279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29907097)
1. Taxonomy-aware feature engineering for microbiome classification.
Oudah M; Henschel A
BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Jun; 19(1):227. PubMed ID: 29907097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Phylogeny-Aware Analysis of Metagenome Community Ecology Based on Matched Reference Genomes while Bypassing Taxonomy.
Zhu Q; Huang S; Gonzalez A; McGrath I; McDonald D; Haiminen N; Armstrong G; Vázquez-Baeza Y; Yu J; Kuczynski J; Sepich-Poore GD; Swafford AD; Das P; Shaffer JP; Lejzerowicz F; Belda-Ferre P; Havulinna AS; Méric G; Niiranen T; Lahti L; Salomaa V; Kim HC; Jain M; Inouye M; Gilbert JA; Knight R
mSystems; 2022 Apr; 7(2):e0016722. PubMed ID: 35369727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. DectICO: an alignment-free supervised metagenomic classification method based on feature extraction and dynamic selection.
Ding X; Cheng F; Cao C; Sun X
BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Oct; 16():323. PubMed ID: 26446672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Re-purposing software for functional characterization of the microbiome.
Gardiner LJ; Haiminen N; Utro F; Parida L; Seabolt E; Krishna R; Kaufman JH
Microbiome; 2021 Jan; 9(1):4. PubMed ID: 33422152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Phy-PMRFI: Phylogeny-Aware Prediction of Metagenomic Functions Using Random Forest Feature Importance.
Wassan JT; Wang H; Browne F; Zheng H
IEEE Trans Nanobioscience; 2019 Jul; 18(3):273-282. PubMed ID: 31021803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ecologically informed microbial biomarkers and accurate classification of mixed and unmixed samples in an extensive cross-study of human body sites.
Tackmann J; Arora N; Schmidt TSB; Rodrigues JFM; von Mering C
Microbiome; 2018 Oct; 6(1):192. PubMed ID: 30355348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Gene-based microbiome representation enhances host phenotype classification.
Deschênes T; Tohoundjona FWE; Plante PL; Di Marzo V; Raymond F
mSystems; 2023 Aug; 8(4):e0053123. PubMed ID: 37404032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Phylogenetic approaches to microbial community classification.
Ning J; Beiko RG
Microbiome; 2015 Oct; 3():47. PubMed ID: 26437943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Phylogeny-based classification of microbial communities.
Tanaseichuk O; Borneman J; Jiang T
Bioinformatics; 2014 Feb; 30(4):449-56. PubMed ID: 24369151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Different next generation sequencing platforms produce different microbial profiles and diversity in cystic fibrosis sputum.
Hahn A; Sanyal A; Perez GF; Colberg-Poley AM; Campos J; Rose MC; Pérez-Losada M
J Microbiol Methods; 2016 Nov; 130():95-99. PubMed ID: 27609714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Microbial malaise: how can we classify the microbiome?
Beiko RG
Trends Microbiol; 2015 Nov; 23(11):671-679. PubMed ID: 26439295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Consistent metagenomic biomarker detection via robust PCA.
Alshawaqfeh M; Bashaireh A; Serpedin E; Suchodolski J
Biol Direct; 2017 Jan; 12(1):4. PubMed ID: 28143486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Explaining diversity in metagenomic datasets by phylogenetic-based feature weighting.
Albanese D; De Filippo C; Cavalieri D; Donati C
PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 Mar; 11(3):e1004186. PubMed ID: 25815895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Metagenomic analysis of the Rhinopithecus bieti fecal microbiome reveals a broad diversity of bacterial and glycoside hydrolase profiles related to lignocellulose degradation.
Xu B; Xu W; Li J; Dai L; Xiong C; Tang X; Yang Y; Mu Y; Zhou J; Ding J; Wu Q; Huang Z
BMC Genomics; 2015 Mar; 16(1):174. PubMed ID: 25887697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Machine learning methods for microbiome studies.
Namkung J
J Microbiol; 2020 Mar; 58(3):206-216. PubMed ID: 32108316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A powerful microbiome-based association test and a microbial taxa discovery framework for comprehensive association mapping.
Koh H; Blaser MJ; Li H
Microbiome; 2017 Apr; 5(1):45. PubMed ID: 28438217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Massive metagenomic data analysis using abundance-based machine learning.
Harris ZN; Dhungel E; Mosior M; Ahn TH
Biol Direct; 2019 Aug; 14(1):12. PubMed ID: 31370905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Systematic evaluation of supervised machine learning for sample origin prediction using metagenomic sequencing data.
Chen JC; Tyler AD
Biol Direct; 2020 Dec; 15(1):29. PubMed ID: 33302990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Supervised classification of human microbiota.
Knights D; Costello EK; Knight R
FEMS Microbiol Rev; 2011 Mar; 35(2):343-59. PubMed ID: 21039646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimizing taxonomic classification of marker-gene amplicon sequences with QIIME 2's q2-feature-classifier plugin.
Bokulich NA; Kaehler BD; Rideout JR; Dillon M; Bolyen E; Knight R; Huttley GA; Gregory Caporaso J
Microbiome; 2018 May; 6(1):90. PubMed ID: 29773078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
