These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29897924)
1. Predicting perceived level of disturbance of visitors due to crowding in protected areas. Klanjšček J; Geček S; Marn N; Legović T; Klanjšček T PLoS One; 2018; 13(6):e0197932. PubMed ID: 29897924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Past on-site experience, crowding perceptions, and use displacement of visitor groups to a peri-urban national park. Arnberger A; Brandenburg C Environ Manage; 2007 Jul; 40(1):34-45. PubMed ID: 17546521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The nature of the pandemic: Exploring the negative impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic upon recreation visitor behaviors and experiences in parks and protected areas. Ferguson MD; Lynch ML; Evensen D; Ferguson LA; Barcelona R; Giles G; Leberman M J Outdoor Recreat Tour; 2023 Mar; 41():100498. PubMed ID: 37521260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of place attachment and experience use history on perceived depreciative visitor behavior and crowding in an urban national park. Eder R; Arnberger A Environ Manage; 2012 Oct; 50(4):566-80. PubMed ID: 22824961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A model for predicting daily peak visitation and implications for recreation management and water quality: evidence from two rivers in Puerto Rico. Santiago LE; Gonzalez-Caban A; Loomis J Environ Manage; 2008 Jun; 41(6):904-14. PubMed ID: 18330620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Problems of outdoor recreation: the effect of visitors' demographics on the perceptions of Termessos National Park, Turkey. Sayan S; Karagüzel O Environ Manage; 2010 Jun; 45(6):1257-70. PubMed ID: 20464398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The influence of visitor use levels on visitor spatial behavior in off-trail areas of dispersed recreation use. D'Antonio A; Monz C J Environ Manage; 2016 Apr; 170():79-87. PubMed ID: 26803258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Visitor perceptions and the shifting social carrying capacity of South Sinai's coral reefs. Leujak W; Ormond RF Environ Manage; 2007 Apr; 39(4):472-89. PubMed ID: 17318694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The digitalization of outdoor recreation: Global perspectives on the opportunities and challenges for protected area management. Mangold M; Schwietering A; Zink J; Steinbauer MJ; Heurich M J Environ Manage; 2024 Feb; 352():120108. PubMed ID: 38244406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reducing visitor noise levels at Muir Woods National Monument using experimental management. Stack DW; Peter N; Manning RE; Fristrup KM J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Mar; 129(3):1375-80. PubMed ID: 21428501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Benefits-based analysis of visitor use of Sorak-san National Park in Korea. Shin WS; Jaakson R; Kim EI Environ Manage; 2001 Sep; 28(3):413-9. PubMed ID: 11531242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Toward the improvement of trail classification in national parks using the recreation opportunity spectrum approach. Oishi Y Environ Manage; 2013 Jun; 51(6):1126-36. PubMed ID: 23615956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Harmonizing outdoor recreation and bird conservation targets in protected areas: Applying available monitoring data to facilitate collaborative management at the regional scale. Pouwels R; Sierdsema H; Foppen RPB; Henkens RJHG; Opdam PFM; van Eupen M J Environ Manage; 2017 Aug; 198(Pt 1):248-255. PubMed ID: 28467949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Understanding park visitors' soundscape perception using subjective and objective measurement. Ferguson LA; Taff BD; Blanford JI; Mennitt DJ; Mowen AJ; Levenhagen M; White C; Monz CA; Francis CD; Barber JR; Newman P PeerJ; 2024; 12():e16592. PubMed ID: 38313034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improving understanding and management of the complex relationship between visitor motivations and spatial behaviors in parks and protected areas. Sisneros-Kidd AM; D'Antonio A; Monz C; Mitrovich M J Environ Manage; 2021 Feb; 280():111841. PubMed ID: 33370670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Social carrying capacity and emotion dynamics in urban national parks during the COVID-19 pandemic. Xiao X; Gao J; Lu J; Li P; Zhang Y J Outdoor Recreat Tour; 2023 Mar; 41():100451. PubMed ID: 38620877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An interpretive study of Yosemite National Park visitors' perspectives toward alternative transportation in Yosemite Valley. White DD Environ Manage; 2007 Jan; 39(1):50-62. PubMed ID: 17106793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Enhancing the utility of visitor impact assessment in parks and protected areas: a combined social-ecological approach. D'Antonio A; Monz C; Newman P; Lawson S; Taff D J Environ Manage; 2013 Jul; 124():72-81. PubMed ID: 23624424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Managing congestion at visitor hotspots using park-level use level data: Case study of a Chinese World Heritage Site. Guo JH; Guo T; Lin KM; Lin DD; Leung YF; Chen QH PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0215266. PubMed ID: 31348788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Proactive monitoring and adaptive management of social carrying capacity in Arches National Park: an application of computer simulation modeling. Lawson SR; Manning RE; Valliere WA; Wang B J Environ Manage; 2003 Jul; 68(3):305-13. PubMed ID: 12837259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]