These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. The impact of human-technology cooperation and distributed cognition in forensic science: biasing effects of AFIS contextual information on human experts. Dror IE; Wertheim K; Fraser-Mackenzie P; Walajtys J J Forensic Sci; 2012 Mar; 57(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 22212067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Data on the interexaminer variation of minutia markup on latent fingerprints. Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Roberts MA; Buscaglia J Data Brief; 2016 Sep; 8():158-90. PubMed ID: 27294185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Holistic processing of fingerprints by expert forensic examiners. Vogelsang MD; Palmeri TJ; Busey TA Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2017; 2(1):15. PubMed ID: 28275708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Probabilistic Fingermark Quality Assessment with Quality Region Localisation. Oblak T; Haraksim R; Beslay L; Peer P Sensors (Basel); 2023 Apr; 23(8):. PubMed ID: 37112346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The influence of Close Non-Match fingerprints similar in delta regions of whorls on fingerprint identification. Li K; Wu D; Ai L; Luo Y J Forensic Sci; 2021 Jul; 66(4):1482-1494. PubMed ID: 33634870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Fingerprint pattern restoration by digital image processing techniques. Wen CY; Yu CC J Forensic Sci; 2003 Sep; 48(5):973-84. PubMed ID: 14535661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Computation of likelihood ratios in fingerprint identification for configurations of three minutiae. Neumann C; Champod C; Puch-Solis R; Egli N; Anthonioz A; Meuwly D; Bromage-Griffiths A J Forensic Sci; 2006 Nov; 51(6):1255-66. PubMed ID: 17199611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Recent progress on fingerprint visualization and analysis by imaging ridge residue components. Su B Anal Bioanal Chem; 2016 Apr; 408(11):2781-91. PubMed ID: 26781104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Performance evaluation of automated fingerprint identification systems for specific conditions observed in casework using simulated fingermarks. de Jongh A; Rodriguez CM J Forensic Sci; 2012 Jul; 57(4):1075-81. PubMed ID: 22458701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Matching Contactless and Contact-based Conventional Fingerprint Images for Biometrics Identification. Lin C; Kumar A IEEE Trans Image Process; 2018 Apr; 27(4):2008-2021. PubMed ID: 29990285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Why do latent fingerprint examiners differ in their conclusions? Hicklin RA; Ulery BT; Ausdemore M; Buscaglia J Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Nov; 316():110542. PubMed ID: 33147525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Discrepancies in expert decision-making in forensic fingerprint examination. Mustonen V; Hakkarainen K; Tuunainen J; Pohjola P Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Sep; 254():215-26. PubMed ID: 26254629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Accuracy and reliability of feature selection by Chinese fingerprint examiners. Liu S; Mi Z; Langenburg GM; Wu J Forensic Sci Res; 2017; 2(4):203-209. PubMed ID: 30483643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The quantification of fingerprint quality using a relative contrast index. Humphreys JD; Porter G; Bell M Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Jun; 178(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 18359590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Ridge Width Correlations between Inked Prints and Powdered Latent Fingerprints. De Alcaraz-Fossoul J; Barrot-Feixat C; Zapico SC; Mancenido M; Broatch J; Roberts KA; Carreras-Marin C; Tasker J J Forensic Sci; 2018 Jul; 63(4):1085-1091. PubMed ID: 28973828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Fingermark submission decision-making within a UK fingerprint laboratory: Do experts get the marks that they need? Earwaker H; Morgan RM; Harris AJ; Hall LJ Sci Justice; 2015 Jul; 55(4):239-47. PubMed ID: 26087871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]