275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29906634)
1. Whole head quantitative susceptibility mapping using a least-norm direct dipole inversion method.
Sun H; Ma Y; MacDonald ME; Pike GB
Neuroimage; 2018 Oct; 179():166-175. PubMed ID: 29906634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Background field removal using a region adaptive kernel for quantitative susceptibility mapping of human brain.
Fang J; Bao L; Li X; van Zijl PCM; Chen Z
J Magn Reson; 2017 Aug; 281():130-140. PubMed ID: 28595120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preconditioned total field inversion (TFI) method for quantitative susceptibility mapping.
Liu Z; Kee Y; Zhou D; Wang Y; Spincemaille P
Magn Reson Med; 2017 Jul; 78(1):303-315. PubMed ID: 27464893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Background field removal technique using regularization enabled sophisticated harmonic artifact reduction for phase data with varying kernel sizes.
Kan H; Kasai H; Arai N; Kunitomo H; Hirose Y; Shibamoto Y
Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Sep; 34(7):1026-33. PubMed ID: 27114339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Rapid reconstruction of quantitative susceptibility mapping via improved ℓ
Cai C; Chen X; Liu W; Cai S; Zeng D; Ding X
Comput Biol Med; 2016 Dec; 79():59-67. PubMed ID: 27744181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Deep grey matter quantitative susceptibility mapping from small spatial coverages using deep learning.
Zhu X; Gao Y; Liu F; Crozier S; Sun H
Z Med Phys; 2022 May; 32(2):188-198. PubMed ID: 34312047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multiecho complex total field inversion method (mcTFI) for improved signal modeling in quantitative susceptibility mapping.
Wen Y; Spincemaille P; Nguyen T; Cho J; Kovanlikaya I; Anderson J; Wu G; Yang B; Fung M; Li K; Kelley D; Benhamo N; Wang Y
Magn Reson Med; 2021 Oct; 86(4):2165-2178. PubMed ID: 34028868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Investigating the effect of oblique image acquisition on the accuracy of QSM and a robust tilt correction method.
Kiersnowski OC; Karsa A; Wastling SJ; Thornton JS; Shmueli K
Magn Reson Med; 2023 May; 89(5):1791-1808. PubMed ID: 36480002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative susceptibility mapping using deep neural network: QSMnet.
Yoon J; Gong E; Chatnuntawech I; Bilgic B; Lee J; Jung W; Ko J; Jung H; Setsompop K; Zaharchuk G; Kim EY; Pauly J; Lee J
Neuroimage; 2018 Oct; 179():199-206. PubMed ID: 29894829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Weak-harmonic regularization for quantitative susceptibility mapping.
Milovic C; Bilgic B; Zhao B; Langkammer C; Tejos C; Acosta-Cabronero J
Magn Reson Med; 2019 Feb; 81(2):1399-1411. PubMed ID: 30265767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. QSMART: Quantitative susceptibility mapping artifact reduction technique.
Yaghmaie N; Syeda WT; Wu C; Zhang Y; Zhang TD; Burrows EL; Brodtmann A; Moffat BA; Wright DK; Glarin R; Kolbe S; Johnston LA
Neuroimage; 2021 May; 231():117701. PubMed ID: 33484853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fast quantitative susceptibility mapping using 3D EPI and total generalized variation.
Langkammer C; Bredies K; Poser BA; Barth M; Reishofer G; Fan AP; Bilgic B; Fazekas F; Mainero C; Ropele S
Neuroimage; 2015 May; 111():622-30. PubMed ID: 25731991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Single-step calculation of susceptibility through multiple orientation sampling.
Chen L; Cai S; van Zijl PCM; Li X
NMR Biomed; 2021 Jul; 34(7):e4517. PubMed ID: 33822416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Rapid two-step dipole inversion for susceptibility mapping with sparsity priors.
Kames C; Wiggermann V; Rauscher A
Neuroimage; 2018 Feb; 167():276-283. PubMed ID: 29138089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantitative susceptibility map reconstruction using annihilating filter-based low-rank Hankel matrix approach.
Ahn HS; Park SH; Ye JC
Magn Reson Med; 2020 Mar; 83(3):858-871. PubMed ID: 31468595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Plug-and-Play latent feature editing for orientation-adaptive quantitative susceptibility mapping neural networks.
Gao Y; Xiong Z; Shan S; Liu Y; Rong P; Li M; Wilman AH; Pike GB; Liu F; Sun H
Med Image Anal; 2024 May; 94():103160. PubMed ID: 38552528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A modulated closed form solution for quantitative susceptibility mapping--a thorough evaluation and comparison to iterative methods based on edge prior knowledge.
Khabipova D; Wiaux Y; Gruetter R; Marques JP
Neuroimage; 2015 Feb; 107():163-174. PubMed ID: 25463463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of quantitative susceptibility mapping methods on evaluating radiation-induced cerebral microbleeds and basal ganglia at 3T and 7T.
Chen Y; Genc O; Poynton CB; Banerjee S; Hess CP; Lupo JM
NMR Biomed; 2022 May; 35(5):e4666. PubMed ID: 35075701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping (QSM) Algorithms: Mathematical Rationale and Computational Implementations.
Kee Y; Liu Z; Zhou L; Dimov A; Cho J; de Rochefort L; Seo JK; Wang Y
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2017 Nov; 64(11):2531-2545. PubMed ID: 28885147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Noise Effects in Various Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping Methods.
Wang S; Liu T; Chen W; Spincemaille P; Wisnieff C; Tsiouris AJ; Zhu W; Pan C; Zhao L; Wang Y
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2013 Dec; 60(12):3441-8. PubMed ID: 23751950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
