These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29892393)

  • 41. Social Context Enhances Hormonal Modulation of Pheromone Detection in Drosophila.
    Sethi S; Lin HH; Shepherd AK; Volkan PC; Su CY; Wang JW
    Curr Biol; 2019 Nov; 29(22):3887-3898.e4. PubMed ID: 31679932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Male size does not affect the strength of male mate choice for high-quality females in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Lev A; Pischedda A
    J Evol Biol; 2023 Sep; 36(9):1255-1265. PubMed ID: 37534751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Feminization of pheromone-sensing neurons affects mating decisions in Drosophila males.
    Lu B; Zelle KM; Seltzer R; Hefetz A; Ben-Shahar Y
    Biol Open; 2014 Feb; 3(2):152-60. PubMed ID: 24463366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Gender differences in species recognition and the evolution of asymmetric sexual isolation.
    Svensson EI; Karlsson K; Friberg M; Eroukhmanoff F
    Curr Biol; 2007 Nov; 17(22):1943-7. PubMed ID: 17935996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Drosophila melanogaster males respond differently at the behavioural and genome-wide levels to Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans females.
    Ellis LL; Carney GE
    J Evol Biol; 2009 Nov; 22(11):2183-91. PubMed ID: 19765174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Interspecific variation in sex-specific gustatory organs in Drosophila.
    Kopp A; Barmina O
    J Comp Neurol; 2022 Oct; 530(14):2439-2450. PubMed ID: 35603778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Sexual isolation between Drosophila melanogaster, D. simulans and D. mauritiana: sex and species specific discrimination.
    Carracedo MC; Suarez C; Casares P
    Genetica; 2000; 108(2):155-62. PubMed ID: 11138943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The
    Chowdhury T; Calhoun RM; Bruch K; Moehring AJ
    Proc Biol Sci; 2020 Mar; 287(1923):20192765. PubMed ID: 32208837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Divergence of premating behaviors in the closely related species Drosophila subquinaria and D. recens.
    Giglio EM; Dyer KA
    Ecol Evol; 2013 Feb; 3(2):365-74. PubMed ID: 23467696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Sexual isolation and cuticular hydrocarbons in Drosophila elegans.
    Ishii K; Hirai Y; Katagiri C; Kimura MT
    Heredity (Edinb); 2001 Oct; 87(Pt 4):392-9. PubMed ID: 11737286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Ontogeny of Drosophila melanogaster female sex-appeal and cuticular hydrocarbons.
    Arienti M; Antony C; Wicker-Thomas C; Delbecque JP; Jallon JM
    Integr Zool; 2010 Sep; 5(3):272-82. PubMed ID: 21392345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A modular circuit architecture coordinates the diversification of courtship strategies in
    Coleman RT; Morantte I; Koreman GT; Cheng ML; Ding Y; Ruta V
    bioRxiv; 2023 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 37745588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Neuronal modulation of D. melanogaster sexual behaviour.
    Ellendersen BE; von Philipsborn AC
    Curr Opin Insect Sci; 2017 Dec; 24():21-28. PubMed ID: 29208219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Courtship initiation is stimulated by acoustic signals in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Ejima A; Griffith LC
    PLoS One; 2008 Sep; 3(9):e3246. PubMed ID: 18802468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Sexual isolation and cuticular hydrocarbon differences between Drosophila santomea and Drosophila yakuba.
    Mas F; Jallon JM
    J Chem Ecol; 2005 Nov; 31(11):2747-52. PubMed ID: 16132336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Generalization of courtship learning in Drosophila is mediated by cis-vaccenyl acetate.
    Ejima A; Smith BP; Lucas C; van der Goes van Naters W; Miller CJ; Carlson JR; Levine JD; Griffith LC
    Curr Biol; 2007 Apr; 17(7):599-605. PubMed ID: 17363250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The genetics of mating recognition between Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia.
    Civetta A; Cantor EJ
    Genet Res; 2003 Oct; 82(2):117-26. PubMed ID: 14768896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Sexual Communication in the Drosophila Genus.
    Bontonou G; Wicker-Thomas C
    Insects; 2014 Jun; 5(2):439-58. PubMed ID: 26462693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Female Choice or Male Sex Drive? The Advantages of Male Body Size during Mating in Drosophila Melanogaster.
    Jagadeeshan S; Shah U; Chakrabarti D; Singh RS
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0144672. PubMed ID: 26658421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Pheromonal and behavioral cues trigger male-to-female aggression in Drosophila.
    Fernández MP; Chan YB; Yew JY; Billeter JC; Dreisewerd K; Levine JD; Kravitz EA
    PLoS Biol; 2010 Nov; 8(11):e1000541. PubMed ID: 21124886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.