194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29903932)
1. Measuring PET Spatial Resolution Using a Cylinder Phantom Positioned at an Oblique Angle.
Lodge MA; Leal JP; Rahmim A; Sunderland JJ; Frey EC
J Nucl Med; 2018 Nov; 59(11):1768-1775. PubMed ID: 29903932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A practical, automated quality assurance method for measuring spatial resolution in PET.
Lodge MA; Rahmim A; Wahl RL
J Nucl Med; 2009 Aug; 50(8):1307-14. PubMed ID: 19617324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Spatial resolution improvement and dose reduction potential for inner ear CT imaging using a z-axis deconvolution technique.
McCollough CH; Leng S; Sunnegardh J; Vrieze TJ; Yu L; Lane J; Raupach R; Stierstorfer K; Flohr T
Med Phys; 2013 Jun; 40(6):061904. PubMed ID: 23718595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Isotope specific resolution recovery image reconstruction in high resolution PET imaging.
Kotasidis FA; Angelis GI; Anton-Rodriguez J; Matthews JC; Reader AJ; Zaidi H
Med Phys; 2014 May; 41(5):052503. PubMed ID: 24784400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimization of image reconstruction conditions with phantoms for brain FDG and amyloid PET imaging.
Akamatsu G; Ikari Y; Nishio T; Nishida H; Ohnishi A; Aita K; Sasaki M; Sasaki M; Senda M
Ann Nucl Med; 2016 Jan; 30(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 26337533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Automated model-based quantitative analysis of phantoms with spherical inserts in FDG PET scans.
Ulrich EJ; Sunderland JJ; Smith BJ; Mohiuddin I; Parkhurst J; Plichta KA; Buatti JM; Beichel RR
Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 45(1):258-276. PubMed ID: 29091269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Beyond 18F-FDG: Characterization of PET/CT and PET/MR Scanners for a Comprehensive Set of Positron Emitters of Growing Application--18F, 11C, 89Zr, 124I, 68Ga, and 90Y.
Soderlund AT; Chaal J; Tjio G; Totman JJ; Conti M; Townsend DW
J Nucl Med; 2015 Aug; 56(8):1285-91. PubMed ID: 26135111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [High resolution reconstruction of PET images using the iterative OSEM algorithm].
Doll J; Henze M; Bublitz O; Werling A; Adam LE; Haberkorn U; Semmler W; Brix G
Nuklearmedizin; 2004 Jun; 43(3):72-8. PubMed ID: 15201947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Using the NEMA NU 4 PET image quality phantom in multipinhole small-animal SPECT.
Harteveld AA; Meeuwis AP; Disselhorst JA; Slump CH; Oyen WJ; Boerman OC; Visser EP
J Nucl Med; 2011 Oct; 52(10):1646-53. PubMed ID: 21849403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The use of zeolites to generate PET phantoms for the validation of quantification strategies in oncology.
Zito F; De Bernardi E; Soffientini C; Canzi C; Casati R; Gerundini P; Baselli G
Med Phys; 2012 Sep; 39(9):5353-61. PubMed ID: 22957603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Optimization of basic adjustable data-acquisition parameters for continuous three-dimensional whole-body FDG-PET].
Matsumoto K; Kitamura K; Mizuta T; Shimizu K; Murase K; Senda M
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2006 Jan; 62(1):78-85. PubMed ID: 16456508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Porous phantoms for PET and SPECT performance evaluation and quality assurance.
DiFilippo FP; Price JP; Kelsch DN; Muzic RF
Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1183-94. PubMed ID: 15191308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Standardization of image reconstruction parameters for dynamic fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography.
Sharma A; Pandey AK; Mohan A; Bhalla AS; Vishnubhatla S; Sharma MC; Jain D; Thulkar S; Gupta P; Bal CS; Kumar R
Nucl Med Commun; 2018 Dec; 39(12):1207-1217. PubMed ID: 30371603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Image-quality assessment for several positron emitters using the NEMA NU 4-2008 standards in the Siemens Inveon small-animal PET scanner.
Disselhorst JA; Brom M; Laverman P; Slump CH; Boerman OC; Oyen WJ; Gotthardt M; Visser EP
J Nucl Med; 2010 Apr; 51(4):610-7. PubMed ID: 20237025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Image reconstructions from super-sampled data sets with resolution modeling in PET imaging.
Li Y; Matej S; Metzler SD
Med Phys; 2014 Dec; 41(12):121912. PubMed ID: 25471972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Advanced quantitative evaluation of PET systems using the ACR phantom and NiftyPET software.
Markiewicz PJ; da Costa-Luis C; Dickson J; Barnes A; Krokos G; MacKewn J; Clark T; Wimberley C; MacNaught G; Yaqub MM; Gispert JD; Hutton BF; Marsden P; Hammers A; Reader AJ; Ourselin S; Herholz K; Matthews JC; Barkhof F
Med Phys; 2022 May; 49(5):3298-3313. PubMed ID: 35271742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Iodine-124 PET dosimetry in differentiated thyroid cancer: recovery coefficient in 2D and 3D modes for PET(/CT) systems.
Jentzen W; Weise R; Kupferschläger J; Freudenberg L; Brandau W; Bares R; Burchert W; Bockisch A
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2008 Mar; 35(3):611-23. PubMed ID: 17929014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Simultaneous measurement of noise and spatial resolution in PET phantom images.
Lodge MA; Rahmim A; Wahl RL
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Feb; 55(4):1069-81. PubMed ID: 20107244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance evaluation of a high-resolution brain PET scanner using four-layer MPPC DOI detectors.
Watanabe M; Saito A; Isobe T; Ote K; Yamada R; Moriya T; Omura T
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Aug; 62(17):7148-7166. PubMed ID: 28753133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantification of FDG PET studies using standardised uptake values in multi-centre trials: effects of image reconstruction, resolution and ROI definition parameters.
Westerterp M; Pruim J; Oyen W; Hoekstra O; Paans A; Visser E; van Lanschot J; Sloof G; Boellaard R
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2007 Mar; 34(3):392-404. PubMed ID: 17033848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
