These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29905632)

  • 61. Shared decision-making in primary care: tailoring the Charles et al. model to fit the context of general practice.
    Murray E; Charles C; Gafni A
    Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Aug; 62(2):205-11. PubMed ID: 16139467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. The paradox of paternalism and three steps careproviders can take to help all patients.
    Howe EG
    J Clin Ethics; 2002; 13(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 12235680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. End-of-life decisions in Hungarian intensive care units.
    Zubek L; Szabó L; Diószeghy C; Gál J; Elö G
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 2011 Jan; 39(1):116-21. PubMed ID: 21375101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Concepts of health, ethics, and communication in shared decision making.
    Kaldjian LC
    Commun Med; 2017; 14(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 29957899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Shared decision-making: nurses must respect autonomy over paternalism.
    Grffith R; Tengnah C
    Br J Community Nurs; 2013 Jun; 18(6):303-6. PubMed ID: 24046930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Decisional autonomy undermines advisees' judgments of experts in medicine and in life.
    Kassirer S; Levine EE; Gaertig C
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 May; 117(21):11368-11378. PubMed ID: 32381738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Patients' wants versus patients' interests.
    Wilson J
    J Med Ethics; 1986 Sep; 12(3):127-32. PubMed ID: 3761332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Making sense of medical paternalism.
    Hanson R
    Med Hypotheses; 2008; 70(5):910-3. PubMed ID: 17959323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. The Engaged Patient: The Relevance of Patient-Physician Communication for Twenty-First-Century Health.
    Timmermans S
    J Health Soc Behav; 2020 Sep; 61(3):259-273. PubMed ID: 32723112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. New perspectives on substituted relational autonomy for shared decision-making in critical care.
    Grignoli N; Di Bernardo V; Malacrida R
    Crit Care; 2018 Oct; 22(1):260. PubMed ID: 30309384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. A defence of medical paternalism: maximising patients' autonomy.
    Komrad MS
    J Med Ethics; 1983 Mar; 9(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 6834402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. The ethics of responsibility and ownership in decision-making about treatment for breast cancer: triangulation of consultation with patient and surgeon perspectives.
    Mendick N; Young B; Holcombe C; Salmon P
    Soc Sci Med; 2010 Jun; 70(12):1904-1911. PubMed ID: 20382463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Ethical decision making and patient autonomy: a comparison of physicians and patients in Japan and the United States.
    Ruhnke GW; Wilson SR; Akamatsu T; Kinoue T; Takashima Y; Goldstein MK; Koenig BA; Hornberger JC; Raffin TA
    Chest; 2000 Oct; 118(4):1172-82. PubMed ID: 11035693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Not Taking "Yes" for an Answer.
    Capron AM
    J Clin Ethics; 2015; 26(2):104-7. PubMed ID: 26132056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. When open-ended questions don't work: the role of palliative paternalism in difficult medical decisions.
    Roeland E; Cain J; Onderdonk C; Kerr K; Mitchell W; Thornberry K
    J Palliat Med; 2014 Apr; 17(4):415-20. PubMed ID: 24588626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Who decides--the patient, the physician or the rabbi?
    Glick SM
    Assia Jew Med Ethics; 2004 Sep; 4(2):20-30. PubMed ID: 15573424
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. 2015 ISSLS Presidential Address: From paternalism to shared decision making: and back?
    Gunzburg R
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 May; 41(10):827-31. PubMed ID: 26274531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Montgomery on informed consent: an inexpert decision?
    Montgomery J; Montgomery E
    J Med Ethics; 2016 Feb; 42(2):89-94. PubMed ID: 26811487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Characteristics of physicians with participatory decision-making styles.
    Kaplan SH; Greenfield S; Gandek B; Rogers WH; Ware JE
    Ann Intern Med; 1996 Mar; 124(5):497-504. PubMed ID: 8602709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. The parents' perspective: ethical decision-making in neonatal intensive care.
    Pinch WJ; Spielman ML
    J Adv Nurs; 1990 Jun; 15(6):712-9. PubMed ID: 2365911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.