These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29900799)

  • 1. Influence of Multi-microphone Signal Enhancement Algorithms on the Acoustics and Detectability of Angular and Radial Source Movements.
    Lundbeck M; Hartog L; Grimm G; Hohmann V; Bramsløw L; Neher T
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518779719. PubMed ID: 29900799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sensitivity to Angular and Radial Source Movements as a Function of Acoustic Complexity in Normal and Impaired Hearing.
    Lundbeck M; Grimm G; Hohmann V; Laugesen S; Neher T
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517717152. PubMed ID: 28675088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Speech reception with different bilateral directional processing schemes: Influence of binaural hearing, audiometric asymmetry, and acoustic scenario.
    Neher T; Wagener KC; Latzel M
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():36-48. PubMed ID: 28783570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Noise reduction results of an adaptive filtering technique for dual-microphone behind-the-ear hearing aids.
    Maj JB; Wouters J; Moonen M
    Ear Hear; 2004 Jun; 25(3):215-29. PubMed ID: 15179113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of audiovisual ceiling performance on the relationship between reverberation and directional benefit: perception and prediction.
    Wu YH; Bentler RA
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(5):604-14. PubMed ID: 22677815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of directional hearing aid settings on different laboratory measures of spatial awareness perception.
    Lundbeck M; Grimm G; Hohmann V; Bramsløw L; Neher T
    Audiol Res; 2018 Oct; 8(2):215. PubMed ID: 30581544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of reverberation and noise on speech intelligibility in normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
    Xia J; Xu B; Pentony S; Xu J; Swaminathan J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Mar; 143(3):1523. PubMed ID: 29604671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Integrating a remote microphone with hearing-aid processing.
    Kates JM; Arehart KH; Harvey LO
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Jun; 145(6):3551. PubMed ID: 31255148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Signal-to-noise ratio advantage of binaural hearing aids and directional microphones under different levels of reverberation.
    Hawkins DB; Yacullo WS
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1984 Aug; 49(3):278-86. PubMed ID: 6748623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interactions Between Digital Noise Reduction and Reverberation: Acoustic and Behavioral Effects.
    Reinhart P; Zahorik P; Souza P
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Jan; 31(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 31267958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Effects of Hearing Impairment, Age, and Hearing Aids on the Use of Self-Motion for Determining Front/Back Location.
    Brimijoin WO; Akeroyd MA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Jul; 27(7):588-600. PubMed ID: 27406664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Potential benefits and limitations of three types of directional processing in hearing aids.
    Picou EM; Aspell E; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):339-52. PubMed ID: 24518429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies III: Speech Intelligibility of Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
    Völker C; Warzybok A; Ernst SM
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech recognition in noise using bilateral open-fit hearing aids: the limited benefit of directional microphones and noise reduction.
    Magnusson L; Claesson A; Persson M; Tengstrand T
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Jan; 52(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 22928919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Real-time multiband dynamic compression and noise reduction for binaural hearing aids.
    Kollmeier B; Peissig J; Hohmann V
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):82-94. PubMed ID: 8263832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Binaural noise-reduction hearing aid scheme with real-time processing in the frequency domain.
    Kollmeier B; Peissig J; Hohmann V
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():28-38. PubMed ID: 8153562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perception of Auditory Distance in Normal-Hearing and Moderate-to-Profound Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
    Courtois G; Grimaldi V; Lissek H; Estoppey P; Georganti E
    Trends Hear; 2019; 23():2331216519887615. PubMed ID: 31774032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of extreme adaptive frequency compression in bimodal listeners on sound localization and speech perception.
    Veugen LCE; Chalupper J; Mens LHM; Snik AFM; van Opstal AJ
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2017 Sep; 18(5):266-277. PubMed ID: 28726592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance of an adaptive beamforming noise reduction scheme for hearing aid applications. II. Experimental verification of the predictions.
    Kompis M; Dillier N
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Mar; 109(3):1134-43. PubMed ID: 11303927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.