These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29889979)

  • 1. Measuring the Rarity of Fingerprint Patterns in the Dutch Population Using an Extended Classification Set.
    de Jongh A; Lubach AR; Lie Kwie SL; Alberink I
    J Forensic Sci; 2019 Jan; 64(1):108-119. PubMed ID: 29889979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measuring the rarity of core-delta distances in fingerprint patterns in the Dutch population.
    de Jongh A; Lubach AR; Lie Kwie SL; Loadsman-Wammes FDLV; Alberink I
    J Forensic Sci; 2024 Jan; 69(1):94-116. PubMed ID: 37723644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing the frequency of general fingerprint patterns by fingerprint examiners and novices.
    Mattijssen EJAT; Witteman CLM; Berger CEH; Stoel RD
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Aug; 313():110347. PubMed ID: 32512413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Unusual fingerprint patterns in humans: implications for forensic casework and fingerprint research.
    Baryah N; Krishan K; Kanchan T
    Naturwissenschaften; 2023 Feb; 110(1):5. PubMed ID: 36723673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Frequency and correlation of lip prints, fingerprints and ABO blood groups in population of Sriganganagar District, Rajasthan.
    Sandhu H; Verma P; Padda S; Raj SS
    Acta Med Acad; 2017 Nov; 46(2):105-115. PubMed ID: 29338274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Experimental results of fingerprint comparison validity and reliability: A review and critical analysis.
    Haber RN; Haber L
    Sci Justice; 2014 Sep; 54(5):375-389. PubMed ID: 25278202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modern statistical models for forensic fingerprint examinations: a critical review.
    Abraham J; Champod C; Lennard C; Roux C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Oct; 232(1-3):131-50. PubMed ID: 24053874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Resolving latent conflict: What happens when latent print examiners enter the cage?
    Rairden A; Garrett BL; Kelley S; Murrie D; Castillo A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Aug; 289():215-222. PubMed ID: 29933202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy and reliability of forensic latent fingerprint decisions.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Buscaglia J; Roberts MA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 May; 108(19):7733-8. PubMed ID: 21518906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparing Categorical and Probabilistic Fingerprint Evidence.
    Garrett B; Mitchell G; Scurich N
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 Nov; 63(6):1712-1717. PubMed ID: 29684944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fingermark evidence evaluation based on automated fingerprint identification system matching scores: the effect of different types of conditioning on likelihood ratios.
    Alberink I; de Jongh A; Rodriguez C
    J Forensic Sci; 2014 Jan; 59(1):70-81. PubMed ID: 24180303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance Study of a Score-based Likelihood Ratio System for Forensic Fingermark Comparison.
    Leegwater AJ; Meuwly D; Sjerps M; Vergeer P; Alberink I
    J Forensic Sci; 2017 May; 62(3):626-640. PubMed ID: 28168685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantitative assessment of evidential weight for a fingerprint comparison. Part II: a generalisation to take account of the general pattern.
    Neumann C; Evett IW; Skerrett JE; Mateos-Garcia I
    Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Jan; 214(1-3):195-9. PubMed ID: 21885220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantifying the weight of fingerprint evidence through the spatial relationship, directions and types of minutiae observed on fingermarks.
    Neumann C; Champod C; Yoo M; Genessay T; Langenburg G
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Mar; 248():154-71. PubMed ID: 25637956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of cognitive bias, examiner expertise, and stimulus material on forensic evidence analysis.
    Pena MM; Stoiloff S; Sparacino M; Schreiber Compo N
    J Forensic Sci; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38922874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Longitudinal study of fingerprint recognition.
    Yoon S; Jain AK
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Jul; 112(28):8555-60. PubMed ID: 26124106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gaze behavior and cognitive states during fingerprint target group localization.
    Hicklin RA; Ulery BT; Busey TA; Roberts MA; Buscaglia J
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2019 Apr; 4(1):12. PubMed ID: 30953242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Finding the perfect match: Fingerprint expertise facilitates statistical learning and visual comparison decision-making.
    Growns B; Mattijssen EJAT; Salerno JM; Schweitzer NJ; Cole SA; Martire KA
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2023 Jun; 29(2):386-397. PubMed ID: 35404639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spatial analysis of corresponding fingerprint features from match and close non-match populations.
    Abraham J; Champod C; Lennard C; Roux C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Jul; 230(1-3):87-98. PubMed ID: 23153799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Measuring what latent fingerprint examiners consider sufficient information for individualization determinations.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Roberts MA; Buscaglia J
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e110179. PubMed ID: 25372036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.