271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29891097)
1. Impact of dose engine algorithm in pencil beam scanning proton therapy for breast cancer.
Tommasino F; Fellin F; Lorentini S; Farace P
Phys Med; 2018 Jun; 50():7-12. PubMed ID: 29891097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improvements in pencil beam scanning proton therapy dose calculation accuracy in brain tumor cases with a commercial Monte Carlo algorithm.
Widesott L; Lorentini S; Fracchiolla F; Farace P; Schwarz M
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jul; 63(14):145016. PubMed ID: 29726402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Radiobiological and dosimetric impact of RayStation pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms on intensity-modulated proton therapy breast cancer plans.
Rana S; Greco K; Samuel EJJ; Bennouna J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 20(8):36-46. PubMed ID: 31343826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantifying the effect of air gap, depth, and range shifter thickness on TPS dosimetric accuracy in superficial PBS proton therapy.
Shirey RJ; Wu HT
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 19(1):164-173. PubMed ID: 29239528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of the RayStation Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm using a realistic lung phantom.
Schreuder AN; Bridges DS; Rigsby L; Blakey M; Janson M; Hedrick SG; Wilkinson JB
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Dec; 20(12):127-137. PubMed ID: 31763759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Technical note: Evaluation and second check of a commercial Monte Carlo dose engine for small-field apertures in pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
Holmes J; Shen J; Shan J; Patrick CL; Wong WW; Foote RL; Patel SH; Bues M; Liu W
Med Phys; 2022 May; 49(5):3497-3506. PubMed ID: 35305269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of TPS calculation algorithms on dose delivered to the patient in proton therapy treatments.
Molinelli S; Russo S; Magro G; Maestri D; Mairani A; Mastella E; Mirandola A; Vai A; Vischioni B; Valvo F; Ciocca M
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Apr; 64(7):075016. PubMed ID: 30802887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of two pencil beam scanning treatment planning systems for proton therapy.
Langner UW; Mundis M; Strauss D; Zhu M; Mossahebi S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 19(1):156-163. PubMed ID: 29205763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A pencil beam algorithm for magnetic resonance image-guided proton therapy.
Padilla-Cabal F; Georg D; Fuchs H
Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):2195-2204. PubMed ID: 29532490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of the RayStation Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm using realistic animal tissue phantoms.
Schreuder AN; Bridges DS; Rigsby L; Blakey M; Janson M; Hedrick SG; Wilkinson JB
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Oct; 20(10):160-171. PubMed ID: 31541536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comprehensive dosimetric study of Monte Carlo and pencil-beam algorithms on intensity-modulated proton therapy for breast cancer.
Liang X; Li Z; Zheng D; Bradley JA; Rutenberg M; Mendenhall N
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 20(1):128-136. PubMed ID: 30488548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of proton dose calculation algorithms on the interplay effect in PBS proton based SBRT lung plans.
Rana S; Rosenfeld AB
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2021 May; 7(4):. PubMed ID: 34029212
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Commissioning of pencil beam and Monte Carlo dose engines for non-isocentric treatments in scanned proton beam therapy.
Carlino A; Böhlen T; Vatnitsky S; Grevillot L; Osorio J; Dreindl R; Palmans H; Stock M; Kragl G
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Aug; 64(17):17NT01. PubMed ID: 31342920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the ray-casting analytical algorithm for pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
Winterhalter C; Zepter S; Shim S; Meier G; Bolsi A; Fredh A; Hrbacek J; Oxley D; Zhang Y; Weber DC; Lomax A; Safai S
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Mar; 64(6):065021. PubMed ID: 30641496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Experimental benchmarking of RayStation proton dose calculation algorithms inside and outside the target region in heterogeneous phantom geometries.
Ruangchan S; Knäusl B; Fuchs H; Georg D; Clausen M
Phys Med; 2020 Aug; 76():182-193. PubMed ID: 32693355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical validation of a GPU-based Monte Carlo dose engine of a commercial treatment planning system for pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
Fracchiolla F; Engwall E; Janson M; Tamm F; Lorentini S; Fellin F; Bertolini M; Algranati C; Righetto R; Farace P; Amichetti M; Schwarz M
Phys Med; 2021 Aug; 88():226-234. PubMed ID: 34311160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Measurements of in-air spot size of pencil proton beam for various air gaps in conjunction with a range shifter on a ProteusPLUS PBS dedicated machine and comparison to the proton dose calculation algorithms.
Rana S; Samuel EJJ
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2019 Sep; 42(3):853-862. PubMed ID: 31222565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. FRoG dose computation meets Monte Carlo accuracy for proton therapy dose calculation in lung.
Magro G; Mein S; Kopp B; Mastella E; Pella A; Ciocca M; Mairani A
Phys Med; 2021 Jun; 86():66-74. PubMed ID: 34058719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance of a hybrid Monte Carlo-Pencil Beam dose algorithm for proton therapy inverse planning.
Barragán Montero AM; Souris K; Sanchez-Parcerisa D; Sterpin E; Lee JA
Med Phys; 2018 Feb; 45(2):846-862. PubMed ID: 29159915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical examination of proton pencil beam scanning on a moving anthropomorphic lung phantom.
Wang P; Tang S; Taylor PA; Cummings DE; Janson M; Traneus E; Sturgeon JD; Lee AK; Chang C
Med Dosim; 2019 Summer; 44(2):122-129. PubMed ID: 29759487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
