These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

309 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29907112)

  • 1. A systematic review of stakeholder views of selection methods for medical schools admission.
    Kelly ME; Patterson F; O'Flynn S; Mulligan J; Murphy AW
    BMC Med Educ; 2018 Jun; 18(1):139. PubMed ID: 29907112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How effective are selection methods in medical education? A systematic review.
    Patterson F; Knight A; Dowell J; Nicholson S; Cousans F; Cleland J
    Med Educ; 2016 Jan; 50(1):36-60. PubMed ID: 26695465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Only the best: medical student selection in Australia.
    Wilson IG; Roberts C; Flynn EM; Griffin B
    Med J Aust; 2012 Mar; 196(5):357. PubMed ID: 22432678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multiple mini interviews: revealing similarities across institutions.
    Griffin B; Auton J; Duvivier R; Shulruf B; Hu W
    BMC Med Educ; 2018 Aug; 18(1):190. PubMed ID: 30081893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. UKCAT and medical student selection in the UK - what has changed since 2006?
    Greatrix R; Dowell J
    BMC Med Educ; 2020 Sep; 20(1):292. PubMed ID: 32891164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A meta-analytic perspective on the valid use of subjective human judgement to make medical school admission decisions.
    Kreiter C; O'Shea M; Bruen C; Murphy P; Pawlikowska T
    Med Educ Online; 2018 Dec; 23(1):1522225. PubMed ID: 30286694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Situational judgement tests in medical education and training: Research, theory and practice: AMEE Guide No. 100.
    Patterson F; Zibarras L; Ashworth V
    Med Teach; 2016; 38(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 26313700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multiple mini-interviews versus traditional interviews: stakeholder acceptability comparison.
    Razack S; Faremo S; Drolet F; Snell L; Wiseman J; Pickering J
    Med Educ; 2009 Oct; 43(10):993-1000. PubMed ID: 19769649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The construct validity of HPAT-Ireland for the selection of medical students: unresolved issues and future research implications.
    Kelly ME; O'Flynn S
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2017 May; 22(2):267-286. PubMed ID: 27817087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Selecting top candidates for medical school selection interviews- a non-compensatory approach.
    Shulruf B; O'Sullivan A; Velan G
    BMC Med Educ; 2020 Apr; 20(1):113. PubMed ID: 32295582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluations of situational judgement tests to assess non-academic attributes in selection.
    Patterson F; Ashworth V; Zibarras L; Coan P; Kerrin M; O'Neill P
    Med Educ; 2012 Sep; 46(9):850-68. PubMed ID: 22891906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predicting success in medical school: a longitudinal study of common Australian student selection tools.
    Sladek RM; Bond MJ; Frost LK; Prior KN
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Jul; 16():187. PubMed ID: 27450570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Widening access in selection using situational judgement tests: evidence from the UKCAT.
    Lievens F; Patterson F; Corstjens J; Martin S; Nicholson S
    Med Educ; 2016 Jun; 50(6):624-36. PubMed ID: 27170081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Selection of medical students : Measurement of cognitive abilities and psychosocial competencies].
    Schwibbe A; Lackamp J; Knorr M; Hissbach J; Kadmon M; Hampe W
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2018 Feb; 61(2):178-186. PubMed ID: 29294180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can the UK Clinical Aptitude Test (UKCAT) select suitable candidates for interview?
    Turner R; Nicholson S
    Med Educ; 2011 Oct; 45(10):1041-7. PubMed ID: 21916942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of response instructions and response format on applicant perceptions of a situational judgement test for medical school selection.
    De Leng WE; Stegers-Jager KM; Born MP; Themmen APN
    BMC Med Educ; 2018 Nov; 18(1):282. PubMed ID: 30477494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comprehensive model for the selection of medical students.
    Bore M; Munro D; Powis D
    Med Teach; 2009 Dec; 31(12):1066-72. PubMed ID: 19995169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Personal domains assessed in multiple mini interviews (MMIs) for healthcare student selection: A narrative synthesis systematic review.
    Callwood A; Jeevaratnam K; Kotronoulas G; Schneider A; Lewis L; Nadarajah VD
    Nurse Educ Today; 2018 May; 64():56-64. PubMed ID: 29459193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Core personal competencies important to entering students' success in medical school: what are they and how could they be assessed early in the admission process?
    Koenig TW; Parrish SK; Terregino CA; Williams JP; Dunleavy DM; Volsch JM
    Acad Med; 2013 May; 88(5):603-13. PubMed ID: 23524928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The value of situational judgement tests for assessing non-academic attributes in dental selection.
    Taylor N; Mehra S; Elley K; Patterson F; Cousans F
    Br Dent J; 2016 Jun; 220(11):565-6. PubMed ID: 27283558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.