194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29897342)
1. Motion artifacts in standard clinical setting obscure disease-specific differences in quantitative susceptibility mapping.
Meineke J; Wenzel F; De Marco M; Venneri A; Blackburn DJ; Teh K; Wilkinson ID; Katscher U
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jul; 63(14):14NT01. PubMed ID: 29897342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Human brain atlas for automated region of interest selection in quantitative susceptibility mapping: application to determine iron content in deep gray matter structures.
Lim IA; Faria AV; Li X; Hsu JT; Airan RD; Mori S; van Zijl PC
Neuroimage; 2013 Nov; 82():449-69. PubMed ID: 23769915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. STrategically Acquired Gradient Echo (STAGE) imaging, part I: Creating enhanced T1 contrast and standardized susceptibility weighted imaging and quantitative susceptibility mapping.
Chen Y; Liu S; Wang Y; Kang Y; Haacke EM
Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Feb; 46():130-139. PubMed ID: 29056394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multi-atlas tool for automated segmentation of brain gray matter nuclei and quantification of their magnetic susceptibility.
Li X; Chen L; Kutten K; Ceritoglu C; Li Y; Kang N; Hsu JT; Qiao Y; Wei H; Liu C; Miller MI; Mori S; Yousem DM; van Zijl PCM; Faria AV
Neuroimage; 2019 May; 191():337-349. PubMed ID: 30738207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prospective motion correction improves high-resolution quantitative susceptibility mapping at 7T.
Mattern H; Sciarra A; Lüsebrink F; Acosta-Cabronero J; Speck O
Magn Reson Med; 2019 Mar; 81(3):1605-1619. PubMed ID: 30298692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Whole head quantitative susceptibility mapping using a least-norm direct dipole inversion method.
Sun H; Ma Y; MacDonald ME; Pike GB
Neuroimage; 2018 Oct; 179():166-175. PubMed ID: 29906634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Background field removal using a region adaptive kernel for quantitative susceptibility mapping of human brain.
Fang J; Bao L; Li X; van Zijl PCM; Chen Z
J Magn Reson; 2017 Aug; 281():130-140. PubMed ID: 28595120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantitative susceptibility mapping for susceptibility source separation with adaptive relaxometric constant estimation (QSM-ARCS) from solely gradient-echo data.
Kan H; Uchida Y; Kawaguchi S; Kasai H; Hiwatashi A; Ueki Y
Neuroimage; 2024 Aug; 296():120676. PubMed ID: 38852804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Correction of magnetic field inhomogeneity effects for fast quantitative susceptibility mapping.
Ngo GC; Bilgic B; Gagoski BA; Sutton BP
Magn Reson Med; 2019 Mar; 81(3):1645-1658. PubMed ID: 30387905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Patterns of Brain Iron Accumulation in Vascular Dementia and Alzheimer's Dementia Using Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping Imaging.
Moon Y; Han SH; Moon WJ
J Alzheimers Dis; 2016; 51(3):737-45. PubMed ID: 26890777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Phase-based masking for quantitative susceptibility mapping of the human brain at 9.4T.
Hagberg GE; Eckstein K; Tuzzi E; Zhou J; Robinson S; Scheffler K
Magn Reson Med; 2022 Nov; 88(5):2267-2276. PubMed ID: 35754142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical Integration of Automated Processing for Brain Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping: Multi-Site Reproducibility and Single-Site Robustness.
Spincemaille P; Liu Z; Zhang S; Kovanlikaya I; Ippoliti M; Makowski M; Watts R; de Rochefort L; Venkatraman V; Desmond P; Santin MD; Lehéricy S; Kopell BH; Péran P; Wang Y
J Neuroimaging; 2019 Nov; 29(6):689-698. PubMed ID: 31379055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of quantitative susceptibility mapping methods for iron-sensitive susceptibility imaging at 7T: An evaluation in healthy subjects and patients with Huntington's disease.
Yao J; Morrison MA; Jakary A; Avadiappan S; Chen Y; Luitjens J; Glueck J; Driscoll T; Geschwind MD; Nelson AB; Villanueva-Meyer JE; Hess CP; Lupo JM
Neuroimage; 2023 Jan; 265():119788. PubMed ID: 36476567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Subcortical gray matter segmentation and voxel-based analysis using transverse relaxation and quantitative susceptibility mapping with application to multiple sclerosis.
Cobzas D; Sun H; Walsh AJ; Lebel RM; Blevins G; Wilman AH
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Dec; 42(6):1601-10. PubMed ID: 25980643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Maximum spherical mean value filtering for whole-brain QSM.
Roberts AG; Romano DJ; Şişman M; Dimov AV; Nguyen TD; Kovanlikaya I; Gauthier SA; Wang Y; Spincemaille P
Magn Reson Med; 2024 Apr; 91(4):1586-1597. PubMed ID: 38169132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. msQSM: Morphology-based self-supervised deep learning for quantitative susceptibility mapping.
He J; Peng Y; Fu B; Zhu Y; Wang L; Wang R
Neuroimage; 2023 Jul; 275():120181. PubMed ID: 37220799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Multiecho complex total field inversion method (mcTFI) for improved signal modeling in quantitative susceptibility mapping.
Wen Y; Spincemaille P; Nguyen T; Cho J; Kovanlikaya I; Anderson J; Wu G; Yang B; Fung M; Li K; Kelley D; Benhamo N; Wang Y
Magn Reson Med; 2021 Oct; 86(4):2165-2178. PubMed ID: 34028868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping for Following Intracranial Hemorrhage.
Sun H; Klahr AC; Kate M; Gioia LC; Emery DJ; Butcher KS; Wilman AH
Radiology; 2018 Sep; 288(3):830-839. PubMed ID: 29916778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative susceptibility mapping across two clinical field strengths: Contrast-to-noise ratio enhancement at 1.5T.
Ippoliti M; Adams LC; Winfried B; Hamm B; Spincemaille P; Wang Y; Makowski MR
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Nov; 48(5):1410-1420. PubMed ID: 29659131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robust breast quantitative susceptibility mapping in the presence of silicone.
Böhm C; Stelter JK; Weiss K; Meineke J; Komenda A; Borde T; Makowski MR; Fallenberg EM; Karampinos DC
Magn Reson Med; 2023 Sep; 90(3):1209-1218. PubMed ID: 37125658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
