362 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29897410)
1. iProt-Sub: a comprehensive package for accurately mapping and predicting protease-specific substrates and cleavage sites.
Song J; Wang Y; Li F; Akutsu T; Rawlings ND; Webb GI; Chou KC
Brief Bioinform; 2019 Mar; 20(2):638-658. PubMed ID: 29897410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Twenty years of bioinformatics research for protease-specific substrate and cleavage site prediction: a comprehensive revisit and benchmarking of existing methods.
Li F; Wang Y; Li C; Marquez-Lago TT; Leier A; Rawlings ND; Haffari G; Revote J; Akutsu T; Chou KC; Purcell AW; Pike RN; Webb GI; Ian Smith A; Lithgow T; Daly RJ; Whisstock JC; Song J
Brief Bioinform; 2019 Nov; 20(6):2150-2166. PubMed ID: 30184176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. PROSPER: an integrated feature-based tool for predicting protease substrate cleavage sites.
Song J; Tan H; Perry AJ; Akutsu T; Webb GI; Whisstock JC; Pike RN
PLoS One; 2012; 7(11):e50300. PubMed ID: 23209700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Procleave: Predicting Protease-specific Substrate Cleavage Sites by Combining Sequence and Structural Information.
Li F; Leier A; Liu Q; Wang Y; Xiang D; Akutsu T; Webb GI; Smith AI; Marquez-Lago T; Li J; Song J
Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics; 2020 Feb; 18(1):52-64. PubMed ID: 32413515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. PROSPERous: high-throughput prediction of substrate cleavage sites for 90 proteases with improved accuracy.
Song J; Li F; Leier A; Marquez-Lago TT; Akutsu T; Haffari G; Chou KC; Webb GI; Pike RN; Hancock J
Bioinformatics; 2018 Feb; 34(4):684-687. PubMed ID: 29069280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predicting Proteolysis in Complex Proteomes Using Deep Learning.
Ozols M; Eckersley A; Platt CI; Stewart-McGuinness C; Hibbert SA; Revote J; Li F; Griffiths CEM; Watson REB; Song J; Bell M; Sherratt MJ
Int J Mol Sci; 2021 Mar; 22(6):. PubMed ID: 33803033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. ProsperousPlus: a one-stop and comprehensive platform for accurate protease-specific substrate cleavage prediction and machine-learning model construction.
Li F; Wang C; Guo X; Akutsu T; Webb GI; Coin LJM; Kurgan L; Song J
Brief Bioinform; 2023 Sep; 24(6):. PubMed ID: 37874948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bioinformatic approaches for predicting substrates of proteases.
Song J; Tan H; Boyd SE; Shen H; Mahmood K; Webb GI; Akutsu T; Whisstock JC; Pike RN
J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2011 Feb; 9(1):149-78. PubMed ID: 21328711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cascleave 2.0, a new approach for predicting caspase and granzyme cleavage targets.
Wang M; Zhao XM; Tan H; Akutsu T; Whisstock JC; Song J
Bioinformatics; 2014 Jan; 30(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 24149049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prediction of HIV-1 protease cleavage site using a combination of sequence, structural, and physicochemical features.
Singh O; Su EC
BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Dec; 17(Suppl 17):478. PubMed ID: 28155640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prediction and design of protease enzyme specificity using a structure-aware graph convolutional network.
Lu C; Lubin JH; Sarma VV; Stentz SZ; Wang G; Wang S; Khare SD
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2023 Sep; 120(39):e2303590120. PubMed ID: 37729196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Proteolysis to Identify Protease Substrates: Cleave to Decipher.
Bhagwat SR; Hajela K; Kumar A
Proteomics; 2018 Jul; 18(13):e1800011. PubMed ID: 29710386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. CalCleaveMKL: a Tool for Calpain Cleavage Prediction.
duVerle DA; Mamitsuka H
Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1915():121-147. PubMed ID: 30617801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Profiling the Extended Cleavage Specificity of the House Dust Mite Protease Allergens Der p 1, Der p 3 and Der p 6 for the Prediction of New Cell Surface Protein Substrates.
Jacquet A; Campisi V; Szpakowska M; Dumez ME; Galleni M; Chevigné A
Int J Mol Sci; 2017 Jun; 18(7):. PubMed ID: 28654001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predicting Structural Susceptibility of Proteins to Proteolytic Processing.
Matveev EV; Safronov VV; Ponomarev GV; Kazanov MD
Int J Mol Sci; 2023 Jun; 24(13):. PubMed ID: 37445939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Large-Scale Structure-Based Prediction and Identification of Novel Protease Substrates Using Computational Protein Design.
Pethe MA; Rubenstein AB; Khare SD
J Mol Biol; 2017 Jan; 429(2):220-236. PubMed ID: 27932294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Protease proteomics: revealing protease in vivo functions using systems biology approaches.
Doucet A; Overall CM
Mol Aspects Med; 2008 Oct; 29(5):339-58. PubMed ID: 18571712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prediction of Proteases Involved in Peptide Generation.
Casteleiro MA; Stevens R; Klein J
Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1574():205-213. PubMed ID: 28315253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Toward more accurate prediction of caspase cleavage sites: a comprehensive review of current methods, tools and features.
Bao Y; Marini S; Tamura T; Kamada M; Maegawa S; Hosokawa H; Song J; Akutsu T
Brief Bioinform; 2019 Sep; 20(5):1669-1684. PubMed ID: 29860277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Deep profiling of protease substrate specificity enabled by dual random and scanned human proteome substrate phage libraries.
Zhou J; Li S; Leung KK; O'Donovan B; Zou JY; DeRisi JL; Wells JA
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Oct; 117(41):25464-25475. PubMed ID: 32973096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
