649 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29899969)
21. Molecular, Cellular and Pharmaceutical Aspects of Synthetic Hydroxyapatite Bone Substitutes for Oral and Maxillofacial Grafting.
Gotz W; Papageorgiou SN
Curr Pharm Biotechnol; 2017; 18(1):95-106. PubMed ID: 27915980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Nonoperative and Operative Soft-Tissue and Cartilage Regeneration and Orthopaedic Biologics of the Foot and Ankle: An Orthoregeneration Network Foundation Review.
Danilkowicz R; Murawski C; Pellegrini M; Walther M; Valderrabano V; Angthong C; Adams S
Arthroscopy; 2022 Jul; 38(7):2350-2358. PubMed ID: 35605840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparative performance of three ceramic bone graft substitutes.
Hing KA; Wilson LF; Buckland T
Spine J; 2007; 7(4):475-90. PubMed ID: 17630146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Bone Substitute Options for Spine Fusion in Patients With Spine Trauma-Part I: Fusion Biology, Autografts, Allografts, Demineralized Bone Matrix, and Ceramics.
Lee BJ; Seok MC; Koo HW; Jeong JH; Ko MJ
Korean J Neurotrauma; 2023 Dec; 19(4):446-453. PubMed ID: 38222832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Molecular basis for action of bioactive glasses as bone graft substitute.
Välimäki VV; Aro HT
Scand J Surg; 2006; 95(2):95-102. PubMed ID: 16821652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Interconnected porous hydroxyapatite ceramics for bone tissue engineering.
Yoshikawa H; Tamai N; Murase T; Myoui A
J R Soc Interface; 2009 Jun; 6 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S341-8. PubMed ID: 19106069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Inflammatory-Driven Angiogenesis in Bone Augmentation with Bovine Hydroxyapatite, B-Tricalcium Phosphate, and Bioglasses: A Comparative Study.
Anghelescu VM; Neculae I; Dincă O; Vlădan C; Socoliuc C; Cioplea M; Nichita L; Popp C; Zurac S; Bucur A
J Immunol Res; 2018; 2018():9349207. PubMed ID: 30298138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Histological and radiographic evaluations of demineralized bone matrix and coralline hydroxyapatite in the rabbit tibia.
Zhukauskas R; Dodds RA; Hartill C; Arola T; Cobb RR; Fox C
J Biomater Appl; 2010 Mar; 24(7):639-56. PubMed ID: 19581323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Bone graft substitutes and bone morphogenetic proteins for osteoporotic fractures: what is the evidence?
Van Lieshout EM; Alt V
Injury; 2016 Jan; 47 Suppl 1():S43-6. PubMed ID: 26768291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Compositions and Structural Geometries of Scaffolds Used in the Regeneration of Cleft Palates: A Review of the Literature.
Reyna-Urrutia VA; González-González AM; Rosales-Ibáñez R
Polymers (Basel); 2022 Jan; 14(3):. PubMed ID: 35160534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. GelMA-based bioactive hydrogel scaffolds with multiple bone defect repair functions: therapeutic strategies and recent advances.
Zhou B; Jiang X; Zhou X; Tan W; Luo H; Lei S; Yang Y
Biomater Res; 2023 Sep; 27(1):86. PubMed ID: 37715230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Ceramic drug delivery: a perspective.
Paul W; Sharma CP
J Biomater Appl; 2003 Apr; 17(4):253-64. PubMed ID: 12797418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Bone grafts and biomaterials substitutes for bone defect repair: A review.
Wang W; Yeung KWK
Bioact Mater; 2017 Dec; 2(4):224-247. PubMed ID: 29744432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Bioresorbability, porosity and mechanical strength of bone substitutes: what is optimal for bone regeneration?
Hannink G; Arts JJ
Injury; 2011 Sep; 42 Suppl 2():S22-5. PubMed ID: 21714966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Bone Healing Materials in the Treatment of Recalcitrant Nonunions and Bone Defects.
Rodríguez-Merchán EC
Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Mar; 23(6):. PubMed ID: 35328773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Current knowledge and perspectives for the use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) in oral and maxillofacial surgery part 2: Bone graft, implant and reconstructive surgery.
Simonpieri A; Del Corso M; Vervelle A; Jimbo R; Inchingolo F; Sammartino G; Dohan Ehrenfest DM
Curr Pharm Biotechnol; 2012 Jun; 13(7):1231-56. PubMed ID: 21740370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Utilization of autogenous bone, bioactive glasses, and calcium phosphate cement in surgical mandibular bone defects in Cebus apella monkeys.
Cancian DC; Hochuli-Vieira E; Marcantonio RA; Garcia Júnior IR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 14982358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Biphasic calcium phosphate ceramics for bone reconstruction: A review of biological response.
Bouler JM; Pilet P; Gauthier O; Verron E
Acta Biomater; 2017 Apr; 53():1-12. PubMed ID: 28159720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Bone Grafts and Substitutes in Dentistry: A Review of Current Trends and Developments.
Zhao R; Yang R; Cooper PR; Khurshid Z; Shavandi A; Ratnayake J
Molecules; 2021 May; 26(10):. PubMed ID: 34070157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Synthetic and Bone tissue engineering graft substitutes: What is the future?
Valtanen RS; Yang YP; Gurtner GC; Maloney WJ; Lowenberg DW
Injury; 2021 Jun; 52 Suppl 2():S72-S77. PubMed ID: 32732118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
