275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29906634)
21. Multi-echo dipole inversion for magnetic susceptibility mapping.
Kames C; Doucette J; Rauscher A
Magn Reson Med; 2023 Jun; 89(6):2391-2401. PubMed ID: 36695283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of quantitative susceptibility mapping methods for iron-sensitive susceptibility imaging at 7T: An evaluation in healthy subjects and patients with Huntington's disease.
Yao J; Morrison MA; Jakary A; Avadiappan S; Chen Y; Luitjens J; Glueck J; Driscoll T; Geschwind MD; Nelson AB; Villanueva-Meyer JE; Hess CP; Lupo JM
Neuroimage; 2023 Jan; 265():119788. PubMed ID: 36476567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Quantitative susceptibility mapping using a superposed dipole inversion method: Application to intracranial hemorrhage.
Sun H; Kate M; Gioia LC; Emery DJ; Butcher K; Wilman AH
Magn Reson Med; 2016 Sep; 76(3):781-91. PubMed ID: 26414757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping Using the Multiple Dipole-inversion Combination with k-space Segmentation Method.
Sato R; Shirai T; Taniguchi Y; Murase T; Bito Y; Ochi H
Magn Reson Med Sci; 2017 Oct; 16(4):340-350. PubMed ID: 28367904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Fast quantitative susceptibility reconstruction via total field inversion with improved weighted L
Zhang L; Chen X; Lin J; Ding X; Bao L; Cai C; Li J; Chen Z; Cai S
NMR Biomed; 2019 May; 32(5):e4067. PubMed ID: 30811722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Maximum spherical mean value filtering for whole-brain QSM.
Roberts AG; Romano DJ; Şişman M; Dimov AV; Nguyen TD; Kovanlikaya I; Gauthier SA; Wang Y; Spincemaille P
Magn Reson Med; 2024 Apr; 91(4):1586-1597. PubMed ID: 38169132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. MRI estimates of brain iron concentration in normal aging using quantitative susceptibility mapping.
Bilgic B; Pfefferbaum A; Rohlfing T; Sullivan EV; Adalsteinsson E
Neuroimage; 2012 Feb; 59(3):2625-35. PubMed ID: 21925274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Hybrid data fidelity term approach for quantitative susceptibility mapping.
Lambert M; Tejos C; Langkammer C; Milovic C
Magn Reson Med; 2022 Aug; 88(2):962-972. PubMed ID: 35435267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Morphology-adaptive total variation for the reconstruction of quantitative susceptibility map from the magnetic resonance imaging phase.
Guo L; Mei Y; Guan J; Tan X; Xu Y; Chen W; Feng Q; Feng Y
PLoS One; 2018; 13(5):e0196922. PubMed ID: 29738526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Single-step quantitative susceptibility mapping with variational penalties.
Chatnuntawech I; McDaniel P; Cauley SF; Gagoski BA; Langkammer C; Martin A; Grant PE; Wald LL; Setsompop K; Adalsteinsson E; Bilgic B
NMR Biomed; 2017 Apr; 30(4):. PubMed ID: 27332141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Background field removal technique based on non-regularized variable kernels sophisticated harmonic artifact reduction for phase data for quantitative susceptibility mapping.
Kan H; Arai N; Takizawa M; Omori K; Kasai H; Kunitomo H; Hirose Y; Shibamoto Y
Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Oct; 52():94-101. PubMed ID: 29902566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. DeepQSM - using deep learning to solve the dipole inversion for quantitative susceptibility mapping.
Bollmann S; Rasmussen KGB; Kristensen M; Blendal RG; Østergaard LR; Plocharski M; O'Brien K; Langkammer C; Janke A; Barth M
Neuroimage; 2019 Jul; 195():373-383. PubMed ID: 30935908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Instant tissue field and magnetic susceptibility mapping from MRI raw phase using Laplacian enhanced deep neural networks.
Gao Y; Xiong Z; Fazlollahi A; Nestor PJ; Vegh V; Nasrallah F; Winter C; Pike GB; Crozier S; Liu F; Sun H
Neuroimage; 2022 Oct; 259():119410. PubMed ID: 35753595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Motion artifacts in standard clinical setting obscure disease-specific differences in quantitative susceptibility mapping.
Meineke J; Wenzel F; De Marco M; Venneri A; Blackburn DJ; Teh K; Wilkinson ID; Katscher U
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jul; 63(14):14NT01. PubMed ID: 29897342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Overview of quantitative susceptibility mapping using deep learning: Current status, challenges and opportunities.
Jung W; Bollmann S; Lee J
NMR Biomed; 2022 Apr; 35(4):e4292. PubMed ID: 32207195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. QSMxT: Robust masking and artifact reduction for quantitative susceptibility mapping.
Stewart AW; Robinson SD; O'Brien K; Jin J; Widhalm G; Hangel G; Walls A; Goodwin J; Eckstein K; Tourell M; Morgan C; Narayanan A; Barth M; Bollmann S
Magn Reson Med; 2022 Mar; 87(3):1289-1300. PubMed ID: 34687073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. MoDL-QSM: Model-based deep learning for quantitative susceptibility mapping.
Feng R; Zhao J; Wang H; Yang B; Feng J; Shi Y; Zhang M; Liu C; Zhang Y; Zhuang J; Wei H
Neuroimage; 2021 Oct; 240():118376. PubMed ID: 34246768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. QSMGAN: Improved Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping using 3D Generative Adversarial Networks with increased receptive field.
Chen Y; Jakary A; Avadiappan S; Hess CP; Lupo JM
Neuroimage; 2020 Feb; 207():116389. PubMed ID: 31760151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Region Expansion of Background Field Removal with Local Spherical Harmonics Approximation for Whole-brain Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping.
Shirai T; Sato R; Kawata Y; Bito Y; Ochi H
Magn Reson Med Sci; 2023 Oct; 22(4):497-514. PubMed ID: 36372397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Robust breast quantitative susceptibility mapping in the presence of silicone.
Böhm C; Stelter JK; Weiss K; Meineke J; Komenda A; Borde T; Makowski MR; Fallenberg EM; Karampinos DC
Magn Reson Med; 2023 Sep; 90(3):1209-1218. PubMed ID: 37125658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
