These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29899638)

  • 1. Evaluation of remaining dentin thickness and fracture resistance of conventional and conservative access and biomechanical preparation in molars using cone-beam computed tomography: An
    Makati D; Shah NC; Brave D; Singh Rathore VP; Bhadra D; Dedania MS
    J Conserv Dent; 2018; 21(3):324-327. PubMed ID: 29899638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative evaluation of pericervical dentin preservation and fracture resistance of root canal-treated teeth with rotary endodontic file systems of different types of taper - An
    Shyma P; Mathew J; George L; Vineet RV; Paul S; Joy A
    J Conserv Dent Endod; 2023; 26(4):429-433. PubMed ID: 37705541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Effect of Different Access Cavity Designs in Combination with WaveOne Gold and TruNatomy Instrumentation on Remaining Dentin Thickness and Volume.
    Vorster M; van der Vyver PJ; Markou G
    J Endod; 2023 Jan; 49(1):83-88. PubMed ID: 36375650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative Evaluation of Efficiency of Different File Systems in Terms of Remaining Dentin Thickness Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: An
    Chaudhary NR; Singh DJ; Somani R; Jaidka S
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2018; 9(3):367-371. PubMed ID: 30166828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of remaining dentin thickness following use of three different rotary nickel-titanium retreatment files: A cone-beam computed tomography study.
    Kulkarni NR; Kamat SB; Hugar SI; Nanjannawar GS; Patil PD
    J Conserv Dent; 2019; 22(6):588-592. PubMed ID: 33088071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impacts of conservative endodontic cavity on root canal instrumentation efficacy and resistance to fracture assessed in incisors, premolars, and molars.
    Krishan R; Paqué F; Ossareh A; Kishen A; Dao T; Friedman S
    J Endod; 2014 Aug; 40(8):1160-6. PubMed ID: 25069925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparative evaluation of the effect of different access cavity designs on root canal instrumentation efficacy and resistance to fracture assessed on maxillary central incisors: An
    Sarvaiya UP; Rudagi K; Joseph J
    J Conserv Dent; 2020; 23(6):609-614. PubMed ID: 34083918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of access cavity preparation on the dentine thickness of mesial canals of mandibular molars prepared with reciprocating instruments.
    Silva EJNL; Lima CO; Barbosa AFA; Moreira T; Souza EM; De-Deus G; Versiani MA
    Int Endod J; 2022 Jan; 55(1):113-123. PubMed ID: 34601728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative assessment of the effects of Gates-Glidden, Largo, LA-Axxess, and New Brazilian Drill CPdrill on coronal pre-enlargement: cone-beam computed tomographic analysis.
    Flores CB; Montagner F; Gomes BP; Dotto GN; da Silva Schmitz M
    J Endod; 2014 Apr; 40(4):571-4. PubMed ID: 24666914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cone-beam Computed Tomography Evaluation of Root Canal Preparation using Various Rotary Instruments: An in vitro Study.
    Ramanathan S; Solete P
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 Nov; 16(11):869-72. PubMed ID: 26718293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of Cone-beam Computed Tomography in Measuring Dentin Thickness and Its Potential of Predicting the Remaining Dentin Thickness after Removing Fractured Instruments.
    Xu J; He J; Yang Q; Huang D; Zhou X; Peters OA; Gao Y
    J Endod; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1522-1527. PubMed ID: 28673490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of an electrical impedance device in estimation of remaining dentin thickness vs cone beam computed tomography.
    Sarhan H; Hamama H; Aboelmaaty W; Zaeneldin A; Mahmoud S
    Odontology; 2022 Jul; 110(3):489-496. PubMed ID: 35013814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cone-beam computed tomographic evaluation of remaining dentin thickness in bifurcated roots of maxillary first premolars after rotary instrumentation and post space preparation: An
    Mangal S; Mathew S; Sreenivasa Murthy BV; Nagaraja S; Dinesh K; Ramesh P
    J Conserv Dent; 2018; 21(1):63-67. PubMed ID: 29628650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cone beam computed tomographic evaluation of two access cavity designs and instrumentation on the thickness of peri-cervical dentin in mandibular anterior teeth.
    Varghese VS; George JV; Mathew S; Nagaraja S; Indiresha HN; Madhu KS
    J Conserv Dent; 2016; 19(5):450-4. PubMed ID: 27656065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impacts of 3 Different Endodontic Access Cavity Designs on Dentin Removal and Point of Entry in 3-dimensional Digital Models.
    Lin CY; Lin D; He WH
    J Endod; 2020 Apr; 46(4):524-530. PubMed ID: 32115250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of endodontic access cavity design on dentine removal and effectiveness of canal instrumentation in maxillary molars.
    Wang D; Wang W; Li YJ; Wang YR; Hong T; Bai SZ; Tian Y
    Int Endod J; 2021 Dec; 54(12):2290-2299. PubMed ID: 34459005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Direct Linear Measurement of Root Dentin Thickness and Dentin Volume Changes with Post Space Preparation: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study.
    Shaikh SY; Shaikh SS
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2018; 9(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 29599589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cone-beam Computed Tomography Volumetric Analysis and Comparison of Dentin Structure Loss after Retrieval of Separated Instrument by Using Ultrasonic EMS and ProUltra Tips.
    Garg H; Grewal MS
    J Endod; 2016 Nov; 42(11):1693-1698. PubMed ID: 27637461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparative assessment of fracture resistance of endodontically treated and re-treated teeth: An in vitro study.
    Ganesh A; Venkateshbabu N; John A; Deenadhayalan G; Kandaswamy D
    J Conserv Dent; 2014 Jan; 17(1):61-4. PubMed ID: 24554864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative Evaluation of Efficiency of Different Endodontic File Systems; Protaper Universal, MTWO, Protaper Next, Trunatomy, I-Race in Terms of Remaining Dentin Thickness: An
    Retnakaran A; Gaffoor FMA; Gopakumar R; Girish CS; Sajeena NC; Krishna NG
    J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2024 Apr; 16(Suppl 2):S1409-S1413. PubMed ID: 38882834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.