BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

400 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29905670)

  • 1. Behavioral Measures of Listening Effort in School-Age Children: Examining the Effects of Signal-to-Noise Ratio, Hearing Loss, and Amplification.
    McGarrigle R; Gustafson SJ; Hornsby BWY; Bess FH
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(2):381-392. PubMed ID: 29905670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of hearing aid use on listening effort and mental fatigue associated with sustained speech processing demands.
    Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):523-34. PubMed ID: 23426091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):e52-64. PubMed ID: 23416751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of changing the secondary task in dual-task paradigms for measuring listening effort.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):611-22. PubMed ID: 24992491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Listening Effort Through Depth of Processing in School-Age Children.
    Hsu BC; Vanpoucke F; van Wieringen A
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):568-576. PubMed ID: 28399062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measuring listening effort: driving simulator versus simple dual-task paradigm.
    Wu YH; Aksan N; Rizzo M; Stangl E; Zhang X; Bentler R
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):623-32. PubMed ID: 25083599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Psychometric Functions of Dual-Task Paradigms for Measuring Listening Effort.
    Wu YH; Stangl E; Zhang X; Perkins J; Eilers E
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):660-670. PubMed ID: 27438866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sentence recognition in noise and perceived benefit of noise reduction on the receiver and transmitter sides of a BICROS hearing aid.
    Oeding K; Valente M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(10):980-91. PubMed ID: 24384083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech Perception in Noise and Listening Effort of Older Adults With Nonlinear Frequency Compression Hearing Aids.
    Shehorn J; Marrone N; Muller T
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):215-225. PubMed ID: 28806193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Listening Effort in Native and Nonnative English-Speaking Children Using Low Linguistic Single- and Dual-Task Paradigms.
    Oosthuizen I; Picou EM; Pottas L; Myburgh HC; Swanepoel W
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Jun; 63(6):1979-1989. PubMed ID: 32479740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Do hearing loss and cognitive function modulate benefit from different binaural noise-reduction settings?
    Neher T; Grimm G; Hohmann V; Kollmeier B
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):e52-62. PubMed ID: 24351610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Novel sounds as a psychophysiological measure of listening effort in older listeners with and without hearing loss.
    Bertoli S; Bodmer D
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2014 May; 125(5):1030-41. PubMed ID: 24216383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Potential benefits and limitations of three types of directional processing in hearing aids.
    Picou EM; Aspell E; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):339-52. PubMed ID: 24518429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How directional microphones affect speech recognition, listening effort and localisation for listeners with moderate-to-severe hearing loss.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Dec; 56(12):909-918. PubMed ID: 28738747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perceptual consequences of different signal changes due to binaural noise reduction: do hearing loss and working memory capacity play a role?
    Neher T; Grimm G; Hohmann V
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(5):e213-27. PubMed ID: 25010636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of hearing aid noise reduction on listening effort in hearing-impaired adults.
    Desjardins JL; Doherty KA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):600-10. PubMed ID: 24622352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Children's speech recognition in noise using omni-directional and dual-microphone hearing aid technology.
    Gravel JS; Fausel N; Liskow C; Chobot J
    Ear Hear; 1999 Feb; 20(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 10037061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech Perception in Classroom Acoustics by Children With Hearing Loss and Wearing Hearing Aids.
    Iglehart F
    Am J Audiol; 2020 Mar; 29(1):6-17. PubMed ID: 31835909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Listening Effort and Speech Recognition with Frequency Compression Amplification for Children and Adults with Hearing Loss.
    Brennan MA; Lewis D; McCreery R; Kopun J; Alexander JM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Oct; 28(9):823-837. PubMed ID: 28972471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Effects of Noise and Reverberation on Listening Effort in Adults With Normal Hearing.
    Picou EM; Gordon J; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 26372266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.