128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29893058)
21. Care-seeking behavior of Japanese gynecological cancer survivors suffering from adverse effects.
Oshima S; Kisa K; Terashita T; Kawabata H; Maezawa M
BMC Womens Health; 2013 Jan; 13():1. PubMed ID: 23295104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A qualitative study of Japanese patients' perspectives on post-treatment care for gynecological cancer.
Oshima S; Kisa K; Terashita T; Habara M; Kawabata H; Maezawa M
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(9):2255-61. PubMed ID: 22296366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A better model of care after surgery for early endometrial cancer - Comprehensive needs assessment and clinical handover to a woman's general practitioner.
Rio IM; McNally O
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2017 Oct; 57(5):558-563. PubMed ID: 28691771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Physical Activity Correlates, Barriers, and Preferences for Women With Gynecological Cancer.
Farrokhzadi L; Dhillon HM; Goumas C; Young JM; Cust AE
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Oct; 26(8):1530-7. PubMed ID: 27488217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Adherence to national guidelines for surveillance after curative resection of nonmetastatic colon and rectum cancer: a survey among Norwegian gastrointestinal surgeons.
Søreide K; Træland JH; Stokkeland PJ; Glomsaker T; Søreide JA; Kørner H
Colorectal Dis; 2012 Mar; 14(3):320-4. PubMed ID: 21689321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Assessing the Effects of Participant Preference and Demographics in the Usage of Web-based Survey Questionnaires by Women Attending Screening Mammography in British Columbia.
Mlikotic R; Parker B; Rajapakshe R
J Med Internet Res; 2016 Mar; 18(3):e70. PubMed ID: 27005707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. French women's representations and experiences of the post-treatment management of breast cancer and their perception of the general practitioner's role in follow-up care: A qualitative study.
Laporte C; Vaure J; Bottet A; Eschalier B; Raineau C; Pezet D; Vorilhon P
Health Expect; 2017 Aug; 20(4):788-796. PubMed ID: 27899006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Preferences for long-term follow-up care in childhood cancer survivors.
Michel G; Gianinazzi ME; Eiser C; Bergstraesser E; Vetsch J; von der Weid N; Kuehni CE;
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2016 Nov; 25(6):1024-1033. PubMed ID: 27550385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Discharge of breast cancer patients to primary care at the end of hospital follow-up: a cross-sectional survey.
Roorda C; Berendsen AJ; Haverkamp M; van der Meer K; de Bock GH
Eur J Cancer; 2013 May; 49(8):1836-44. PubMed ID: 23453936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Paradoxes of follow-up - health professionals' views on follow-up after surgical treatment in gynecological cancer.
Dahl L; Wittrup I; Petersen LK; Blaakaer J; Væggemose U
Acta Oncol; 2015 Feb; 54(2):194-9. PubMed ID: 25017380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The effect of generic switching on concerns about medicine and non-persistence among Danish adults in a general practice setting.
Rathe JØ
Dan Med J; 2015 Oct; 62(10):B5148. PubMed ID: 26441397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. What do patients bring up in consultations? An observational study in general practice.
Bjørland E; Brekke M
Scand J Prim Health Care; 2015; 33(3):206-11. PubMed ID: 26205343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Routine follow-up care after curative treatment of head and neck cancer: A survey of patients' needs and preferences for healthcare services.
Brennan KE; Hall SF; Yoo J; Rohland SL; Theurer J; Peng Y; Feldman-Stewart D
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2019 Mar; 28(2):e12993. PubMed ID: 30656777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The MELFO-Study: Prospective, Randomized, Clinical Trial for the Evaluation of a Stage-adjusted Reduced Follow-up Schedule in Cutaneous Melanoma Patients-Results after 1 Year.
Damude S; Hoekstra-Weebers JE; Francken AB; Ter Meulen S; Bastiaannet E; Hoekstra HJ
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Sep; 23(9):2762-71. PubMed ID: 27194552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Patient reported late effects of gynecological cancer treatment.
Grover S; Hill-Kayser CE; Vachani C; Hampshire MK; DiLullo GA; Metz JM
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Mar; 124(3):399-403. PubMed ID: 22119992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Exploring the acceptability and feasibility of patient-initiated follow-up for women treated for stage I endometrial cancer.
Beaver K; Martin-Hirsch P; Williamson S; Kyrgiou M
Eur J Oncol Nurs; 2020 Feb; 44():101704. PubMed ID: 31812918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Parents' preferences for the organisation of long-term follow-up of childhood cancer survivors.
Vetsch J; Rueegg CS; Mader L; Bergstraesser E; Diezi M; Kuehni CE; Michel G;
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2018 Mar; 27(2):e12649. PubMed ID: 28134478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Eliciting Preferences for Clinical Follow-Up in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer Using Best-Worst Scaling.
Meregaglia M; Cairns J; Alfieri S; Favales F; Mazzitelli D; Orlandi E; Licitra L; Bossi P
Value Health; 2017 Jun; 20(6):799-808. PubMed ID: 28577698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Use of shared care and routine tests in follow-up after treatment for localised cutaneous melanoma.
Lim WY; Turner RM; Morton RL; Jenkins MC; Irwig L; Webster AC; Dieng M; Saw RPM; Guitera P; Low D; Low C; Bell KJL
BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Jun; 18(1):477. PubMed ID: 29925350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Experiences of general practitioner continuity among women with chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis: a cross-sectional study.
Hansen AH; Lian OS
BMC Health Serv Res; 2016 Nov; 16(1):650. PubMed ID: 27842587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
