These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29891206)

  • 1. Association of Interim FDG-PET Imaging During Chemoradiation for Squamous Anal Canal Carcinoma With Recurrence.
    Hong JC; Cui Y; Patel BN; Rushing CN; Faught AM; Eng JS; Higgins K; Yin FF; Das S; Czito BG; Willett CG; Palta M
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2018 Nov; 102(4):1046-1051. PubMed ID: 29891206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Role of 18F-FDG PET-derived parameters for predicting complete response to chemoradiotherapy in squamous cell anal carcinoma.
    Filippi L; Fontana A; Spinelli GP; Rossi L; Bagni O
    Nucl Med Commun; 2020 Oct; 41(10):1089-1094. PubMed ID: 32732599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Anal cancer chemoradiotherapy outcome prediction using
    Rusten E; Rekstad BL; Undseth C; Klotz D; Hernes E; Guren MG; Malinen E
    Br J Radiol; 2019 May; 92(1097):20181006. PubMed ID: 30810343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. FDG-PET parameters predict for recurrence in anal cancer - results from a prospective, multicentre clinical trial.
    Jones MP; Hruby G; Metser U; Sridharan S; Capp A; Kumar M; Gallagher S; Rutherford N; Holder C; Oldmeadow C; Martin J
    Radiat Oncol; 2019 Aug; 14(1):140. PubMed ID: 31387597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prognostic utility of pre- and post-treatment FDG-PET parameters in anal squamous cell carcinoma.
    Duimering A; Riauka T; Nijjar Y; Ghosh S; MacEwan R; Warkentin H; Schiller D; Tankel K; Usmani N; Severin D; Nijjar T; Fairchild A; Mulder K; Doll C; Wong C; Joseph K
    Radiother Oncol; 2019 Jul; 136():21-28. PubMed ID: 31015125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prognostic impact of tumour burden assessed by metabolic tumour volume on FDG PET/CT in anal canal cancer.
    Gauthé M; Richard-Molard M; Fayard J; Alberini JL; Cacheux W; Lièvre A
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 Jan; 44(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 27503193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Metabolic parameters of sequential 18F-FDG PET/CT predict overall survival of esophageal cancer patients treated with (chemo-) radiation.
    Li Y; Zschaeck S; Lin Q; Chen S; Chen L; Wu H
    Radiat Oncol; 2019 Feb; 14(1):35. PubMed ID: 30782182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pre- and per-treatment 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters to predict recurrence and survival in cervical cancer.
    Leseur J; Roman-Jimenez G; Devillers A; Ospina-Arango JD; Williaume D; Castelli J; Terve P; Lavoue V; Garin E; Lejeune F; Acosta O; De Crevoisier R
    Radiother Oncol; 2016 Sep; 120(3):512-518. PubMed ID: 27569847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Role of
    Houard C; Pinaquy JB; Mesguich C; Henriques de Figueiredo B; Cazeau AL; Allard JB; Laharie H; Bordenave L; Fernandez P; Vendrely V
    J Nucl Med; 2017 Sep; 58(9):1414-1420. PubMed ID: 28280225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prognostic value of metabolic tumor burden from (18)F-FDG PET in surgical patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.
    Zhang H; Wroblewski K; Liao S; Kampalath R; Penney BC; Zhang Y; Pu Y
    Acad Radiol; 2013 Jan; 20(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 22999369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Anal cancer FDG-PET standard uptake value: correlation with tumor characteristics, treatment response and survival.
    Deantonio L; Milia ME; Cena T; Sacchetti G; Perotti C; Brambilla M; Turri L; Krengli M
    Radiol Med; 2016 Jan; 121(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 26126968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Metabolic tumour volume of anal carcinoma on (18)FDG PET/CT before combined radiochemotherapy is the only independant determinant of recurrence free survival.
    Mohammadkhani Shali S; Schmitt V; Behrendt FF; Winz OH; Heinzel A; Mottaghy FM; Eble MJ; Verburg FA
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Aug; 85(8):1390-4. PubMed ID: 27423677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prognostic Value of Volumetric Parameters Measured by Pretreatment 18F FDG PET/CT in Patients With Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma.
    Son SH; Kang SM; Jeong SY; Lee SW; Lee SJ; Lee J; Ahn BC
    Clin Nucl Med; 2016 Jun; 41(6):e266-73. PubMed ID: 27055144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. FDG-PET parameters as predictors of pathologic response and nodal clearance in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgery.
    Arnett AL; Packard AT; Mara K; Mansfield AS; Wigle DA; Haddock MG; Park SS; Olivier KR; Garces YI; Merrell KW
    Pract Radiat Oncol; 2017; 7(6):e531-e541. PubMed ID: 28733185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prognostic significance of standardized uptake value and metabolic tumour volume on ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.
    Kim JW; Oh JS; Roh JL; Kim JS; Choi SH; Nam SY; Kim SY
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015 Aug; 42(9):1353-61. PubMed ID: 26067088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does baseline [18F] FDG-PET/CT correlate with tumor staging, response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, and prognosis in patients with rectal cancer?
    Deantonio L; Caroli A; Puta E; Ferrante D; Apicella F; Turri L; Sacchetti G; Brambilla M; Krengli M
    Radiat Oncol; 2018 Oct; 13(1):211. PubMed ID: 30359275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. 18F-FDG PET/CT metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis predict outcome in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.
    Lim R; Eaton A; Lee NY; Setton J; Ohri N; Rao S; Wong R; Fury M; Schöder H
    J Nucl Med; 2012 Oct; 53(10):1506-13. PubMed ID: 22895812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prognostic significance of standardized uptake value on F18-FDG PET/CT in patients with extranodal nasal type NK/T cell lymphoma: A multicenter, retrospective analysis.
    Pak K; Kim BS; Kim K; Kim IJ; Jun S; Jeong YJ; Shim HK; Kim SD; Cho KS
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2018; 39(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 29056243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prognostic value of
    Lee JR; Almuhaimid TM; Roh JL; Oh JS; Kim SJ; Kim JS; Choi SH; Nam SY; Kim SY
    J Surg Oncol; 2018 Sep; 118(4):644-650. PubMed ID: 30132891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prognostic role of baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT metabolic parameters in Burkitt lymphoma.
    Albano D; Bosio G; Pagani C; Re A; Tucci A; Giubbini R; Bertagna F
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2019 Jan; 46(1):87-96. PubMed ID: 30276438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.