239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29890011)
1. The Extraction and Recovery Efficiency of Pure DNA for Different Types of Swabs.
Bruijns BB; Tiggelaar RM; Gardeniers H
J Forensic Sci; 2018 Sep; 63(5):1492-1499. PubMed ID: 29890011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Swabs as DNA collection devices for sampling different biological materials from different substrates.
Verdon TJ; Mitchell RJ; van Oorschot RA
J Forensic Sci; 2014 Jul; 59(4):1080-9. PubMed ID: 24502761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of DNA collection and retrieval from two swab types (cotton and nylon flocked swab) when processed using three QIAGEN extraction methods.
Brownlow RJ; Dagnall KE; Ames CE
J Forensic Sci; 2012 May; 57(3):713-7. PubMed ID: 22211626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Visualising latent DNA on swabs.
Kanokwongnuwut P; Kirkbride P; Linacre A
Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Oct; 291():115-123. PubMed ID: 30195152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Advantage of ForensiX Swabs in Retrieving and Preserving Biological Fluids.
Mawlood SK; Alrowaithi M; Watson N
J Forensic Sci; 2015 May; 60(3):686-9. PubMed ID: 25684353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of methods to improve the extraction and recovery of DNA from cotton swabs for forensic analysis.
Adamowicz MS; Stasulli DM; Sobestanovich EM; Bille TW
PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e116351. PubMed ID: 25549111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Enhanced forensic DNA recovery with appropriate swabs and optimized swabbing technique.
Hedman J; Akel Y; Jansson L; Hedell R; Wallmark N; Forsberg C; Ansell R
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Jul; 53():102491. PubMed ID: 33774569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Screening for cytomegalovirus shedding in vagina and saliva: Significant differences between biological fluids, swab types and storage durations in DNA recovery.
Tan NK; Pope CF; Carrington D
J Clin Virol; 2022 Jan; 146():105055. PubMed ID: 34953320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Post-coital vaginal sampling with nylon flocked swabs improves DNA typing.
Benschop CC; Wiebosch DC; Kloosterman AD; Sijen T
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2010 Feb; 4(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 20129470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of NucleoSpin® Forensic Filters on DNA recovery from trace DNA swabs.
Heathfield LJ; Hitewa AN; Gibbon A; Mole CG
Sci Justice; 2022 May; 62(3):284-287. PubMed ID: 35598922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Direct PCR amplification of DNA from human bloodstains, saliva, and touch samples collected with microFLOQ
Ambers A; Wiley R; Novroski N; Budowle B
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Jan; 32():80-87. PubMed ID: 29126000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Perfect Match: Assessment of Sample Collection Efficiency for Immunological and Molecular Findings in Different Types of Fabrics.
C Zapico S; Dytso A; Rubio L; Roca G
Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Sep; 23(18):. PubMed ID: 36142599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Collaborative swab performance comparison and the impact of sampling solution volumes on DNA recovery.
Seiberle I; Währer J; Kron S; Flury K; Girardin M; Schocker A; Schulz I
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Jul; 59():102716. PubMed ID: 35512614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. New technique to take samples from environmental surfaces using flocked nylon swabs.
Hedin G; Rynbäck J; Loré B
J Hosp Infect; 2010 Aug; 75(4):314-7. PubMed ID: 20451296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optimization of DNA extraction and sampling methods for successful forensic microbiome analyses of the skin and saliva.
Yu KM; Lee AM; Cho HS; Lee JW; Lim SK
Int J Legal Med; 2023 Jan; 137(1):63-77. PubMed ID: 36416962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Touch DNA collection - Performance of four different swabs.
Comte J; Baechler S; Gervaix J; Lock E; Milon MP; Delémont O; Castella V
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Nov; 43():102113. PubMed ID: 31525724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Nondestructive Biological Evidence Collection with Alternative Swabs and Adhesive Lifters.
Plaza DT; Mealy JL; Lane JN; Parsons MN; Bathrick AS; Slack DP
J Forensic Sci; 2016 Mar; 61(2):485-488. PubMed ID: 27404622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Swab materials and Bacillus anthracis spore recovery from nonporous surfaces.
Rose L; Jensen B; Peterson A; Banerjee SN; Srduino MJ
Emerg Infect Dis; 2004 Jun; 10(6):1023-9. PubMed ID: 15207053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development of a normalized extraction to further aid in fast, high-throughput processing of forensic DNA reference samples.
Connon CC; LeFebvre AK; Benjamin RC
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Nov; 25():112-124. PubMed ID: 27566134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Qualification of high-recovery, flocked swabs as compared to traditional rayon swabs for microbiological environmental monitoring of surfaces.
Dalmaso G; Bini M; Paroni R; Ferrari M
PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2008; 62(3):191-9. PubMed ID: 18661868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
