259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29890614)
1. Urban expansion simulation and the spatio-temporal changes of ecosystem services, a case study in Atlanta Metropolitan area, USA.
Sun X; Crittenden JC; Li F; Lu Z; Dou X
Sci Total Environ; 2018 May; 622-623():974-987. PubMed ID: 29890614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Spatiotemporal assessment and trade-offs of multiple ecosystem services based on land use changes in Zengcheng, China.
Sun X; Li F
Sci Total Environ; 2017 Dec; 609():1569-1581. PubMed ID: 28810509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improving ecosystem services supply provides insights for sustainable landscape planning: A case study in Beijing, China.
Sun X; Yang P; Tao Y; Bian H
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Jan; 802():149849. PubMed ID: 34455273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Do urban planning policies meet sustainable urbanization goals? A scenario-based study in Beijing, China.
Xu Q; Zheng X; Zheng M
Sci Total Environ; 2019 Jun; 670():498-507. PubMed ID: 30904661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of land use change on the ecosystem service trade-offs in the ecological restoration area: Dynamics and scenarios in the Yanhe watershed, China.
Yang S; Zhao W; Liu Y; Wang S; Wang J; Zhai R
Sci Total Environ; 2018 Dec; 644():556-566. PubMed ID: 29990905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dynamic evolution and scenario simulation of habitat quality under the impact of land-use change in the Huaihe River Economic Belt, China.
Tang F; Fu M; Wang L; Song W; Yu J; Wu Y
PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0249566. PubMed ID: 33819303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multi-Scenario Simulation to Predict Ecological Risk Posed by Urban Sprawl with Spontaneous Growth: A Case Study of Quanzhou.
Liao J; Tang L; Shao G
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Nov; 19(22):. PubMed ID: 36430080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Exploring ecosystem services and scenario simulation in the headwaters of Qiantang River watershed of China.
Sun X; Zhang Y; Shen Y; Randhir TO; Cao M
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Dec; 26(34):34905-34923. PubMed ID: 31656994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Spatial-Temporal Variations and Trade-Offs of Ecosystem Services in Anhui Province, China.
Yang Q; Zhang P; Qiu X; Xu G; Chi J
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Jan; 20(1):. PubMed ID: 36613177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analyzing the provision of ecosystem services by conservation easements and other protected and non-protected areas in the Upper Chattahoochee Watershed.
Benez-Secanho FJ; Dwivedi P
Sci Total Environ; 2020 May; 717():137218. PubMed ID: 32092803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Thriving arid oasis urban agglomerations: Optimizing ecosystem services pattern under future climate change scenarios using dynamic Bayesian network.
Huang H; Xue J; Feng X; Zhao J; Sun H; Hu Y; Ma Y
J Environ Manage; 2024 Jan; 350():119612. PubMed ID: 38035503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing potential ecosystem service dynamics driven by urbanization in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China.
Chen D; Jiang P; Li M
J Environ Manage; 2021 Aug; 292():112734. PubMed ID: 33984640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Spatiotemporal patterns and drivers of ecosystem service supply and demand across the conterminous United States: A multiscale analysis.
Sun X; Tang H; Yang P; Hu G; Liu Z; Wu J
Sci Total Environ; 2020 Feb; 703():135005. PubMed ID: 31733497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantifying ecosystem services supply and demand shortfalls and mismatches for management optimisation.
Chen J; Jiang B; Bai Y; Xu X; Alatalo JM
Sci Total Environ; 2019 Feb; 650(Pt 1):1426-1439. PubMed ID: 30308830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impacts of land use/land cover changes on ecosystem services in ecologically fragile regions.
Fang Z; Ding T; Chen J; Xue S; Zhou Q; Wang Y; Wang Y; Huang Z; Yang S
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Jul; 831():154967. PubMed ID: 35367552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Land-planning management based on multiple ecosystem services and simulation in tropical forests.
Fan F; Xiao C; Feng Z; Chen Y
J Environ Manage; 2022 Dec; 323():116216. PubMed ID: 36137459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Identification of priority conservation areas based on ecosystem services and systematic conservation planning analysis.
Wang K; Li S; Zhu Z; Gao X; Li X; Tang W; Liang J
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Mar; 30(13):36573-36587. PubMed ID: 36550250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Integrating ecosystem services trade-offs with paddy land-to-dry land decisions: A scenario approach in Erhai Lake Basin, southwest China.
Hu Y; Peng J; Liu Y; Tian L
Sci Total Environ; 2018 Jun; 625():849-860. PubMed ID: 29306828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Scenario simulation of ecosystem service trade-offs in bay cities: A case study in Quanzhou, Fujian Province, China].
DU Y; Shui W; Sun XR; Yang HF; Zheng JY
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2019 Dec; 30(12):4293-4302. PubMed ID: 31840476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analyzing Land-Use Change Scenarios for Ecosystem Services and their Trade-Offs in the Ecological Conservation Area in Beijing, China.
Li Z; Cheng X; Han H
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Nov; 17(22):. PubMed ID: 33233725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
