These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29893183)

  • 1. Attitudes and perceptions of Conacyt researchers towards public communication of science and technology.
    Sanz Merino N; Tarhuni Navarro DH
    Public Underst Sci; 2019 Jan; 28(1):85-100. PubMed ID: 29893183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Scientists' opinions and attitudes towards citizens' understanding of science and their role in public engagement activities.
    Llorente C; Revuelta G; Carrió M; Porta M
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0224262. PubMed ID: 31721768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A study on biomedical researchers' perspectives on public engagement in Southeast Asia.
    Tran Dong Thai H; Van Thuy Qui H; Vu Duy T; Fisher J; Chambers M
    Wellcome Open Res; 2023; 8():202. PubMed ID: 37766854
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lithuanian scientists' behavior and views on science communication.
    Valinciute A
    Public Underst Sci; 2020 Apr; 29(3):353-362. PubMed ID: 32126899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Values and vendettas: Populist science governance in Mexico.
    Reyes-Galindo L
    Soc Stud Sci; 2023 Apr; 53(2):213-241. PubMed ID: 36468621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measuring risk/benefit perceptions of emerging technologies and their potential impact on communication of public opinion toward science.
    Binder AR; Cacciatore MA; Scheufele DA; Shaw BR; Corley EA
    Public Underst Sci; 2012 Oct; 21(7):830-47. PubMed ID: 23832561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The modeling of science: the example of North America].
    Morán-Mendoza AO
    Rev Invest Clin; 2004; 56(5):665-74. PubMed ID: 15776871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mexico's Program for Science and Technology, 1978 to 1982.
    Flores E
    Science; 1979 Jun; 204(4399):1279-82. PubMed ID: 17813156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A survey to gather perspectives of DBT/Wellcome Trust India Alliance-funded researchers on public engagement with science.
    Iqbal S; Kar B
    Wellcome Open Res; 2021; 6():269. PubMed ID: 35509370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison between scientists' and communication scholars' views about scientists' public engagement activities.
    Yuan S; Besley JC; Dudo A
    Public Underst Sci; 2019 Jan; 28(1):101-118. PubMed ID: 30175667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The lure of rationality: Why does the deficit model persist in science communication?
    Simis MJ; Madden H; Cacciatore MA; Yeo SK
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 May; 25(4):400-14. PubMed ID: 27117768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Developing Science Communication in Africa: Undergraduate and Graduate Students should be Trained and Actively Involved in Outreach Activity Development and Implementation.
    Karikari TK; Yawson NA; Quansah E
    J Undergrad Neurosci Educ; 2016; 14(2):E5-8. PubMed ID: 27385932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of social identity threat and social identity affirmation on laypersons' perception of scientists.
    Nauroth P; Gollwitzer M; Kozuchowski H; Bender J; Rothmund T
    Public Underst Sci; 2017 Oct; 26(7):754-770. PubMed ID: 26902257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rethinking the relationship between science and society: Has there been a shift in attitudes to Patient and Public Involvement and Public Engagement in Science in the United Kingdom?
    Boaz A; Biri D; McKevitt C
    Health Expect; 2016 Jun; 19(3):592-601. PubMed ID: 25359425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Experiments in engagement: Designing public engagement with science and technology for capacity building.
    Selin C; Rawlings KC; de Ridder-Vignone K; Sadowski J; Altamirano Allende C; Gano G; Davies SR; Guston DH
    Public Underst Sci; 2017 Aug; 26(6):634-649. PubMed ID: 26769749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pharmacogenomics research involving racial classification: qualitative research findings on researchers' views, perceptions and attitudes towards socioethical responsibilities.
    Egalité N; Ozdemir V; Godard B
    Pharmacogenomics; 2007 Sep; 8(9):1115-26. PubMed ID: 17924827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Understanding the public, the visitors, and the participants in science communication activities.
    Kato-Nitta N; Maeda T; Iwahashi K; Tachikawa M
    Public Underst Sci; 2018 Oct; 27(7):857-875. PubMed ID: 28778142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perceptions, relationships, expectations, and challenges: Views of communication and research for scientific dissemination in Brazilian Federal Institutes.
    Galvão T; Noll PRES; Noll M
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(10):e0258492. PubMed ID: 34648563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomedical Data Sharing and Reuse: Attitudes and Practices of Clinical and Scientific Research Staff.
    Federer LM; Lu YL; Joubert DJ; Welsh J; Brandys B
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0129506. PubMed ID: 26107811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How to (or not to) communicate science.
    Rose SP
    Biochem Soc Trans; 2003 Apr; 31(2):307-12. PubMed ID: 12653626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.