These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29892612)

  • 1. Data for validation of osteometric methods in forensic anthropology.
    Langley NR; Jantz LM; McNulty S; Maijanen H; Ousley SD; Jantz RL
    Data Brief; 2018 Aug; 19():21-28. PubMed ID: 29892612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Error quantification of osteometric data in forensic anthropology.
    Langley NR; Meadows Jantz L; McNulty S; Maijanen H; Ousley SD; Jantz RL
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Jun; 287():183-189. PubMed ID: 29698914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Examining Interobserver Reliability of Metric and Morphoscopic Characteristics of the Mandible.
    Byrnes JF; Kenyhercz MW; Berg GE
    J Forensic Sci; 2017 Jul; 62(4):981-985. PubMed ID: 27982434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy and reliability of measurements obtained from computed tomography 3D volume rendered images.
    Stull KE; Tise ML; Ali Z; Fowler DR
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 May; 238():133-40. PubMed ID: 24713466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy and reliability of virtual femur measurement from CT scan.
    Ismail NA; Abdullah N; Mohamad Noor MH; Lai PS; Shafie MS; Nor FM
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2019 Apr; 63():11-17. PubMed ID: 30825771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Error measurement in craniometrics: The comparative performance of four popular assessment methods using 2000 simulated cranial length datasets (g-op).
    Fancourt HSM; Stephan CN
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Apr; 285():162-171. PubMed ID: 29501053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measurement standards for human metacarpals.
    Case DT; Rawlins CM; Mick CB
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2015 Jun; 157(2):322-9. PubMed ID: 25639619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interobserver variation of selected postcranial skeletal measurements.
    Adams BJ; Byrd JE
    J Forensic Sci; 2002 Nov; 47(6):1193-202. PubMed ID: 12455639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Consistency of selected craniometric landmark locations and the resulting variation in measurements.
    Smith AC; Boaks A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Nov; 280():156-163. PubMed ID: 29055251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of Three Commonly Used Tibia Length Measurement Techniques.
    Lynch JJ; Maijanen H; Prescher A
    J Forensic Sci; 2019 Jan; 64(1):181-185. PubMed ID: 30001468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Osteometric sex determination of burned human skeletal remains.
    Gonçalves D; Thompson TJ; Cunha E
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2013 Oct; 20(7):906-11. PubMed ID: 24112343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Testing inter-observer reliability of the Transition Analysis aging method on the William M. Bass forensic skeletal collection.
    Fojas CL; Kim J; Minsky-Rowland JD; Algee-Hewitt BFB
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2018 Jan; 165(1):183-193. PubMed ID: 29072307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tables for the metric evaluation of pair-matching of human skeletal elements.
    Thomas RM; Ubelaker DH; Byrd JE
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 Jul; 58(4):952-6. PubMed ID: 23682771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sexual dimorphism of the tibia in contemporary Greek-Cypriots and Cretans: Forensic applications.
    Kranioti EK; García-Donas JG; Almeida Prado PS; Kyriakou XP; Langstaff HC
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Feb; 271():129.e1-129.e7. PubMed ID: 27919515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Standardized anthropological measurement of postcranial bones using three-dimensional models in CAD software.
    Reynolds MS; MacGregor DM; Barry MD; Lottering N; Schmutz B; Wilson LJ; Meredith M; Gregory LS
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Sep; 278():381-387. PubMed ID: 28810162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dutch population specific sex estimation formulae using the proximal femur.
    Colman KL; Janssen MCL; Stull KE; van Rijn RR; Oostra RJ; de Boer HH; van der Merwe AE
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 May; 286():268.e1-268.e8. PubMed ID: 29548547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Z-Transform Method for Pairwise Osteometric Pair-matching.
    Warnke-Sommer JD; Lynch JJ; Pawaskar SS; Damann FE
    J Forensic Sci; 2019 Jan; 64(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 29758091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Power of Exclusion using Automated Osteometric Sorting: Pair-Matching.
    Lynch JJ; Byrd J; LeGarde CB
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 Mar; 63(2):371-380. PubMed ID: 28547802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Standardization and quality assurance in skeletal landmark placement and osteometry.
    Liebenberg L; Krüger GC
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Mar; 308():110168. PubMed ID: 32006879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Virtual forensic anthropology: The accuracy of osteometric analysis of 3D bone models derived from clinical computed tomography (CT) scans.
    Colman KL; de Boer HH; Dobbe JGG; Liberton NPTJ; Stull KE; van Eijnatten M; Streekstra GJ; Oostra RJ; van Rijn RR; van der Merwe AE
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Nov; 304():109963. PubMed ID: 31610335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.