BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29890011)

  • 21. Qualification of high-recovery, flocked swabs as compared to traditional rayon swabs for microbiological environmental monitoring of surfaces.
    Dalmaso G; Bini M; Paroni R; Ferrari M
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2008; 62(3):191-9. PubMed ID: 18661868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of the efficiency of Isohelix™ and Rayon swabs for recovery of DNA from metal surfaces.
    Bonsu DOM; Higgins D; Henry J; Austin JJ
    Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2021 Jun; 17(2):199-207. PubMed ID: 33180274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of swab types for collection and analysis of microorganisms.
    Wise NM; Wagner SJ; Worst TJ; Sprague JE; Oechsle CM
    Microbiologyopen; 2021 Nov; 10(6):e1244. PubMed ID: 34964289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of a novel material, Diomics X-Swab™, for collection of DNA.
    Marshall PL; Stoljarova M; Larue BL; King JL; Budowle B
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Sep; 12():192-8. PubMed ID: 25016249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Use of buccal swab as a source of genomic DNA for genetic screening in patients with age-related macular degeneration].
    Xu YL; Zhou HY; Xu J; Liu NP
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Feb; 48(2):114-8. PubMed ID: 22490945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of Maximum DNA Yield from a New Noninvasive Buccal Collection Device Following Various Extraction Protocols.
    Pißarreck M; Moreira F; Foley M
    Genet Test Mol Biomarkers; 2021 May; 25(5):376-380. PubMed ID: 33926219
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Double swab technique for collecting touched evidence.
    Pang BC; Cheung BK
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2007 Jul; 9(4):181-4. PubMed ID: 17320457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Study of criteria influencing the success rate of DNA swabs in operational conditions: A contribution to an evidence-based approach to crime scene investigation and triage.
    Baechler S
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Jan; 20():130-139. PubMed ID: 26590861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Impact of swab material on microbial surface sampling.
    Jansson L; Akel Y; Eriksson R; Lavander M; Hedman J
    J Microbiol Methods; 2020 Sep; 176():106006. PubMed ID: 32721418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Non-Invasive DNA Sampling for Molecular Analysis of Beta-Thalassemia: Amiable Alternative Sampling Methods with Accurate Results for Pediatric Patients.
    Abd Rahim MR; Kho SL; Kuppusamy UR; Tan JA
    Clin Lab; 2015; 61(9):1325-30. PubMed ID: 26554253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Factors affecting DNA recovery from cartridge cases.
    Jansson L; Forsberg C; Akel Y; Dufva C; Ansell C; Ansell R; Hedman J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Sep; 48():102343. PubMed ID: 32683317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Comparison of rayon and flocked swabs for collection and transport of deep throat swabs for detection of bacteria causing whooping cough by multiplex real-time PCR assay.].
    Pimenova AS; Borisova OY; Petrova MS; Gadua NT; Borisova AB; Kafarskaya LI; Afanasiev SS
    Klin Lab Diagn; 2019; 64(8):493-496. PubMed ID: 31479606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparative analysis between saliva and buccal swabs as source of DNA: lesson from HLA-B*57:01 testing.
    Cascella R; Stocchi L; Strafella C; Mezzaroma I; Mannazzu M; Vullo V; Montella F; Parruti G; Borgiani P; Sangiuolo F; Novelli G; Pirazzoli A; Zampatti S; Giardina E
    Pharmacogenomics; 2015; 16(10):1039-46. PubMed ID: 26230858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Investigation into ethylene oxide treatment and residuals on DNA and downstream DNA analysis.
    Wilson-Wilde L; Yakovchyts D; Neville S; Maynard P; Gunn P
    Sci Justice; 2017 Jan; 57(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 28063580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Role of oral fluids in DNA investigations.
    Pandeshwar P; Das R
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2014 Feb; 22():45-50. PubMed ID: 24485421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of DNA typing success in compromised blood and touch samples based on sampling swab composition.
    Smith C; Cox JO; Rhodes C; Lewis C; Koroma M; Hudson BC; Dawson Cruz T; Seashols-Williams SJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 Jul; 66(4):1427-1434. PubMed ID: 33624316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. New oral cut-off time limits in NSW.
    Nittis M; Franco M; Cochrane C
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2016 Nov; 44():92-97. PubMed ID: 27697690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Influence of swabbing solution and swab type on DNA recovery from rigid environmental surfaces.
    You HS; Lee SH; Ok YJ; Kang HG; Sung HJ; Lee JY; Kang SS; Hyun SH
    J Microbiol Methods; 2019 Jun; 161():12-17. PubMed ID: 31004622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Procurement, Transportation, and Storage of Saliva, Buccal Swab, and Oral Wash Specimens.
    Woo JS; Lu DY
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1897():99-105. PubMed ID: 30539438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Contribution to the Development of Guidelines in the Analysis of Biological Evidence in Sexual Assault Investigations.
    Ferreira-Silva B; Porto MJ; Magalhães T; Cainé L
    J Forensic Sci; 2019 Mar; 64(2):534-538. PubMed ID: 30025166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.