameh Z; Zarone F; Tay FR; Ferrari M
J Adhes Dent; 2007 Feb; 9(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 17432401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of two types of composite fibers on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars: an in vitro study.
Oskoee PA; Chaharom ME; Kimyai S; Oskoee JS; Varasteh S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Jan; 12(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 22186687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of adhesive techniques on fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars with various residual wall thicknesses.
Scotti N; Rota R; Scansetti M; Paolino DS; Chiandussi G; Pasqualini D; Berutti E
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):376-82. PubMed ID: 24095213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of fiber-reinforced direct restorative materials on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated mandibular molars restored with a conservative endodontic cavity design.
Nezir M; Dinçtürk BA; Sarı C; Alp CK; Altınışık H
Clin Oral Investig; 2024 May; 28(6):316. PubMed ID: 38750289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of two different types of fibers on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated molars restored with composite resin.
Khan SI; Anupama R; Deepalakshmi M; Kumar KS
J Adhes Dent; 2013 Apr; 15(2):167-71. PubMed ID: 23534017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
