BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29890011)

  • 41. Developmental validation of the ANDE™ rapid DNA system with FlexPlex™ assay for arrestee and reference buccal swab processing and database searching.
    Carney C; Whitney S; Vaidyanathan J; Persick R; Noel F; Vallone PM; Romsos EL; Tan E; Grover R; Turingan RS; French JL; Selden RF
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 May; 40():120-130. PubMed ID: 30818156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Improved recovery of Bacillus spores from nonporous surfaces with cotton swabs over foam, nylon, or polyester, and the role of hydrophilicity of cotton in governing the recovery efficiency.
    Thomas P; Mujawar MM; Upreti R; Sekhar AC
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2013 Jan; 79(1):381-4. PubMed ID: 23087040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Swab sample transfer for point-of-care diagnostics: characterization of swab types and manual agitation methods.
    Panpradist N; Toley BJ; Zhang X; Byrnes S; Buser JR; Englund JA; Lutz BR
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(9):e105786. PubMed ID: 25181250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Fast and simple DNA extraction from saliva and sperm cells obtained from the skin or isolated from swabs.
    von Wurmb-Schwark N; Mályusz V; Fremdt H; Koch C; Simeoni E; Schwark T
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2006 May; 8(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 16516526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Sperm cell purification from mock forensic swabs using SOMAmer™ affinity reagents.
    Katilius E; Carmel AB; Koss H; O'Connell D; Smith BC; Sanders GM; LaBerge GS
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Jul; 35():9-13. PubMed ID: 29609058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Evaluation of Skin Surface as an Alternative Source of Reference DNA Samples: A Pilot Study.
    Albujja MH; Bin Dukhyil AA; Chaudhary AR; Kassab AC; Refaat AM; Babu SR; Okla MK; Kumar S
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 Jan; 63(1):227-233. PubMed ID: 28230906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The double-swab technique versus single swabs for human DNA recovery from various surfaces.
    Hedman J; Jansson L; Akel Y; Wallmark N; Gutierrez Liljestrand R; Forsberg C; Ansell R
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 May; 46():102253. PubMed ID: 32007674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [A foldable cardboard box for drying and storage of by cotton swab collected biological samples].
    Hochmeister M; Rudin O; Meier R; Peccioli M; Borer U; Eisenberg A; Nagy R; Dirnhofer R
    Arch Kriminol; 1997; 200(3-4):113-20. PubMed ID: 9446522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Direct PCR Improves the Recovery of DNA from Various Substrates.
    Templeton JE; Taylor D; Handt O; Skuza P; Linacre A
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Nov; 60(6):1558-62. PubMed ID: 26264133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. PE-Swab Direct STR Amplification of Forensic Touch DNA Samples.
    Liu JY
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 May; 60(3):693-701. PubMed ID: 25684449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Touch DNA recovery from vehicle surfaces using different swabs.
    Giovanelli A; Grazinoli Garrido R; Rocha A; Hessab T
    J Forensic Sci; 2022 Mar; 67(2):707-711. PubMed ID: 34725823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A holistic approach for the selection of forensic DNA swabs.
    Comment D; Gouy A; Zingg C; Zieger M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2023 Jul; 348():111737. PubMed ID: 37247525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Evaluation of buccal swabs for pharmacogenetics.
    Ang JS; Aloise MN; Dawes D; Dempster MG; Fraser R; Paterson A; Stanley P; Suarez-Gonzalez A; Dawes M; Katzov-Eckert H
    BMC Res Notes; 2018 Jun; 11(1):382. PubMed ID: 29898767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. DNA methylation of the ELOVL2, FHL2, KLF14, C1orf132/MIR29B2C, and TRIM59 genes for age prediction from blood, saliva, and buccal swab samples.
    Jung SE; Lim SM; Hong SR; Lee EH; Shin KJ; Lee HY
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jan; 38():1-8. PubMed ID: 30300865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The application of alkaline lysis and pressure cycling technology in the differential extraction of DNA from sperm and epithelial cells recovered from cotton swabs.
    Nori DV; McCord BR
    Anal Bioanal Chem; 2015 Sep; 407(23):6975-84. PubMed ID: 26055880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Collection techniques of touch DNA deposited on human skin following a strangulation scenario.
    Alketbi SK
    Int J Legal Med; 2023 Sep; 137(5):1347-1352. PubMed ID: 37278841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Salmon sperm DNA increases sample recovery from cotton swabs.
    Oechsle CM; Paul TA; Seichko JD; Worst TJ
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2024 Mar; 69():102996. PubMed ID: 38061289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Buccal DNA samples for DNA typing: new collection and processing methods.
    Burger MF; Song EY; Schumm JW
    Biotechniques; 2005 Aug; 39(2):257-61. PubMed ID: 16116799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Comparison of different collection procedures and two methods for DNA isolation from saliva.
    Durdiaková J; Kamodyová N; Ostatníková D; Vlková B; Celec P
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2012 Apr; 50(4):643-7. PubMed ID: 22149741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Evaluation of Direct PCR Amplification Using Various Swabs and Washing Reagents.
    Altshuler H; Roy R
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Nov; 60(6):1542-52. PubMed ID: 26331283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.