272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29906605)
1. When did anoles diverge? An analysis of multiple dating strategies.
Román-Palacios C; Tavera J; Castañeda MDR
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2018 Oct; 127():655-668. PubMed ID: 29906605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Phylogenetic relationships of Amazonian anole lizards (Dactyloa): taxonomic implications, new insights about phenotypic evolution and the timing of diversification.
Prates I; Rodrigues MT; Melo-Sampaio PR; Carnaval AC
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2015 Jan; 82 Pt A():258-68. PubMed ID: 25451806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Molecular clocks and geological dates: cytochrome b of Anolis extremus substantially contradicts dating of Barbados emergence.
Thorpe RS; Leadbeater DL; Pook CE
Mol Ecol; 2005 Jun; 14(7):2087-96. PubMed ID: 15910329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Estimating divergence dates and evaluating dating methods using phylogenomic and mitochondrial data in squamate reptiles.
Mulcahy DG; Noonan BP; Moss T; Townsend TM; Reeder TW; Sites JW; Wiens JJ
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2012 Dec; 65(3):974-91. PubMed ID: 22982760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Methods for the quantitative comparison of molecular estimates of clade age and the fossil record.
Clarke JA; Boyd CA
Syst Biol; 2015 Jan; 64(1):25-41. PubMed ID: 25281846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Divergence times and colonization of the Canary Islands by Gallotia lizards.
Cox SC; Carranza S; Brown RP
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2010 Aug; 56(2):747-57. PubMed ID: 20307675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Origins and biogeography of the Anolis crassulus subgroup (Squamata: Dactyloidae) in the highlands of Nuclear Central America.
Hofmann EP; Townsend JH
BMC Evol Biol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):267. PubMed ID: 29268694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Myrteae phylogeny, calibration, biogeography and diversification patterns: Increased understanding in the most species rich tribe of Myrtaceae.
Vasconcelos TNC; Proença CEB; Ahmad B; Aguilar DS; Aguilar R; Amorim BS; Campbell K; Costa IR; De-Carvalho PS; Faria JEQ; Giaretta A; Kooij PW; Lima DF; Mazine FF; Peguero B; Prenner G; Santos MF; Soewarto J; Wingler A; Lucas EJ
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2017 Apr; 109():113-137. PubMed ID: 28069533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An evaluation of fossil tip-dating versus node-age calibrations in tetraodontiform fishes (Teleostei: Percomorphaceae).
Arcila D; Alexander Pyron R; Tyler JC; Ortí G; Betancur-R R
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2015 Jan; 82 Pt A():131-45. PubMed ID: 25462998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluating fossil calibrations for dating phylogenies in light of rates of molecular evolution: a comparison of three approaches.
Lukoschek V; Scott Keogh J; Avise JC
Syst Biol; 2012 Jan; 61(1):22-43. PubMed ID: 21840843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Out of Cuba: overwater dispersal and speciation among lizards in the Anolis carolinensis subgroup.
Glor RE; Losos JB; Larson A
Mol Ecol; 2005 Jul; 14(8):2419-32. PubMed ID: 15969724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fossil calibrations and molecular divergence time estimates in centrarchid fishes (Teleostei: Centrarchidae).
Near TJ; Bolnick DI; Wainwright PC
Evolution; 2005 Aug; 59(8):1768-82. PubMed ID: 16329246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of different strategies for using fossil calibrations to generate the time prior in Bayesian molecular clock dating.
Barba-Montoya J; Dos Reis M; Yang Z
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2017 Sep; 114():386-400. PubMed ID: 28709986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Angiosperm divergence times: the effect of genes, codon positions, and time constraints.
Magallón SA; Sanderson MJ
Evolution; 2005 Aug; 59(8):1653-70. PubMed ID: 16329238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Integration of Bayesian molecular clock methods and fossil-based soft bounds reveals early Cenozoic origin of African lacertid lizards.
Hipsley CA; Himmelmann L; Metzler D; Müller J
BMC Evol Biol; 2009 Jul; 9():151. PubMed ID: 19570207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Empirical and Bayesian approaches to fossil-only divergence times: A study across three reptile clades.
Turner AH; Pritchard AC; Matzke NJ
PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0169885. PubMed ID: 28187191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Using more than the oldest fossils: dating osmundaceae with three Bayesian clock approaches.
Grimm GW; Kapli P; Bomfleur B; McLoughlin S; Renner SS
Syst Biol; 2015 May; 64(3):396-405. PubMed ID: 25503771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Testing the impact of calibration on molecular divergence times using a fossil-rich group: the case of Nothofagus (Fagales).
Sauquet H; Ho SY; Gandolfo MA; Jordan GJ; Wilf P; Cantrill DJ; Bayly MJ; Bromham L; Brown GK; Carpenter RJ; Lee DM; Murphy DJ; Sniderman JM; Udovicic F
Syst Biol; 2012 Mar; 61(2):289-313. PubMed ID: 22201158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. DaTeR: error-correcting phylogenetic chronograms using relative time constraints.
Mondal A; Rangel LT; Payette JG; Fournier GP; Bansal MS
Bioinformatics; 2023 Feb; 39(2):. PubMed ID: 36752504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Divergence times in demosponges (Porifera): first insights from new mitogenomes and the inclusion of fossils in a birth-death clock model.
Schuster A; Vargas S; Knapp IS; Pomponi SA; Toonen RJ; Erpenbeck D; Wörheide G
BMC Evol Biol; 2018 Jul; 18(1):114. PubMed ID: 30021516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
