These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29901443)

  • 1. Device specificity of vascular healing following implantation of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds and bioabsorbable polymer metallic drug-eluting stents in human coronary arteries: the ESTROFA OCT BVS vs. BP-DES study.
    de la Torre Hernandez JM; Gonzalo N; Otaegui I; Rumoroso JR; Gutiérrez H; Alfonso F; Marti G; Serrador-Frutos AM; Brugaletta S; Gomez Menchero A; Garcia Camarero T; Biagioni C; Escaned J
    EuroIntervention; 2018 Dec; 14(12):e1295-e1303. PubMed ID: 29901443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Different vascular healing process between bioabsorbable polymer-coated everolimus-eluting stents versus bioresorbable vascular scaffolds via optical coherence tomography and coronary angioscopy (the ENHANCE study: ENdothelial Healing Assessment with Novel Coronary tEchnology).
    Wan Ahmad WA; Nakayoshi T; Mahmood Zuhdi AS; Ismail MD; Zainal Abidin I; Ino Y; Kubo T; Akasaka T; Fukumoto Y; Ueno T
    Heart Vessels; 2020 Apr; 35(4):463-473. PubMed ID: 31587103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Head-to-head comparison of the neointimal response between metallic and bioresorbable everolimus-eluting scaffolds using optical coherence tomography.
    Gomez-Lara J; Brugaletta S; Farooq V; Onuma Y; Diletti R; Windecker S; Thuesen L; McClean D; Koolen J; Whitbourn R; Dudek D; Smits PC; Chevalier B; Regar E; Veldhof S; Rapoza R; Ormiston JA; Garcia-Garcia HM; Serruys PW
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Dec; 4(12):1271-80. PubMed ID: 22192368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optical coherence tomography-guided versus angiography-guided implantation of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds: Comparison of coverage, apposition and clinical outcome. The ALSTER-OCT ABSORB registry.
    Heeger CH; Schedifka AS; Meincke F; Spangenberg T; Wienemann H; Kreidel F; Kuck KH; Ghanem A; Bergmann MW
    Cardiol J; 2018; 25(4):459-469. PubMed ID: 29512092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Incidence and imaging outcomes of acute scaffold disruption and late structural discontinuity after implantation of the absorb Everolimus-Eluting fully bioresorbable vascular scaffold: optical coherence tomography assessment in the ABSORB cohort B Trial (A Clinical Evaluation of the Bioabsorbable Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients With De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions).
    Onuma Y; Serruys PW; Muramatsu T; Nakatani S; van Geuns RJ; de Bruyne B; Dudek D; Christiansen E; Smits PC; Chevalier B; McClean D; Koolen J; Windecker S; Whitbourn R; Meredith I; Garcia-Garcia HM; Veldhof S; Rapoza R; Ormiston JA
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Dec; 7(12):1400-11. PubMed ID: 25523532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fate of post-procedural malapposition of everolimus-eluting polymeric bioresorbable scaffold and everolimus-eluting cobalt chromium metallic stent in human coronary arteries: sequential assessment with optical coherence tomography in ABSORB Japan trial.
    Sotomi Y; Onuma Y; Dijkstra J; Miyazaki Y; Kozuma K; Tanabe K; Popma JJ; de Winter RJ; Serruys PW; Kimura T
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Jan; 19(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 28158421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Coronary evaginations and peri-scaffold aneurysms following implantation of bioresorbable scaffolds: incidence, outcome, and optical coherence tomography analysis of possible mechanisms.
    Gori T; Jansen T; Weissner M; Foin N; Wenzel P; Schulz E; Cook S; Münzel T
    Eur Heart J; 2016 Jul; 37(26):2040-9. PubMed ID: 26543048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. ABSORB biodegradable stents versus second-generation metal stents: a comparison study of 100 complex lesions treated under OCT guidance.
    Mattesini A; Secco GG; Dall'Ara G; Ghione M; Rama-Merchan JC; Lupi A; Viceconte N; Lindsay AC; De Silva R; Foin N; Naganuma T; Valente S; Colombo A; Di Mario C
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jul; 7(7):741-50. PubMed ID: 25060016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Vascular response to everolimus- and biolimus-eluting coronary stents versus everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds--an optical coherence tomography substudy of the EVERBIO II trial.
    Kallinikou Z; Arroyo D; Togni M; Lehman S; Corpataux N; Cook M; Müller O; Baeriswyl G; Stauffer JC; Goy JJ; Puricel SG; Cook S
    Swiss Med Wkly; 2016; 146():w14274. PubMed ID: 26766027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Two-year clinical, angiographic, and serial optical coherence tomographic follow-up after implantation of an everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold and an everolimus-eluting metallic stent: insights from the randomised ABSORB Japan trial.
    Onuma Y; Sotomi Y; Shiomi H; Ozaki Y; Namiki A; Yasuda S; Ueno T; Ando K; Furuya J; Igarashi K; Kozuma K; Tanabe K; Kusano H; Rapoza R; Popma JJ; Stone GW; Simonton C; Serruys PW; Kimura T
    EuroIntervention; 2016 Oct; 12(9):1090-1101. PubMed ID: 27597270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Real-World Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Experience Compared With Second-Generation Metallic Drug-Eluting Stents in Complex Coronary Lesions.
    Okamoto N; Ueda H; Yoshimura T; Chamaria S; Bhatheja S; Vengrenyuk Y; Rabiei S; Barrientos Y; Kapur V; Barman N; Sweeny J; Baber U; Mehran R; Sharma SK; Kini AS
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2018 Jul; 30(7):251-255. PubMed ID: 29656280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Early healing assessment with optical coherence tomography of everolimus-eluting stents with bioabsorbable polymer (synergy™) at 3 and 6 months after implantation.
    de la Torre Hernández JM; Tejedor P; Camarero TG; Duran JM; Lee DH; Monedero J; Laso FS; Calderón MA; Veiga G; Zueco J
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Sep; 88(3):E67-73. PubMed ID: 26526783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of acute expansion of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds versus metallic drug-eluting stents in different degrees of calcification: An Optical Coherence Tomography Study.
    Ming Fam J; van Der Sijde JN; Karanasos A; Felix C; Diletti R; van Mieghem N; de Jaegere P; Zijlstra F; Jan van Geuns R; Regar E
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Apr; 89(5):798-810. PubMed ID: 27717119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Early healing after treatment of coronary lesions by thin strut everolimus, or thicker strut biolimus eluting bioabsorbable polymer stents: The SORT-OUT VIII OCT study.
    Andreasen LN; Balleby IR; Barkholt TØ; Hebsgaard L; Terkelsen CJ; Holck EN; Jensen LO; Maeng M; Dijkstra J; Antonsen L; Kristensen SD; Tu S; Lassen JF; Christiansen EH; Holm NR
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2023 Mar; 101(4):787-797. PubMed ID: 36740229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Early coverage of drug-eluting stents analysed by optical coherence tomography: evidence of the impact of stent apposition and strut characteristics on the neointimal healing process.
    Lee R; Foin N; Ng J; Allen J; Soh N; Ang I; Shim W; Torii R; Wong P
    EuroIntervention; 2016 Aug; 12(5):e605-14. PubMed ID: 27497360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. First-in-human evaluation of a bioabsorbable polymer-coated sirolimus-eluting stent: imaging and clinical results of the DESSOLVE I Trial (DES with sirolimus and a bioabsorbable polymer for the treatment of patients with de novo lesion in the native coronary arteries).
    Ormiston J; Webster M; Stewart J; Vrolix M; Whitbourn R; Donohoe D; Knape C; Lansky A; Attizzani GF; Fitzgerald P; Kandzari DE; Wijns W
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Oct; 6(10):1026-34. PubMed ID: 24055443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Vascular response to bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent vs. permanent polymer everolimus-eluting stent at 9-month follow-up: an optical coherence tomography sub-study from the CENTURY II trial.
    Kuramitsu S; Kazuno Y; Sonoda S; Domei T; Jinnouchi H; Yamaji K; Soga Y; Shirai S; Ando K; Saito S
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jan; 17(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 26333375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intraindividual Comparison of Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds Versus Drug-Eluting Metallic Stents.
    Cassese S; Hoppmann P; Kufner S; Byrne RA; Wiebe J; Colleran R; Giacoppo D; Harada Y; Laugwitz KL; Schunkert H; Fusaro M; Kastrati A
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Aug; 9(8):. PubMed ID: 27512088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A hybrid strategy with bioresorbable vascular scaffolds and drug eluting stents for treating complex coronary lesions.
    Jabbour RJ; Ielasi A; Tanaka A; Leoncini M; Cortese B; Grigis G; Mitomo S; Regazzoli D; Di Palma G; Rapetto C; Tespili M; Colombo A; Latib A
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2017; 18(5S1):S4-S9. PubMed ID: 28314675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mechanical properties of the everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold compared to the metallic everolimus-eluting stent.
    Dalos D; Gangl C; Roth C; Krenn L; Scherzer S; Vertesich M; Lang I; Maurer G; Neunteufl T; Berger R; Delle-Karth G
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2016 May; 16():104. PubMed ID: 27225486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.