412 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29906639)
1. Development of a machine-learning model to predict Gibbs free energy of binding for protein-ligand complexes.
Bitencourt-Ferreira G; de Azevedo WF
Biophys Chem; 2018 Sep; 240():63-69. PubMed ID: 29906639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Machine Learning-Based Scoring Functions, Development and Applications with SAnDReS.
Bitencourt-Ferreira G; Rizzotto C; de Azevedo Junior WF
Curr Med Chem; 2021; 28(9):1746-1756. PubMed ID: 32410551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. SAnDReS a Computational Tool for Statistical Analysis of Docking Results and Development of Scoring Functions.
Xavier MM; Heck GS; Avila MB; Levin NMB; Pintro VO; Carvalho NL; Azevedo WF
Comb Chem High Throughput Screen; 2016; 19(10):801-812. PubMed ID: 27686428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Supervised machine learning techniques to predict binding affinity. A study for cyclin-dependent kinase 2.
de Ávila MB; Xavier MM; Pintro VO; de Azevedo WF
Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2017 Dec; 494(1-2):305-310. PubMed ID: 29017921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Impact of Crystallographic Data for the Development of Machine Learning Models to Predict Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity.
Veit-Acosta M; de Azevedo Junior WF
Curr Med Chem; 2021 Oct; 28(34):7006-7022. PubMed ID: 33568025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Machine Learning to Predict Binding Affinity.
Bitencourt-Ferreira G; de Azevedo WF
Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 2053():251-273. PubMed ID: 31452110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Development of CDK-targeted scoring functions for prediction of binding affinity.
Levin NMB; Pintro VO; Bitencourt-Ferreira G; de Mattos BB; de Castro Silvério A; de Azevedo WF
Biophys Chem; 2018 Apr; 235():1-8. PubMed ID: 29407904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optimized Virtual Screening Workflow: Towards Target-Based Polynomial Scoring Functions for HIV-1 Protease.
Pintro VO; de Azevedo WF
Comb Chem High Throughput Screen; 2017; 20(9):820-827. PubMed ID: 29165067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Taba: A Tool to Analyze the Binding Affinity.
da Silva AD; Bitencourt-Ferreira G; de Azevedo WF
J Comput Chem; 2020 Jan; 41(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 31410856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Machine learning in computational docking.
Khamis MA; Gomaa W; Ahmed WF
Artif Intell Med; 2015 Mar; 63(3):135-52. PubMed ID: 25724101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Application of Machine Learning Techniques to Predict Binding Affinity for Drug Targets: A Study of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 2.
Bitencourt-Ferreira G; Duarte da Silva A; Filgueira de Azevedo W
Curr Med Chem; 2021; 28(2):253-265. PubMed ID: 31729287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rescoring of docking poses under Occam's Razor: are there simpler solutions?
Zhenin M; Bahia MS; Marcou G; Varnek A; Senderowitz H; Horvath D
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Sep; 32(9):877-888. PubMed ID: 30173397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Computationally predicting binding affinity in protein-ligand complexes: free energy-based simulations and machine learning-based scoring functions.
Wang DD; Zhu M; Yan H
Brief Bioinform; 2021 May; 22(3):. PubMed ID: 32591817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Task-Specific Scoring Functions for Predicting Ligand Binding Poses and Affinity and for Screening Enrichment.
Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Jan; 58(1):119-133. PubMed ID: 29190087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Beware of machine learning-based scoring functions-on the danger of developing black boxes.
Gabel J; Desaphy J; Rognan D
J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2807-15. PubMed ID: 25207678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computational Prediction of Binding Affinity for CDK2-ligand Complexes. A Protein Target for Cancer Drug Discovery.
Veit-Acosta M; de Azevedo Junior WF
Curr Med Chem; 2022; 29(14):2438-2455. PubMed ID: 34365938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A D3R prospective evaluation of machine learning for protein-ligand scoring.
Sunseri J; Ragoza M; Collins J; Koes DR
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):761-771. PubMed ID: 27592011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predicting binding poses and affinities for protein - ligand complexes in the 2015 D3R Grand Challenge using a physical model with a statistical parameter estimation.
Grudinin S; Kadukova M; Eisenbarth A; Marillet S; Cazals F
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):791-804. PubMed ID: 27718029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Empirical Scoring Functions for Affinity Prediction of Protein-ligand Complexes.
Pason LP; Sotriffer CA
Mol Inform; 2016 Dec; 35(11-12):541-548. PubMed ID: 27870243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Incorporating Explicit Water Molecules and Ligand Conformation Stability in Machine-Learning Scoring Functions.
Lu J; Hou X; Wang C; Zhang Y
J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Nov; 59(11):4540-4549. PubMed ID: 31638801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
