These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29900689)

  • 1. Rapid Influence of Word-Talker Associations on Lexical Access.
    Kim J; Drager K
    Top Cogn Sci; 2018 Oct; 10(4):775-786. PubMed ID: 29900689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speech perception in children with cochlear implants: effects of lexical difficulty, talker variability, and word length.
    Kirk KI; Hay-McCutcheon M; Sehgal ST; Miyamoto RT
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 2000 Dec; 185():79-81. PubMed ID: 11141016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Heeding the voice of experience: the role of talker variation in lexical access.
    Creel SC; Aslin RN; Tanenhaus MK
    Cognition; 2008 Feb; 106(2):633-64. PubMed ID: 17507006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intelligibility of emotional speech in younger and older adults.
    Dupuis K; Pichora-Fuller MK
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):695-707. PubMed ID: 25127327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of lexical characteristics and talker accent on the recognition of English words by native speakers of Korean.
    Choi MK; Holliday JJ; Munson B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Aug; 150(2):769. PubMed ID: 34470323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of talker- and listener-related factors on intelligibility for a real-word, open-set perception test.
    Markham D; Hazan V
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Aug; 47(4):725-37. PubMed ID: 15324282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of talker-specific information in word segmentation by infants.
    Houston DM; Jusczyk PW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2000 Oct; 26(5):1570-82. PubMed ID: 11039485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Functionally integrated neural processing of linguistic and talker information: An event-related fMRI and ERP study.
    Zhang C; Pugh KR; Mencl WE; Molfese PJ; Frost SJ; Magnuson JS; Peng G; Wang WS
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jan; 124(Pt A):536-549. PubMed ID: 26343322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Talker normalization is mediated by structured indexical information.
    Stilp CE; Theodore RM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):2237-2243. PubMed ID: 32077069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Toward an integrative model of talker normalization.
    Zhang C; Chen S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1252-68. PubMed ID: 26950387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Words Get in the Way: Linguistic Effects on Talker Discrimination.
    Narayan CR; Mak L; Bialystok E
    Cogn Sci; 2017 Jul; 41(5):1361-1376. PubMed ID: 27445079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Individual Talker and Token Covariation in the Production of Multiple Cues to Stop Voicing.
    Clayards M
    Phonetica; 2018; 75(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 28595176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does Talker-Specific Information Influence Lexical Competition? Evidence From Phonological Priming.
    Dufour S; Nguyen N
    Cogn Sci; 2017 Nov; 41(8):2221-2233. PubMed ID: 27943403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hearing taboo words can result in early talker effects in word recognition for female listeners.
    Tuft SE; MᶜLennan CT; Krestar ML
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Feb; 71(2):435-448. PubMed ID: 27784198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On building models of spoken-word recognition: when there is as much to learn from natural "oddities" as artificial normality.
    Mattys SL; Liss JM
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Oct; 70(7):1235-42. PubMed ID: 18927006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Individual talker differences in voice-onset-time: contextual influences.
    Theodore RM; Miller JL; DeSteno D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):3974-82. PubMed ID: 19507979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How the tracking of habitual rate influences speech perception.
    Maslowski M; Meyer AS; Bosker HR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Jan; 45(1):128-138. PubMed ID: 29698048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. EEG activity evoked in preparation for multi-talker listening by adults and children.
    Holmes E; Kitterick PT; Summerfield AQ
    Hear Res; 2016 Jun; 336():83-100. PubMed ID: 27178442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Toddlers' comprehension of adult and child talkers: Adult targets versus vocal tract similarity.
    Cooper A; Fecher N; Johnson EK
    Cognition; 2018 Apr; 173():16-20. PubMed ID: 29287204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.