These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29894984)

  • 21. Multi-faceted Rasch measurement and bias patterns in EFL writing performance assessment.
    He TH; Gou WJ; Chien YC; Chen IS; Chang SM
    Psychol Rep; 2013 Apr; 112(2):469-85. PubMed ID: 23833876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Constructing rater and task banks for performance assessments.
    Engelhard G
    J Outcome Meas; 1997; 1(1):19-33. PubMed ID: 9661713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Selecting and Simplifying: Rater Performance and Behavior When Considering Multiple Competencies.
    Tavares W; Ginsburg S; Eva KW
    Teach Learn Med; 2016; 28(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 26787084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Detecting Differential Rater Functioning in Severity and Centrality: The Dual DRF Facets Model.
    Jin KY; Eckes T
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2022 Aug; 82(4):757-781. PubMed ID: 35754620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Does Sparseness Matter? Examining the Use of Generalizability Theory and Many-Facet Rasch Measurement in Sparse Rating Designs.
    Wind SA; Jones E; Grajeda S
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2023 Sep; 47(5-6):351-364. PubMed ID: 37810544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Predicting mastery level on a large-scale standardized patient test: a comparison of case and instrument score-based models using discriminant function analysis.
    De Champlain AF; Margolis MJ; Macmillan MK; Klass DJ
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2001; 6(2):151-8. PubMed ID: 11435765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Exploring the Combined Effects of Rater Misfit and Differential Rater Functioning in Performance Assessments.
    Wind SA; Guo W
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2019 Oct; 79(5):962-987. PubMed ID: 31488921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A surgery oral examination: interrater agreement and the influence of rater characteristics.
    Burchard KW; Rowland-Morin PA; Coe NP; Garb JL
    Acad Med; 1995 Nov; 70(11):1044-6. PubMed ID: 7575935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A new item response theory model for rater centrality using a hierarchical rater model approach.
    Qiu XL; Chiu MM; Wang WC; Chen PH
    Behav Res Methods; 2022 Aug; 54(4):1854-1868. PubMed ID: 34725802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Modeling error variance in job specification ratings: the influence of rater, job, and organization-level factors.
    Van Iddekinge CH; Putka DJ; Raymark PH; Eidson CE
    J Appl Psychol; 2005 Mar; 90(2):323-34. PubMed ID: 15769241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Non-ignorable missingness item response theory models for choice effects in examinee-selected items.
    Liu CW; Wang WC
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 Nov; 70(3):499-524. PubMed ID: 28390145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Investigation of standardized patient ratings of humanistic competence on a medical licensure examination using Many-Facet Rasch Measurement and generalizability theory.
    Zhang X; Roberts WL
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2013 Dec; 18(5):929-44. PubMed ID: 23224249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effective number of subjects and number of raters for inter-rater reliability studies.
    Saito Y; Sozu T; Hamada C; Yoshimura I
    Stat Med; 2006 May; 25(9):1547-60. PubMed ID: 16143966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Investigating rater-student interaction, gender bias, and major bias in the assessment of research seminar presentation.
    Arifiyanti F; Soeharto S; Amukune S; Van Nguyen S; Aburezeq K; Hidayatullah A; Sarimanah E
    Heliyon; 2023 Jun; 9(6):e16548. PubMed ID: 37274636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Item analysis for the written test of Taiwanese board certification examination in anaesthesiology using the Rasch model.
    Chang KY; Tsou MY; Chan KH; Chang SH; Tai JJ; Chen HH
    Br J Anaesth; 2010 Jun; 104(6):717-22. PubMed ID: 20427368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A Facets Analysis of Analytic vs. Holistic Scoring of Identical Short Constructed-Response Items: Different Outcomes and Their Implications for Scoring Rubric Development.
    Curcin M; Sweiry E
    J Appl Meas; 2017; 18(3):228-246. PubMed ID: 29579737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Planning a Study for Testing the Rasch Model given Missing Values due to the use of Test-booklets.
    Yanagida T; Kubinger KD; Rasch D
    J Appl Meas; 2015; 16(4):432-42. PubMed ID: 26771570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Expected linking error resulting from item parameter drift among the common Items on Rasch calibrated tests.
    Miller GE; Gesn PR; Rotou J
    J Appl Meas; 2005; 6(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 15701943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. An investigation of the generalizability and dependability of direct behavior rating single item scales (DBR-SIS) to measure academic engagement and disruptive behavior of middle school students.
    Chafouleas SM; Briesch AM; Riley-Tillman TC; Christ TJ; Black AC; Kilgus SP
    J Sch Psychol; 2010 Jun; 48(3):219-46. PubMed ID: 20380948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Detecting differential rater functioning over time (DRIFT) using a Rasch multi-faceted rating scale model.
    Wolfe EW; Moulder BC; Myford CM
    J Appl Meas; 2001; 2(3):256-80. PubMed ID: 12011510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.