These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29901627)

  • 1. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and biopsy with 22-gauge and 25-gauge needles for the "precision medicine" of pancreatic cancer: A retrospective study.
    Yoshizawa N; Yamada R; Sakuno T; Inoue H; Miura H; Takeuchi T; Nakamura M; Hamada Y; Katsurahara M; Tanaka K; Horiki N; Takei Y
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Jun; 97(24):e11096. PubMed ID: 29901627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles.
    Yang MJ; Yim H; Hwang JC; Lee D; Kim YB; Lim SG; Kim SS; Kang JK; Yoo BM; Kim JH
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2015 Sep; 15():122. PubMed ID: 26419845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Sampling of Solid Pancreatic Lesions: A Comparative Analysis of 25 Gauge
    Siddique DA; Rahal MA; Trevino K; Wu HH; Al-Haddad MA
    Anticancer Res; 2020 Oct; 40(10):5845-5851. PubMed ID: 32988914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison between 25-gauge and 22-gauge Franseen needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of pancreatic and peripancreatic masses: a randomized non-inferiority study.
    Oh D; Kong J; Ko SW; Hong SM; So H; Hwang JS; Song TJ; Lee SK; Kim MH; Lee SS
    Endoscopy; 2021 Nov; 53(11):1122-1129. PubMed ID: 33652495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. 22-Gauge biopsy needles have a better histological diagnostic yield in the discrimination of specific pancreatic solid neoplasms.
    Jiang H; Guo J; Wang K; Zhu H; Chen J; Xu C; Wang D; Jin Z
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2019 Jan; 54(1):101-107. PubMed ID: 30731044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A prospective, randomized trial comparing 25-gauge and 22-gauge needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic masses.
    Lee JK; Lee KT; Choi ER; Jang TH; Jang KT; Lee JK; Lee KH
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jun; 48(6):752-7. PubMed ID: 23600919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing the performance of 22 gauge versus 25 gauge EUS-FNA needles in solid masses.
    Vilmann P; Săftoiu A; Hollerbach S; Skov BG; Linnemann D; Popescu CF; Wellmann A; Gorunescu F; Clementsen P; Freund U; Flemming P; Hassan H; Gheonea DI; Streba L; Ioncică AM; Streba CT
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jul; 48(7):877-83. PubMed ID: 23795663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the 22-gauge and 25-gauge needles for endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration.
    Sakaguchi T; Inoue T; Miyazawa T; Mineshita M
    Respir Investig; 2021 Mar; 59(2):235-239. PubMed ID: 33187889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of the efficiency of 22G versus 25G needles in EUS-FNA for solid pancreatic mass assessment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Guedes HG; Moura DTH; Duarte RB; Cordero MAC; Santos MELD; Cheng S; Matuguma SE; Chaves DM; Bernardo WM; Moura EGH
    Clinics (Sao Paulo); 2018; 73():e261. PubMed ID: 29451621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Randomized trial comparing the 25G and 22G Franseen needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition from solid pancreatic masses for adequate histological assessment.
    Tomoda T; Kato H; Fujii Y; Yamazaki T; Matsumoto K; Horiguchi S; Tsutsumi K; Inoue H; Tanaka T; Mitsuhashi T; Okada H
    Dig Endosc; 2022 Mar; 34(3):596-603. PubMed ID: 34245614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Factors of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition for Successful Next-Generation Sequencing in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.
    Park JK; Lee JH; Noh DH; Park JK; Lee KT; Lee JK; Lee KH; Jang KT; Cho J
    Gut Liver; 2020 May; 14(3):387-394. PubMed ID: 31581388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Randomized Trial Comparing the Flexible 19G and 25G Needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration of Solid Pancreatic Mass Lesions.
    Ramesh J; Bang JY; Hebert-Magee S; Trevino J; Eltoum I; Frost A; Hasan MK; Logue A; Hawes R; Varadarajulu S
    Pancreas; 2015 Jan; 44(1):128-33. PubMed ID: 25232713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Technical aspects of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Guideline - March 2017.
    Polkowski M; Jenssen C; Kaye P; Carrara S; Deprez P; Gines A; Fernández-Esparrach G; Eisendrath P; Aithal GP; Arcidiacono P; Barthet M; Bastos P; Fornelli A; Napoleon B; Iglesias-Garcia J; Seicean A; Larghi A; Hassan C; van Hooft JE; Dumonceau JM
    Endoscopy; 2017 Oct; 49(10):989-1006. PubMed ID: 28898917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy histology with a 22-gauge Franseen needle and fine-needle aspiration liquid-based cytology with a conventional 25-gauge needle provide comparable diagnostic accuracy in solid pancreatic lesions.
    Tomita Y; Torisu Y; Chiba M; Kinoshita Y; Akasu T; Shimamoto N; Abe T; Kanazawa K; Takakura K; Tsukinaga S; Nakano M; Toyoizumi H; Kato M; Saruta M
    JGH Open; 2021 Sep; 5(9):1092-1096. PubMed ID: 34584980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of 22-gauge standard fine needle versus core biopsy needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of suspected pancreatic cancer: a randomized crossover trial.
    Noh DH; Choi K; Gu S; Cho J; Jang KT; Woo YS; Lee KT; Lee JK; Lee KH
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2018 Jan; 53(1):94-99. PubMed ID: 29065734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and biopsy using a 22-gauge needle with side fenestration in pancreatic cystic lesions.
    Barresi L; Tarantino I; Traina M; Granata A; Curcio G; Azzopardi N; Baccarini P; Liotta R; Fornelli A; Maimone A; Jovine E; Cennamo V; Fabbri C
    Dig Liver Dis; 2014 Jan; 46(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 23916241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Needle size has only a limited effect on outcomes in EUS-guided fine needle aspiration: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Affolter KE; Schmidt RL; Matynia AP; Adler DG; Factor RE
    Dig Dis Sci; 2013 Apr; 58(4):1026-34. PubMed ID: 23086117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. 22G versus 25G biopsy needles for EUS-guided tissue sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized controlled study.
    Woo YS; Lee KH; Noh DH; Park JK; Lee KT; Lee JK; Jang KT
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2017 Dec; 52(12):1435-1441. PubMed ID: 28893106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Randomized trial comparing a side-port needle and standard needle for EUS-guided histology of pancreatic lesions.
    Ishiwatari H; Hayashi T; Kawakami H; Isayama H; Hisai H; Itoi T; Ono M; Kawakubo K; Yamamoto N; Tanaka M; Itokawa F; Oshiro H; Sonoda T; Hasegawa T;
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Oct; 84(4):670-8. PubMed ID: 26995688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. True diagnostic ability of EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration/biopsy sampling for small pancreatic lesions ≤10 mm and salvage diagnosis by pancreatic juice cytology: a multicenter study.
    Sagami R; Nakahodo J; Minami R; Yamao K; Yoshida A; Nishikiori H; Takenaka M; Mizukami K; Murakami K
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2024 Jan; 99(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 37598865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.