244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29892934)
1. Minimally invasive esophagectomy in the prone position improves postoperative outcomes: role of C-reactive protein as an indicator of surgical invasiveness.
Koyanagi K; Ozawa S; Tachimori Y
Esophagus; 2018 Apr; 15(2):95-102. PubMed ID: 29892934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Utility of C-reactive protein as predictive biomarker of anastomotic leak after minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Asti E; Bonitta G; Melloni M; Tornese S; Milito P; Sironi A; Costa E; Bonavina L
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2018 Mar; 403(2):235-244. PubMed ID: 29516256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Minimally invasive esophagectomy performed with the patient in a prone position: a systematic review.
Koyanagi K; Ozawa S; Tachimori Y
Surg Today; 2016 Mar; 46(3):275-84. PubMed ID: 25860592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. C-Reactive Protein Indicates Early Stage of Postoperative Infectious Complications in Patients Following Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy.
Miki Y; Toyokawa T; Kubo N; Tamura T; Sakurai K; Tanaka H; Muguruma K; Yashiro M; Hirakawa K; Ohira M
World J Surg; 2017 Mar; 41(3):796-803. PubMed ID: 27878351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of preoperative risk factors and postoperative indicators for anastomotic leak of minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy: a single-center retrospective analysis.
Gao C; Xu G; Wang C; Wang D
J Cardiothorac Surg; 2019 Feb; 14(1):46. PubMed ID: 30819240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Surgical team proficiency in minimally invasive esophagectomy is related to case volume and improves patient outcomes.
Okamura A; Watanabe M; Fukudome I; Yamashita K; Yuda M; Hayami M; Imamura Y; Mine S
Esophagus; 2018 Apr; 15(2):115-121. PubMed ID: 29892937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Advantages of the prone position for minimally invasive esophagectomy in comparison to the left decubitus position: better oxygenation after minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Tanaka E; Okabe H; Kinjo Y; Tsunoda S; Obama K; Hisamori S; Sakai Y
Surg Today; 2015 Jul; 45(7):819-25. PubMed ID: 25387656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis of semiprone versus prone position.
Seesing MFJ; Goense L; Ruurda JP; Luyer MDP; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; van Hillegersberg R
Surg Endosc; 2018 Jun; 32(6):2758-2765. PubMed ID: 29209832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The impact of combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic surgery on pulmonary complications after radical esophagectomy in patients with resectable esophageal cancer.
Kubo N; Ohira M; Yamashita Y; Sakurai K; Toyokawa T; Tanaka H; Muguruma K; Shibutani M; Yamazoe S; Kimura K; Nagahara H; Amano R; Ohtani H; Yashiro M; Maeda K; Hirakawa K
Anticancer Res; 2014 May; 34(5):2399-404. PubMed ID: 24778050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Thoracoscopy in prone position with two-lung ventilation compared to conventional thoracotomy during Ivor Lewis procedure: a multicenter case-control study.
Souche R; Nayeri M; Chati R; Huet E; Donici I; Tuech JJ; Borie F; Prudhomme M; Jaber S; Fabre JM
Surg Endosc; 2020 Jan; 34(1):142-152. PubMed ID: 30868323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Utility of thoracic cage width in assessing surgical difficulty of minimally invasive esophagectomy in left lateral decubitus position.
Takeno S; Tanoue Y; Hamada R; Kawano F; Tashiro K; Wada T; Ikenoue M; Nanashima A; Nakamura K
Surg Endosc; 2020 Aug; 34(8):3479-3486. PubMed ID: 31576442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Outcomes With Open and Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy After Neoadjuvant Therapy.
Tapias LF; Mathisen DJ; Wright CD; Wain JC; Gaissert HA; Muniappan A; Lanuti M; Donahue DM; Morse CR
Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Mar; 101(3):1097-103. PubMed ID: 26652140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prognostic Value of Chest-Tube Amylase Versus C-Reactive Protein as Screening Tool for Detection of Early Anastomotic Leaks After Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy.
Giulini L; Dubecz A; Solymosi N; Tank J; Renz M; Thumfart L; Stein HJ
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2019 Feb; 29(2):192-197. PubMed ID: 30592690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Minimally invasive esophagectomy attenuates the postoperative inflammatory response and improves survival compared with open esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer: a propensity score matched analysis.
Yamashita K; Watanabe M; Mine S; Toihata T; Fukudome I; Okamura A; Yuda M; Hayami M; Ishizuka N; Imamura Y
Surg Endosc; 2018 Nov; 32(11):4443-4450. PubMed ID: 29644466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of intraoperative fluid management on postoperative complications in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a retrospective single-center study.
Takahashi M; Toyama H; Takahashi K; Kaiho Y; Ejima Y; Yamauchi M
BMC Anesthesiol; 2024 Jan; 24(1):29. PubMed ID: 38238681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. C-reactive protein and drain amylase: their utility in ruling out anastomotic leakage after minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy.
Stuart SK; Kuypers TJL; Martijnse IS; Heisterkamp J; Matthijsen RA
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2023 May; 58(5):448-452. PubMed ID: 36346047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Do alterations in plasma albumin and prealbumin after minimally invasive esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma influence the incidence of cervical anastomotic leak?
Wang YJ; Liu XH; Mei LY; Li KK; Jiang YG; Guo W
Surg Endosc; 2016 Sep; 30(9):3943-9. PubMed ID: 26694179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: Lateral decubitus vs. prone positioning; systematic review and pooled analysis.
Markar SR; Wiggins T; Antonowicz S; Zacharakis E; Hanna GB
Surg Oncol; 2015 Sep; 24(3):212-9. PubMed ID: 26096374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Attempted validation of the NUn score and inflammatory markers as predictors of esophageal anastomotic leak and major complications.
Findlay JM; Tilson RC; Harikrishnan A; Sgromo B; Marshall RE; Maynard ND; Gillies RS; Middleton MR
Dis Esophagus; 2015 Oct; 28(7):626-33. PubMed ID: 24894195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of C-reactive protein for the early prediction of anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: Systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis.
Aiolfi A; Asti E; Rausa E; Bonavina G; Bonitta G; Bonavina L
PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0209272. PubMed ID: 30557392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
